aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMartin Sebor <msebor@redhat.com>2020-09-30 12:58:09 -0600
committerMartin Sebor <msebor@redhat.com>2020-09-30 12:59:53 -0600
commit7dbc7ad524a540e34ce25d120d0968f36c571bbb (patch)
tree245770a1d21bc0447338a70798ca0796c1bebf59
parente808f3fdfa8f31066da19011b55acb8c0446c72d (diff)
downloadgcc-7dbc7ad524a540e34ce25d120d0968f36c571bbb.zip
gcc-7dbc7ad524a540e34ce25d120d0968f36c571bbb.tar.gz
gcc-7dbc7ad524a540e34ce25d120d0968f36c571bbb.tar.bz2
Avoid assuming a VLA access specification string contains a closing bracket (PR middle-end/97189).
Resolves: PR middle-end/97189 - ICE on redeclaration of a function with VLA argument and attribute access gcc/ChangeLog: PR middle-end/97189 * attribs.c (attr_access::array_as_string): Avoid assuming a VLA access specification string contains a closing bracket. gcc/c-family/ChangeLog: PR middle-end/97189 * c-attribs.c (append_access_attr): Use the function declaration location for a warning about an attribute access argument. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR middle-end/97189 * gcc.dg/attr-access-2.c: Adjust caret location. * gcc.dg/Wvla-parameter-6.c: New test. * gcc.dg/Wvla-parameter-7.c: New test.
-rw-r--r--gcc/attribs.c4
-rw-r--r--gcc/c-family/c-attribs.c18
-rw-r--r--gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/Wvla-parameter-6.c34
-rw-r--r--gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/Wvla-parameter-7.c36
-rw-r--r--gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-access-2.c10
5 files changed, 86 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/attribs.c b/gcc/attribs.c
index 3f6ec3d..94b9e02 100644
--- a/gcc/attribs.c
+++ b/gcc/attribs.c
@@ -2270,11 +2270,11 @@ attr_access::array_as_string (tree type) const
bound is nonconstant and whose access string has "$]" in it)
extract the bound expression from SIZE. */
const char *p = end;
- for ( ; *p-- != ']'; );
+ for ( ; p != str && *p-- != ']'; );
if (*p == '$')
index_type = build_index_type (TREE_VALUE (size));
}
- else if (minsize)
+ else if (minsize)
index_type = build_index_type (size_int (minsize - 1));
tree arat = NULL_TREE;
diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-attribs.c b/gcc/c-family/c-attribs.c
index 70b0003..c779d13 100644
--- a/gcc/c-family/c-attribs.c
+++ b/gcc/c-family/c-attribs.c
@@ -4151,18 +4151,12 @@ append_access_attr (tree node[3], tree attrs, const char *attrstr,
"missing in previous designation",
attrstr);
else if (newa->internal_p || cura->internal_p)
- {
- /* Mismatch in the value of the size argument and a VLA
- bound. */
- location_t argloc = curloc;
- if (tree arg = get_argument (node[2], newa->sizarg))
- argloc = DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (arg);
- warned = warning_at (argloc, OPT_Wattributes,
- "attribute %qs positional argument 2 "
- "conflicts with previous designation "
- "by argument %u",
- attrstr, cura->sizarg + 1);
- }
+ /* Mismatch in the value of the size argument and a VLA bound. */
+ warned = warning_at (curloc, OPT_Wattributes,
+ "attribute %qs positional argument 2 "
+ "conflicts with previous designation "
+ "by argument %u",
+ attrstr, cura->sizarg + 1);
else
/* Mismatch in the value of the size argument between two
explicit access attributes. */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/Wvla-parameter-6.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/Wvla-parameter-6.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..268aeec
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/Wvla-parameter-6.c
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+/* PR middle-end/97189 - ICE on redeclaration of a function with VLA argument
+ and attribute access
+ Also verify the right arguments are underlined in the notes.
+ { dg-do compile }
+ { dg-options "-Wall -fdiagnostics-show-caret" } */
+
+#define RW(...) __attribute__ ((access (read_write, __VA_ARGS__)))
+
+RW (2, 3) void f1 (int n, int[n], int);
+/* { dg-warning "attribute 'access \\(read_write, 2, 3\\)' positional argument 2 conflicts with previous designation by argument 3" "warning" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
+ { dg-begin-multiline-output "" }
+ RW (2, 3) void f1 (int n, int[n], int);
+ ^~
+ { dg-end-multiline-output "" }
+ { dg-message "designating the bound of variable length array argument 2" "note" { target *-*-* } .-6 }
+ { dg-begin-multiline-output "" }
+ RW (2, 3) void f1 (int n, int[n], int);
+ ~~~~^ ~~~~~~
+ { dg-end-multiline-output "" } */
+
+
+RW (2) void f2 (int, int[*], int);
+/* { dg-message "previously declared as a variable length array 'int\\\[\\\*]'" "note" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
+ { dg-begin-multiline-output "" }
+ RW (2, 3) void f2 (int, int[], int);
+ ^~~~~
+ { dg-end-multiline-output "" } */
+
+RW (2, 3) void f2 (int, int[], int);
+/* { dg-warning "argument 2 of type 'int\\\[]' declared as an ordinary array" "warning" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
+ { dg-begin-multiline-output "" }
+ RW (2) void f2 (int, int[*], int);
+ ^~~~~~
+ { dg-end-multiline-output "" } */
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/Wvla-parameter-7.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/Wvla-parameter-7.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..14ce75f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/Wvla-parameter-7.c
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+/* PR middle-end/97189 - ICE on redeclaration of a function with VLA argument
+ and attribute access
+ { dg-do compile }
+ { dg-options "-Wall" } */
+
+#define RW(...) __attribute__ ((access (read_write, __VA_ARGS__)))
+
+RW (2, 3) void f1 (int n, int[n], int);
+/* { dg-warning "attribute 'access \\(read_write, 2, 3\\)' positional argument 2 conflicts with previous designation by argument 3" "warning" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
+ { dg-message "designating the bound of variable length array argument 2" "note" { target *-*-* } .-2 } */
+
+void call_f1 (int *p)
+{
+ /* Verify that a warning is issued. Ideally, it seems the VLA bound
+ should take precedence over the attribute and the warning would
+ reference argument 1 but since the conflict in the redeclarations
+ of the function is already diagnosed don't test that (and let it
+ be acceptable for this warning to reference argument 3). */
+ f1 (-1, p, -1);
+ // { dg-warning "argument \\d value -1 is negative" "warning" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
+}
+
+RW (2) void f2 (int, int[*], int);
+// { dg-message "previously declared as a variable length array 'int\\\[\\\*]'" "note" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
+RW (2, 3) void f2 (int, int[], int);
+// { dg-warning "argument 2 of type 'int\\\[]' declared as an ordinary array" "warning" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
+
+void call_f2 (int *p)
+{
+ f2 (-1, p, 0);
+
+ /* Verify that the attribute access on the redeclaration of f2() takes
+ precedence over the one on the first declaration. */
+ f2 (0, p, -1);
+ // { dg-warning "argument 3 value -1 is negative" "warning" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-access-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-access-2.c
index 7476261..76baddf 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-access-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/attr-access-2.c
@@ -112,5 +112,11 @@ typedef void G1 (int n, int[n], int);
G1 g1;
-RW (2, 3) void g1 (int n, int[n], int); // { dg-warning "24: attribute 'access *\\\(read_write, 2, 3\\\)' positional argument 2 conflicts with previous designation by argument 3" }
-// { dg-message "designating the bound of variable length array argument 2" "note" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
+/* The warning is about the attribute positional argument 2 which refers
+ to the last function argument. Ideally, the caret would be under
+ the corresponding function argument, i.e., the last one here) but
+ that location isn't available yet. Verify that the caret doesn't
+ point to function argument 1 which is the VLA bound (that's what
+ the caret in the note points to). */
+RW (2, 3) void g1 (int n, int[n], int); // { dg-warning "16: attribute 'access *\\\(read_write, 2, 3\\\)' positional argument 2 conflicts with previous designation by argument 3" }
+// { dg-message "24:designating the bound of variable length array argument 2" "note" { target *-*-* } .-1 }