diff options
author | Mikael Morin <mikael@gcc.gnu.org> | 2024-09-21 18:32:59 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Mikael Morin <mikael@gcc.gnu.org> | 2024-09-21 18:32:59 +0200 |
commit | 7d43b4e06786c1023210f90e5231bde947aef3af (patch) | |
tree | 88938c917f25d22695e99fe6fac5f816638b289a | |
parent | 5999d558e74b3531536c74976e8f05bb3ed31335 (diff) | |
download | gcc-7d43b4e06786c1023210f90e5231bde947aef3af.zip gcc-7d43b4e06786c1023210f90e5231bde947aef3af.tar.gz gcc-7d43b4e06786c1023210f90e5231bde947aef3af.tar.bz2 |
fortran: Inline non-character MINLOC/MAXLOC with no DIM [PR90608]
Enable generation of inline MINLOC/MAXLOC code in the case where DIM
is not present, and either ARRAY is of floating point type or MASK is an
array. Those cases are the remaining bits to fully support inlining of
non-CHARACTER MINLOC/MAXLOC without DIM. They are treated together because
they generate similar code, the NANs for REAL types being handled a bit like
a second level of masking. These are the cases for which we generate two
sets of loops.
This change affects the code generating the second loop, that was previously
accessible only in the cases ARRAY has rank 1 only. The single variable
initialization and update are changed to apply to multiple variables, one
per dimension.
The code generated is as follows (if ARRAY has rank 2):
for (idx11 in lower1..upper1)
{
for (idx12 in lower2..upper2)
{
...
if (...)
{
...
goto second_loop;
}
}
}
second_loop:
for (idx21 in lower1..upper1)
{
for (idx22 in lower2..upper2)
{
...
}
}
This code leads to processing the first elements redundantly, both in the
first set of loops and in the second one. The loop over idx22 could
start from idx12 the first time it is run, but as it has to start from
lower2 for the rest of the runs, this change uses the same bounds for both
set of loops for simplicity. In the rank 1 case, this makes the generated
code worse compared to the inline code that was generated before. A later
change will introduce conditionals to avoid the duplicate processing and
restore the generated code in that case.
PR fortran/90608
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
* trans-intrinsic.cc (gfc_conv_intrinsic_minmaxloc): Initialize
and update all the variables. Put the label and goto in the
outermost scalarizer loop. Don't start the second loop where the
first stopped.
(gfc_inline_intrinsic_function_p): Also return TRUE for array MASK
or for any REAL type.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gfortran.dg/maxloc_bounds_5.f90: Additionally accept error
messages reported by the scalarizer.
* gfortran.dg/maxloc_bounds_6.f90: Ditto.
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.cc | 127 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/maxloc_bounds_5.f90 | 4 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/maxloc_bounds_6.f90 | 4 |
3 files changed, 87 insertions, 48 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.cc b/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.cc index ed123f9..d8e456a 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.cc +++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-intrinsic.cc @@ -5368,12 +5368,55 @@ strip_kind_from_actual (gfc_actual_arglist * actual) } S++; } - B: ARRAY has rank 1, and DIM is absent. Use the same code as the scalar - case and wrap the result in an array. - C: ARRAY has rank > 1, NANs are not supported, and DIM and MASK are absent. - Generate code similar to the single loop scalar case, but using one - variable per dimension, for example if ARRAY has rank 2: - 4) NAN's aren't supported, no MASK: + B: Array result, non-CHARACTER type, DIM absent + Generate similar code as in the scalar case, using a collection of + variables (one per dimension) instead of a single variable as result. + Picking only cases 1) and 4) with ARRAY of rank 2, the generated code + becomes: + 1) Array mask is used and NaNs need to be supported: + limit = Infinity; + pos0 = 0; + pos1 = 0; + S1 = from1; + while (S1 <= to1) { + S0 = from0; + while (s0 <= to0 { + if (mask[S1][S0]) { + if (pos0 == 0) { + pos0 = S0 + (1 - from0); + pos1 = S1 + (1 - from1); + } + if (a[S1][S0] <= limit) { + limit = a[S1][S0]; + pos0 = S0 + (1 - from0); + pos1 = S1 + (1 - from1); + goto lab1; + } + } + S0++; + } + S1++; + } + goto lab2; + lab1:; + S1 = from1; + while (S1 <= to1) { + S0 = from0; + while (S0 <= to0) { + if (mask[S1][S0]) + if (a[S1][S0] < limit) { + limit = a[S1][S0]; + pos0 = S + (1 - from0); + pos1 = S + (1 - from1); + } + S0++; + } + S1++; + } + lab2:; + result = { pos0, pos1 }; + ... + 4) NANs aren't supported, no array mask. limit = infinities_supported ? Infinity : huge (limit); pos0 = (from0 <= to0 && from1 <= to1) ? 1 : 0; pos1 = (from0 <= to0 && from1 <= to1) ? 1 : 0; @@ -5391,7 +5434,7 @@ strip_kind_from_actual (gfc_actual_arglist * actual) S1++; } result = { pos0, pos1 }; - D: Otherwise, a call is generated. + C: Otherwise, a call is generated. For 2) and 4), if mask is scalar, this all goes into a conditional, setting pos = 0; in the else branch. @@ -5622,18 +5665,11 @@ gfc_conv_intrinsic_minmaxloc (gfc_se * se, gfc_expr * expr, enum tree_code op) /* The code generated can have more than one loop in sequence (see the comment at the function header). This doesn't work well with the scalarizer, which changes arrays' offset when the scalarization loops - are generated (see gfc_trans_preloop_setup). Fortunately, {min,max}loc - are currently inlined in the scalar case only (for which loop is of rank - one). As there is no dependency to care about in that case, there is no - temporary, so that we can use the scalarizer temporary code to handle - multiple loops. Thus, we set temp_dim here, we call gfc_mark_ss_chain_used - with flag=3 later, and we use gfc_trans_scalarized_loop_boundary even later - to restore offset. - TODO: this prevents inlining of rank > 0 minmaxloc calls, so this - should eventually go away. We could either create two loops properly, - or find another way to save/restore the array offsets between the two - loops (without conflicting with temporary management), or use a single - loop minmaxloc implementation. See PR 31067. */ + are generated (see gfc_trans_preloop_setup). Fortunately, we can use + the scalarizer temporary code to handle multiple loops. Thus, we set + temp_dim here, we call gfc_mark_ss_chain_used with flag=3 later, and + we use gfc_trans_scalarized_loop_boundary even later to restore + offset. */ loop.temp_dim = loop.dimen; gfc_conv_loop_setup (&loop, &expr->where); @@ -5676,8 +5712,8 @@ gfc_conv_intrinsic_minmaxloc (gfc_se * se, gfc_expr * expr, enum tree_code op) } else { - gcc_assert (loop.dimen == 1); - gfc_add_modify (&loop.pre, pos[0], gfc_index_zero_node); + for (int i = 0; i < loop.dimen; i++) + gfc_add_modify (&loop.pre, pos[i], gfc_index_zero_node); lab1 = gfc_build_label_decl (NULL_TREE); TREE_USED (lab1) = 1; lab2 = gfc_build_label_decl (NULL_TREE); @@ -5734,10 +5770,14 @@ gfc_conv_intrinsic_minmaxloc (gfc_se * se, gfc_expr * expr, enum tree_code op) tree ifbody2; gfc_start_block (&ifblock2); - tmp = fold_build2_loc (input_location, PLUS_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (pos[0]), - loop.loopvar[0], offset[0]); - gfc_add_modify (&ifblock2, pos[0], tmp); + for (int i = 0; i < loop.dimen; i++) + { + tmp = fold_build2_loc (input_location, PLUS_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (pos[i]), + loop.loopvar[i], offset[i]); + gfc_add_modify (&ifblock2, pos[i], tmp); + } ifbody2 = gfc_finish_block (&ifblock2); + cond = fold_build2_loc (input_location, EQ_EXPR, logical_type_node, pos[0], gfc_index_zero_node); tmp = build3_v (COND_EXPR, cond, ifbody2, @@ -5814,23 +5854,29 @@ gfc_conv_intrinsic_minmaxloc (gfc_se * se, gfc_expr * expr, enum tree_code op) if (lab1) { - gcc_assert (loop.dimen == 1); - gfc_trans_scalarized_loop_boundary (&loop, &body); + stmtblock_t * const outer_block = &loop.code[loop.dimen - 1]; + if (HONOR_NANS (DECL_MODE (limit))) { if (nonempty != NULL) { - ifbody = build2_v (MODIFY_EXPR, pos[0], gfc_index_one_node); + stmtblock_t init_block; + gfc_init_block (&init_block); + + for (int i = 0; i < loop.dimen; i++) + gfc_add_modify (&init_block, pos[i], gfc_index_one_node); + + tree ifbody = gfc_finish_block (&init_block); tmp = build3_v (COND_EXPR, nonempty, ifbody, build_empty_stmt (input_location)); - gfc_add_expr_to_block (&loop.code[0], tmp); + gfc_add_expr_to_block (outer_block, tmp); } } - gfc_add_expr_to_block (&loop.code[0], build1_v (GOTO_EXPR, lab2)); - gfc_add_expr_to_block (&loop.code[0], build1_v (LABEL_EXPR, lab1)); + gfc_add_expr_to_block (outer_block, build1_v (GOTO_EXPR, lab2)); + gfc_add_expr_to_block (outer_block, build1_v (LABEL_EXPR, lab1)); /* If we have a mask, only check this element if the mask is set. */ if (maskss) @@ -5859,9 +5905,12 @@ gfc_conv_intrinsic_minmaxloc (gfc_se * se, gfc_expr * expr, enum tree_code op) /* Assign the value to the limit... */ gfc_add_modify (&ifblock, limit, arrayse.expr); - tmp = fold_build2_loc (input_location, PLUS_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (pos[0]), - loop.loopvar[0], offset[0]); - gfc_add_modify (&ifblock, pos[0], tmp); + for (int i = 0; i < loop.dimen; i++) + { + tmp = fold_build2_loc (input_location, PLUS_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (pos[i]), + loop.loopvar[i], offset[i]); + gfc_add_modify (&ifblock, pos[i], tmp); + } ifbody = gfc_finish_block (&ifblock); @@ -5911,9 +5960,6 @@ gfc_conv_intrinsic_minmaxloc (gfc_se * se, gfc_expr * expr, enum tree_code op) else tmp = gfc_finish_block (&block); gfc_add_expr_to_block (&body, tmp); - /* Avoid initializing loopvar[0] again, it should be left where - it finished by the first loop. */ - loop.from[0] = loop.loopvar[0]; } gfc_trans_scalarizing_loops (&loop, &body); @@ -11838,11 +11884,9 @@ gfc_inline_intrinsic_function_p (gfc_expr *expr) gfc_actual_arglist *array_arg = expr->value.function.actual; gfc_actual_arglist *dim_arg = array_arg->next; - gfc_actual_arglist *mask_arg = dim_arg->next; gfc_expr *array = array_arg->expr; gfc_expr *dim = dim_arg->expr; - gfc_expr *mask = mask_arg->expr; if (!(array->ts.type == BT_INTEGER || array->ts.type == BT_REAL)) @@ -11851,12 +11895,7 @@ gfc_inline_intrinsic_function_p (gfc_expr *expr) if (array->rank == 1) return true; - if (array->ts.type != BT_INTEGER - || dim != nullptr) - return false; - - if (mask == nullptr - || mask->rank == 0) + if (dim == nullptr) return true; return false; diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/maxloc_bounds_5.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/maxloc_bounds_5.f90 index ad93d23..071c1c3 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/maxloc_bounds_5.f90 +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/maxloc_bounds_5.f90 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ ! { dg-do run } ! { dg-options "-fbounds-check" } -! { dg-shouldfail "Incorrect extent in return value of MAXLOC intrinsic: is 3, should be 2" } +! { dg-shouldfail "Incorrect extent in return value of MAXLOC intrinsic: is 3, should be 2|Array bound mismatch for dimension 1 of array 'res' .3/2." } module tst contains subroutine foo(res) @@ -18,4 +18,4 @@ program main integer :: res(3) call foo(res) end program main -! { dg-output "Fortran runtime error: Incorrect extent in return value of MAXLOC intrinsic: is 3, should be 2" } +! { dg-output "Fortran runtime error: Incorrect extent in return value of MAXLOC intrinsic: is 3, should be 2|Array bound mismatch for dimension 1 of array 'res' .3/2." } diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/maxloc_bounds_6.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/maxloc_bounds_6.f90 index 3a63418..0ce0bfc 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/maxloc_bounds_6.f90 +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/maxloc_bounds_6.f90 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ ! { dg-do run } ! { dg-options "-fbounds-check" } -! { dg-shouldfail "Incorrect extent in MASK argument of MAXLOC intrinsic in dimension 2: is 3, should be 2" } +! { dg-shouldfail "Incorrect extent in MASK argument of MAXLOC intrinsic in dimension 2: is 3, should be 2|Array bound mismatch for dimension 2 of array 'm' .3/2." } program main integer(kind=4), allocatable :: f(:,:) logical, allocatable :: m(:,:) @@ -12,4 +12,4 @@ program main res = maxloc(f,mask=m) write(line,fmt='(80I1)') res end program main -! { dg-output "Fortran runtime error: Incorrect extent in MASK argument of MAXLOC intrinsic in dimension 2: is 3, should be 2" } +! { dg-output "Fortran runtime error: Incorrect extent in MASK argument of MAXLOC intrinsic in dimension 2: is 3, should be 2|Array bound mismatch for dimension 2 of array 'm' .3/2." } |