diff options
| author | Andrew Pinski <quic_apinski@quicinc.com> | 2024-09-07 11:43:03 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Andrew Pinski <quic_apinski@quicinc.com> | 2024-09-07 12:08:59 -0700 |
| commit | 69d82c1dccb3583464228eb5449e29918eeb4ee4 (patch) | |
| tree | 3a90f4c99edd61f6f6795e525f85999e3197d0ff | |
| parent | dfb63765e994bee74d533c810fdf75d3269530ad (diff) | |
| download | gcc-69d82c1dccb3583464228eb5449e29918eeb4ee4.zip gcc-69d82c1dccb3583464228eb5449e29918eeb4ee4.tar.gz gcc-69d82c1dccb3583464228eb5449e29918eeb4ee4.tar.bz2 | |
split-path: Fix dump wording about duplicating too many statements
It was pointed out in https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-September/662183.html,
that the wording with this print has too many words.
Fixed thusly.
Pushed as obvious after a build and test for x86_64-linux-gnu.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* gimple-ssa-split-paths.cc (is_feasible_trace): Fix wording
on the print.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Pinski <quic_apinski@quicinc.com>
| -rw-r--r-- | gcc/gimple-ssa-split-paths.cc | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/gimple-ssa-split-paths.cc b/gcc/gimple-ssa-split-paths.cc index 32b5c44..886d85a 100644 --- a/gcc/gimple-ssa-split-paths.cc +++ b/gcc/gimple-ssa-split-paths.cc @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ is_feasible_trace (basic_block bb) { if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS)) fprintf (dump_file, - "Duplicating block %d would be too duplicate " + "Duplicating block %d would duplicate " "too many statments: %d >= %d\n", bb->index, num_stmts_in_join, param_max_jump_thread_duplication_stmts); |