aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>2022-09-04 21:21:32 +0200
committerAldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>2022-09-05 08:21:41 +0200
commit5f3228935e27780430a8a1504c2fa4a1ff978594 (patch)
treeb9c2c7417150a1c9e4fe2e046298357815c09a3e
parent5e070cf4bd085e10601195bb223dd1a0edeecf4d (diff)
downloadgcc-5f3228935e27780430a8a1504c2fa4a1ff978594.zip
gcc-5f3228935e27780430a8a1504c2fa4a1ff978594.tar.gz
gcc-5f3228935e27780430a8a1504c2fa4a1ff978594.tar.bz2
Be even more conservative in intersection of NANs.
Intersecting two ranges where one is a NAN is keeping the sign bit of the NAN range. This is not correct as the sign bits may not match. I think the only time we're absolutely sure about the intersection of a NAN and something else, is when both are a NAN with exactly the same properties (sign bit). If we're intersecting two NANs of differing sign, we can decide later whether that's undefined or just a NAN with no known sign. For now I've done the latter. I'm still mentally working on intersections involving NANs, especially if we want to keep track of signbits. For now, let's be extra careful and only do things we're absolutely sure about. Later we may want to fold the intersect of [NAN,NAN] and say [3,5] with the posibility of NAN, to a NAN, but I'm not 100% sure. As I've said before, setting varying is always a safe choice, because it means we know nothing and ranger won't attempt to optimize anything. gcc/ChangeLog: * value-range.cc (early_nan_resolve): Remove. (frange::intersect): Handle NANs.
-rw-r--r--gcc/value-range.cc35
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 19 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/value-range.cc b/gcc/value-range.cc
index c9f42fe..9c56141 100644
--- a/gcc/value-range.cc
+++ b/gcc/value-range.cc
@@ -444,24 +444,6 @@ frange::normalize_kind ()
return false;
}
-// If both operands are definitely NAN, do nothing as they combine
-// perfectly. If OTOH, only one is a NAN, set R to VARYING as they
-// can't be neither unioned nor intersected. Return TRUE if we
-// changed anything.
-
-static inline bool
-early_nan_resolve (frange &r, const frange &other)
-{
- gcc_checking_assert (r.get_nan ().yes_p () || other.get_nan ().yes_p ());
-
- // There's nothing to do for both NANs.
- if (r.get_nan ().yes_p () == other.get_nan ().yes_p ())
- return false;
- // ?? Perhaps the intersection of a NAN and anything is a NAN ??.
- r.set_varying (r.type ());
- return true;
-}
-
bool
frange::union_ (const vrange &v)
{
@@ -532,8 +514,23 @@ frange::intersect (const vrange &v)
*this = r;
return true;
}
+
+ // If two NANs are not exactly the same, drop to an unknown NAN,
+ // otherwise there's nothing to do.
+ if (get_nan ().yes_p () && r.get_nan ().yes_p ())
+ {
+ if (m_props == r.m_props)
+ return false;
+
+ *this = frange_nan (m_type);
+ return true;
+ }
+ // ?? Perhaps the intersection of a NAN and anything is a NAN ??.
if (get_nan ().yes_p () || r.get_nan ().yes_p ())
- return early_nan_resolve (*this, r);
+ {
+ set_varying (m_type);
+ return true;
+ }
bool changed = m_props.intersect (r.m_props);