aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorFrancois-Xavier Coudert <fxcoudert@gcc.gnu.org>2007-03-23 07:00:56 +0000
committerFrançois-Xavier Coudert <fxcoudert@gcc.gnu.org>2007-03-23 07:00:56 +0000
commit3c2e80433d69dc6df77a1e916fe35d75a470528f (patch)
tree2b25f4f47d8b5f4892e7ada924f649bce679673a
parent03c17ccd922a49ed07c89b5c533e86318d225c78 (diff)
downloadgcc-3c2e80433d69dc6df77a1e916fe35d75a470528f.zip
gcc-3c2e80433d69dc6df77a1e916fe35d75a470528f.tar.gz
gcc-3c2e80433d69dc6df77a1e916fe35d75a470528f.tar.bz2
re PR fortran/30834 (ICE with kind=8 exponentiaton)
PR fortran/30834 * arith.c (complex_pow): Rewrite to handle large power. (gfc_arith_power): Handle large power in the real and integer cases. * gfortran.dg/integer_exponentiation_3.F90: New test. * gfortran.dg/integer_exponentiation_4.f90: New test. * gfortran.dg/integer_exponentiation_5.F90: New test. From-SVN: r123154
-rw-r--r--gcc/fortran/ChangeLog7
-rw-r--r--gcc/fortran/arith.c178
-rw-r--r--gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog7
-rw-r--r--gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/integer_exponentiation_3.F90201
-rw-r--r--gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/integer_exponentiation_4.f9044
-rw-r--r--gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/integer_exponentiation_5.F9078
6 files changed, 459 insertions, 56 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog b/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
index 0cee9c8..674b997 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+2007-03-23 Francois-Xavier Coudert <fxcoudert@gcc.gnu.org>
+
+ PR fortran/30834
+ * arith.c (complex_pow): Rewrite to handle large power.
+ (gfc_arith_power): Handle large power in the real and integer
+ cases.
+
2007-03-22 Francois-Xavier Coudert <coudert@clipper.ens.fr>
PR fortran/31262
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/arith.c b/gcc/fortran/arith.c
index 39bc4b9..e6c2d0f 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/arith.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/arith.c
@@ -872,42 +872,69 @@ complex_reciprocal (gfc_expr *op)
}
-/* Raise a complex number to positive power. */
+/* Raise a complex number to positive power (power > 0).
+ This function will modify the content of power.
+
+ Use Binary Method, which is not an optimal but a simple and reasonable
+ arithmetic. See section 4.6.3, "Evaluation of Powers" of Donald E. Knuth,
+ "Seminumerical Algorithms", Vol. 2, "The Art of Computer Programming",
+ 3rd Edition, 1998. */
static void
-complex_pow_ui (gfc_expr *base, int power, gfc_expr *result)
+complex_pow (gfc_expr *result, gfc_expr *base, mpz_t power)
{
- mpfr_t re, im, a;
+ mpfr_t x_r, x_i, tmp, re, im;
gfc_set_model (base->value.complex.r);
+ mpfr_init (x_r);
+ mpfr_init (x_i);
+ mpfr_init (tmp);
mpfr_init (re);
mpfr_init (im);
- mpfr_init (a);
+ /* res = 1 */
mpfr_set_ui (result->value.complex.r, 1, GFC_RND_MODE);
mpfr_set_ui (result->value.complex.i, 0, GFC_RND_MODE);
- for (; power > 0; power--)
+ /* x = base */
+ mpfr_set (x_r, base->value.complex.r, GFC_RND_MODE);
+ mpfr_set (x_i, base->value.complex.i, GFC_RND_MODE);
+
+/* Macro for complex multiplication. We have to take care that
+ res_r/res_i and a_r/a_i can (and will) be the same variable. */
+#define CMULT(res_r,res_i,a_r,a_i,b_r,b_i) \
+ mpfr_mul (re, a_r, b_r, GFC_RND_MODE), \
+ mpfr_mul (tmp, a_i, b_i, GFC_RND_MODE), \
+ mpfr_sub (re, re, tmp, GFC_RND_MODE), \
+ \
+ mpfr_mul (im, a_r, b_i, GFC_RND_MODE), \
+ mpfr_mul (tmp, a_i, b_r, GFC_RND_MODE), \
+ mpfr_add (res_i, im, tmp, GFC_RND_MODE), \
+ mpfr_set (res_r, re, GFC_RND_MODE)
+
+#define res_r result->value.complex.r
+#define res_i result->value.complex.i
+
+ /* for (; power > 0; x *= x) */
+ for (; mpz_cmp_si (power, 0) > 0; CMULT(x_r,x_i,x_r,x_i,x_r,x_i))
{
- mpfr_mul (re, base->value.complex.r, result->value.complex.r,
- GFC_RND_MODE);
- mpfr_mul (a, base->value.complex.i, result->value.complex.i,
- GFC_RND_MODE);
- mpfr_sub (re, re, a, GFC_RND_MODE);
-
- mpfr_mul (im, base->value.complex.r, result->value.complex.i,
- GFC_RND_MODE);
- mpfr_mul (a, base->value.complex.i, result->value.complex.r,
- GFC_RND_MODE);
- mpfr_add (im, im, a, GFC_RND_MODE);
+ /* if (power & 1) res = res * x; */
+ if (mpz_congruent_ui_p (power, 1, 2))
+ CMULT(res_r,res_i,res_r,res_i,x_r,x_i);
- mpfr_set (result->value.complex.r, re, GFC_RND_MODE);
- mpfr_set (result->value.complex.i, im, GFC_RND_MODE);
+ /* power /= 2; */
+ mpz_fdiv_q_ui (power, power, 2);
}
+#undef res_r
+#undef res_i
+#undef CMULT
+
+ mpfr_clear (x_r);
+ mpfr_clear (x_i);
+ mpfr_clear (tmp);
mpfr_clear (re);
mpfr_clear (im);
- mpfr_clear (a);
}
@@ -916,20 +943,17 @@ complex_pow_ui (gfc_expr *base, int power, gfc_expr *result)
static arith
gfc_arith_power (gfc_expr *op1, gfc_expr *op2, gfc_expr **resultp)
{
- int power, apower;
+ int power_sign;
gfc_expr *result;
- mpz_t unity_z;
- mpfr_t unity_f;
arith rc;
- rc = ARITH_OK;
-
- if (gfc_extract_int (op2, &power) != NULL)
- gfc_internal_error ("gfc_arith_power(): Bad exponent");
+ gcc_assert (op2->expr_type == EXPR_CONSTANT && op2->ts.type == BT_INTEGER);
+ rc = ARITH_OK;
result = gfc_constant_result (op1->ts.type, op1->ts.kind, &op1->where);
+ power_sign = mpz_sgn (op2->value.integer);
- if (power == 0)
+ if (power_sign == 0)
{
/* Handle something to the zeroth power. Since we're dealing
with integral exponents, there is no ambiguity in the
@@ -955,44 +979,86 @@ gfc_arith_power (gfc_expr *op1, gfc_expr *op2, gfc_expr **resultp)
}
else
{
- apower = power;
- if (power < 0)
- apower = -power;
-
switch (op1->ts.type)
{
case BT_INTEGER:
- mpz_pow_ui (result->value.integer, op1->value.integer, apower);
-
- if (power < 0)
- {
- mpz_init_set_ui (unity_z, 1);
- mpz_tdiv_q (result->value.integer, unity_z,
- result->value.integer);
- mpz_clear (unity_z);
- }
+ {
+ int power;
+
+ /* First, we simplify the cases of op1 == 1, 0 or -1. */
+ if (mpz_cmp_si (op1->value.integer, 1) == 0)
+ {
+ /* 1**op2 == 1 */
+ mpz_set_si (result->value.integer, 1);
+ }
+ else if (mpz_cmp_si (op1->value.integer, 0) == 0)
+ {
+ /* 0**op2 == 0, if op2 > 0
+ 0**op2 overflow, if op2 < 0 ; in that case, we
+ set the result to 0 and return ARITH_DIV0. */
+ mpz_set_si (result->value.integer, 0);
+ if (mpz_cmp_si (op2->value.integer, 0) < 0)
+ rc = ARITH_DIV0;
+ }
+ else if (mpz_cmp_si (op1->value.integer, -1) == 0)
+ {
+ /* (-1)**op2 == (-1)**(mod(op2,2)) */
+ unsigned int odd = mpz_fdiv_ui (op2->value.integer, 2);
+ if (odd)
+ mpz_set_si (result->value.integer, -1);
+ else
+ mpz_set_si (result->value.integer, 1);
+ }
+ /* Then, we take care of op2 < 0. */
+ else if (mpz_cmp_si (op2->value.integer, 0) < 0)
+ {
+ /* if op2 < 0, op1**op2 == 0 because abs(op1) > 1. */
+ mpz_set_si (result->value.integer, 0);
+ }
+ else if (gfc_extract_int (op2, &power) != NULL)
+ {
+ /* If op2 doesn't fit in an int, the exponentiation will
+ overflow, because op2 > 0 and abs(op1) > 1. */
+ mpz_t max;
+ int i = gfc_validate_kind (BT_INTEGER, result->ts.kind, false);
+
+ if (gfc_option.flag_range_check)
+ rc = ARITH_OVERFLOW;
+
+ /* Still, we want to give the same value as the processor. */
+ mpz_init (max);
+ mpz_add_ui (max, gfc_integer_kinds[i].huge, 1);
+ mpz_mul_ui (max, max, 2);
+ mpz_powm (result->value.integer, op1->value.integer,
+ op2->value.integer, max);
+ mpz_clear (max);
+ }
+ else
+ mpz_pow_ui (result->value.integer, op1->value.integer, power);
+ }
break;
case BT_REAL:
- mpfr_pow_ui (result->value.real, op1->value.real, apower,
- GFC_RND_MODE);
-
- if (power < 0)
- {
- gfc_set_model (op1->value.real);
- mpfr_init (unity_f);
- mpfr_set_ui (unity_f, 1, GFC_RND_MODE);
- mpfr_div (result->value.real, unity_f, result->value.real,
- GFC_RND_MODE);
- mpfr_clear (unity_f);
- }
+ mpfr_pow_z (result->value.real, op1->value.real, op2->value.integer,
+ GFC_RND_MODE);
break;
case BT_COMPLEX:
- complex_pow_ui (op1, apower, result);
- if (power < 0)
- complex_reciprocal (result);
- break;
+ {
+ mpz_t apower;
+
+ /* Compute op1**abs(op2) */
+ mpz_init (apower);
+ mpz_abs (apower, op2->value.integer);
+ complex_pow (result, op1, apower);
+ mpz_clear (apower);
+
+ /* If (op2 < 0), compute the inverse. */
+ if (power_sign < 0)
+ complex_reciprocal (result);
+
+ break;
+ }
default:
break;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
index 1cbb1af..aa313d9 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+2007-03-23 Francois-Xavier Coudert <fxcoudert@gcc.gnu.org>
+
+ PR fortran/30834
+ * gfortran.dg/integer_exponentiation_3.F90: New test.
+ * gfortran.dg/integer_exponentiation_4.f90: New test.
+ * gfortran.dg/integer_exponentiation_5.F90: New test.
+
2007-03-22 Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
PR c++/30863
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/integer_exponentiation_3.F90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/integer_exponentiation_3.F90
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6f0640b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/integer_exponentiation_3.F90
@@ -0,0 +1,201 @@
+! { dg-do run }
+! { dg-options "" }
+module mod_check
+ implicit none
+
+ interface check
+ module procedure check_i8
+ module procedure check_i4
+ module procedure check_r8
+ module procedure check_r4
+ module procedure check_c8
+ module procedure check_c4
+ end interface check
+
+ interface acheck
+ module procedure acheck_c8
+ module procedure acheck_c4
+ end interface acheck
+
+contains
+
+ subroutine check_i8 (a, b)
+ integer(kind=8), intent(in) :: a, b
+ if (a /= b) call abort()
+ end subroutine check_i8
+
+ subroutine check_i4 (a, b)
+ integer(kind=4), intent(in) :: a, b
+ if (a /= b) call abort()
+ end subroutine check_i4
+
+ subroutine check_r8 (a, b)
+ real(kind=8), intent(in) :: a, b
+ if (a /= b) call abort()
+ end subroutine check_r8
+
+ subroutine check_r4 (a, b)
+ real(kind=4), intent(in) :: a, b
+ if (a /= b) call abort()
+ end subroutine check_r4
+
+ subroutine check_c8 (a, b)
+ complex(kind=8), intent(in) :: a, b
+ if (a /= b) call abort()
+ end subroutine check_c8
+
+ subroutine check_c4 (a, b)
+ complex(kind=4), intent(in) :: a, b
+ if (a /= b) call abort()
+ end subroutine check_c4
+
+ subroutine acheck_c8 (a, b)
+ complex(kind=8), intent(in) :: a, b
+ if (abs(a-b) > 1.d-9 * min(abs(a),abs(b))) call abort()
+ end subroutine acheck_c8
+
+ subroutine acheck_c4 (a, b)
+ complex(kind=4), intent(in) :: a, b
+ if (abs(a-b) > 1.e-5 * min(abs(a),abs(b))) call abort()
+ end subroutine acheck_c4
+
+end module mod_check
+
+program test
+ use mod_check
+ implicit none
+
+ integer(kind=4) :: i4
+ integer(kind=8) :: i8
+ real(kind=4) :: r4
+ real(kind=8) :: r8
+ complex(kind=4) :: c4
+ complex(kind=8) :: c8
+
+#define TEST(base,exp,var) var = base; call check((var)**(exp),(base)**(exp))
+#define ATEST(base,exp,var) var = base; call acheck((var)**(exp),(base)**(exp))
+
+!!!!! INTEGER BASE !!!!!
+ TEST(0,0,i4)
+ TEST(0_8,0_8,i8)
+ TEST(1,0,i4)
+ TEST(1_8,0_8,i8)
+ TEST(-1,0,i4)
+ TEST(-1_8,0_8,i8)
+ TEST(huge(0),0,i4)
+ TEST(huge(0_8),0_8,i8)
+ TEST(-huge(0)-1,0,i4)
+ TEST(-huge(0_8)-1_8,0_8,i8)
+
+ TEST(1,1,i4)
+ TEST(1_8,1_8,i8)
+ TEST(1,2,i4)
+ TEST(1_8,2_8,i8)
+ TEST(1,-1,i4)
+ TEST(1_8,-1_8,i8)
+ TEST(1,-2,i4)
+ TEST(1_8,-2_8,i8)
+ TEST(1,huge(0),i4)
+ TEST(1_8,huge(0_8),i8)
+ TEST(1,-huge(0)-1,i4)
+ TEST(1_8,-huge(0_8)-1_8,i8)
+
+ TEST(-1,1,i4)
+ TEST(-1_8,1_8,i8)
+ TEST(-1,2,i4)
+ TEST(-1_8,2_8,i8)
+ TEST(-1,-1,i4)
+ TEST(-1_8,-1_8,i8)
+ TEST(-1,-2,i4)
+ TEST(-1_8,-2_8,i8)
+ TEST(-1,huge(0),i4)
+ TEST(-1_8,huge(0_8),i8)
+ TEST(-1,-huge(0)-1,i4)
+ TEST(-1_8,-huge(0_8)-1_8,i8)
+
+ TEST(2,9,i4)
+ TEST(2_8,9_8,i8)
+ TEST(-2,9,i4)
+ TEST(-2_8,9_8,i8)
+ TEST(2,-9,i4)
+ TEST(2_8,-9_8,i8)
+ TEST(-2,-9,i4)
+ TEST(-2_8,-9_8,i8)
+
+!!!!! REAL BASE !!!!!
+ TEST(0.0,0,r4)
+ TEST(0.0,1,r4)
+ TEST(0.0,huge(0),r4)
+ TEST(0.0,0_8,r4)
+ TEST(0.0,1_8,r4)
+ TEST(0.0,huge(0_8),r4)
+
+ TEST(1.0,0,r4)
+ TEST(1.0,1,r4)
+ TEST(1.0,-1,r4)
+ TEST(1.0,huge(0),r4)
+ TEST(1.0,-huge(0)-1,r4)
+ TEST(1.0,0_8,r4)
+ TEST(1.0,1_8,r4)
+ TEST(1.0,-1_8,r4)
+ TEST(1.0,huge(0_8),r4)
+ TEST(1.0,-huge(0_8)-1_8,r4)
+
+ TEST(-1.0,0,r4)
+ TEST(-1.0,1,r4)
+ TEST(-1.0,-1,r4)
+ TEST(-1.0,huge(0),r4)
+ TEST(-1.0,-huge(0)-1,r4)
+ TEST(-1.0,0_8,r4)
+ TEST(-1.0,1_8,r4)
+ TEST(-1.0,-1_8,r4)
+ TEST(-1.0,huge(0_8),r4)
+ TEST(-1.0,-huge(0_8)-1_8,r4)
+
+ TEST(2.0,0,r4)
+ TEST(2.0,1,r4)
+ TEST(2.0,-1,r4)
+ TEST(2.0,3,r4)
+ TEST(2.0,-3,r4)
+ TEST(2.0,0_8,r4)
+ TEST(2.0,1_8,r4)
+ TEST(2.0,-1_8,r4)
+ TEST(2.0,3_8,r4)
+ TEST(2.0,-3_8,r4)
+
+ TEST(nearest(1.0,-1.0),0,r4)
+ TEST(nearest(1.0,-1.0),huge(0),r4) ! { dg-warning "Arithmetic underflow" }
+ TEST(nearest(1.0,-1.0),0_8,r4)
+ TEST(nearest(1.0_8,-1.0),huge(0_8),r8) ! { dg-warning "Arithmetic underflow" }
+
+ TEST(nearest(1.0,-1.0),107,r4)
+ TEST(nearest(1.0,1.0),107,r4)
+
+!!!!! COMPLEX BASE !!!!!
+ TEST((1.0,0.2),0,c4)
+ TEST((1.0,0.2),1,c4)
+ TEST((1.0,0.2),2,c4)
+ TEST((1.0,0.2),9,c4)
+ ATEST((1.0,0.2),-1,c4)
+ ATEST((1.0,0.2),-2,c4)
+ ATEST((1.0,0.2),-9,c4)
+
+ TEST((0.0,0.2),0,c4)
+ TEST((0.0,0.2),1,c4)
+ TEST((0.0,0.2),2,c4)
+ TEST((0.0,0.2),9,c4)
+ ATEST((0.0,0.2),-1,c4)
+ ATEST((0.0,0.2),-2,c4)
+ ATEST((0.0,0.2),-9,c4)
+
+ TEST((1.0,0.),0,c4)
+ TEST((1.0,0.),1,c4)
+ TEST((1.0,0.),2,c4)
+ TEST((1.0,0.),9,c4)
+ ATEST((1.0,0.),-1,c4)
+ ATEST((1.0,0.),-2,c4)
+ ATEST((1.0,0.),-9,c4)
+
+end program test
+
+! { dg-final { cleanup-modules "mod_check" } }
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/integer_exponentiation_4.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/integer_exponentiation_4.f90
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..55d1dcd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/integer_exponentiation_4.f90
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+! { dg-do compile }
+! { dg-options "" }
+program test
+ implicit none
+
+!!!!!! INTEGER BASE !!!!!!
+ print *, 0**0
+ print *, 0**1
+ print *, 0**(-1) ! { dg-error "Division by zero" }
+ print *, 0**(huge(0))
+ print *, 0**(-huge(0)-1) ! { dg-error "Division by zero" }
+ print *, 0**(2_8**32)
+ print *, 0**(-(2_8**32)) ! { dg-error "Division by zero" }
+
+ print *, 1**huge(0)
+ print *, 1**(-huge(0)-1)
+ print *, 1**huge(0_8)
+ print *, 1**(-huge(0_8)-1_8)
+ print *, (-1)**huge(0)
+ print *, (-1)**(-huge(0)-1)
+ print *, (-1)**huge(0_8)
+ print *, (-1)**(-huge(0_8)-1_8)
+
+ print *, 2**huge(0) ! { dg-error "Arithmetic overflow" }
+ print *, 2**huge(0_8) ! { dg-error "Arithmetic overflow" }
+ print *, (-2)**huge(0) ! { dg-error "Arithmetic overflow" }
+ print *, (-2)**huge(0_8) ! { dg-error "Arithmetic overflow" }
+
+ print *, 2**(-huge(0)-1)
+ print *, 2**(-huge(0_8)-1_8)
+ print *, (-2)**(-huge(0)-1)
+ print *, (-2)**(-huge(0_8)-1_8)
+
+!!!!!! REAL BASE !!!!!!
+ print *, 0.0**(-1) ! { dg-error "Arithmetic overflow" }
+ print *, 0.0**(-huge(0)-1) ! { dg-error "Arithmetic overflow" }
+ print *, 2.0**huge(0) ! { dg-error "Arithmetic overflow" }
+ print *, nearest(1.0,-1.0)**(-huge(0)) ! { dg-error "Arithmetic overflow" }
+
+!!!!!! COMPLEX BASE !!!!!!
+ print *, (2.0,-4.3)**huge(0) ! { dg-error "Arithmetic NaN" }
+ print *, (2.0,-4.3)**(-huge(0)) ! { dg-error "Arithmetic NaN" }
+
+end program test
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/integer_exponentiation_5.F90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/integer_exponentiation_5.F90
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..52410f8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/integer_exponentiation_5.F90
@@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
+! { dg-do run }
+! { dg-options "-fno-range-check" }
+module mod_check
+ implicit none
+
+ interface check
+ module procedure check_i8
+ module procedure check_i4
+ module procedure check_r8
+ module procedure check_r4
+ module procedure check_c8
+ module procedure check_c4
+ end interface check
+
+contains
+
+ subroutine check_i8 (a, b)
+ integer(kind=8), intent(in) :: a, b
+ if (a /= b) call abort()
+ end subroutine check_i8
+
+ subroutine check_i4 (a, b)
+ integer(kind=4), intent(in) :: a, b
+ if (a /= b) call abort()
+ end subroutine check_i4
+
+ subroutine check_r8 (a, b)
+ real(kind=8), intent(in) :: a, b
+ if (a /= b) call abort()
+ end subroutine check_r8
+
+ subroutine check_r4 (a, b)
+ real(kind=4), intent(in) :: a, b
+ if (a /= b) call abort()
+ end subroutine check_r4
+
+ subroutine check_c8 (a, b)
+ complex(kind=8), intent(in) :: a, b
+ if (a /= b) call abort()
+ end subroutine check_c8
+
+ subroutine check_c4 (a, b)
+ complex(kind=4), intent(in) :: a, b
+ if (a /= b) call abort()
+ end subroutine check_c4
+
+end module mod_check
+
+program test
+ use mod_check
+ implicit none
+
+ integer(kind=4) :: i4
+ integer(kind=8) :: i8
+ real(kind=4) :: r4
+ real(kind=8) :: r8
+ complex(kind=4) :: c4
+ complex(kind=8) :: c8
+
+#define TEST(base,exp,var) var = base; call check((var)**(exp),(base)**(exp))
+
+!!!!! INTEGER BASE !!!!!
+ TEST(3,23,i4)
+ TEST(-3,23,i4)
+ TEST(3_8,43_8,i8)
+ TEST(-3_8,43_8,i8)
+
+ TEST(17_8,int(huge(0),kind=8)+1,i8)
+
+!!!!! REAL BASE !!!!!
+ TEST(0.0,-1,r4)
+ TEST(0.0,-huge(0)-1,r4)
+ TEST(2.0,huge(0),r4)
+ TEST(nearest(1.0,-1.0),-huge(0),r4)
+
+end program test
+
+! { dg-final { cleanup-modules "mod_check" } }