aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPatrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>2023-01-05 14:21:34 -0500
committerPatrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>2023-01-05 14:21:34 -0500
commit12b0d35ec52375da5652d2b8da74083ab700b9d7 (patch)
treeecadf0ab0e7a9d7b070a5f23921d475de7f1fcb9
parent9807c31af91326988d083436483f9577296e1f9a (diff)
downloadgcc-12b0d35ec52375da5652d2b8da74083ab700b9d7.zip
gcc-12b0d35ec52375da5652d2b8da74083ab700b9d7.tar.gz
gcc-12b0d35ec52375da5652d2b8da74083ab700b9d7.tar.bz2
c++: class-head parsing and CPP_TEMPLATE_ID access [PR108275]
When tentatively parsing what is really an elaborated-type-specifier containing a template-id first as a class-specifier, we may form a CPP_TEMPLATE_ID token that later gets reused by the fallback parse if the tentative parse fails. These special tokens also capture the access checks that have been deferred while parsing the template-id. But here we form such a token when the access check state is dk_no_check, and so the token captures no access checks. This effectively bypasses access checking for the template-id during the subsequent parse as an elaborated-type-specifier. This patch fixes this by using dk_deferred instead of dk_no_check when parsing the class name of a class-head. PR c++/108275 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * parser.cc (cp_parser_class_head): Use dk_deferred instead of dk_no_check when parsing the class name. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/parse/access14.C: New test.
-rw-r--r--gcc/cp/parser.cc23
-rw-r--r--gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/access14.C18
2 files changed, 35 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.cc b/gcc/cp/parser.cc
index bfd8aea..8b1658d 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/parser.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/parser.cc
@@ -26559,7 +26559,23 @@ cp_parser_class_head (cp_parser* parser,
if (cp_parser_global_scope_opt (parser, /*current_scope_valid_p=*/false))
qualified_p = true;
- push_deferring_access_checks (dk_no_check);
+ /* It is OK to define an inaccessible class; for example:
+
+ class A { class B; };
+ class A::B {};
+
+ So we want to ignore access when parsing the class name.
+ However, we might be tentatively parsing what is really an
+ elaborated-type-specifier naming a template-id, e.g.
+
+ struct C<&D::m> c;
+
+ In this case the tentative parse as a class-head will fail, but not
+ before cp_parser_template_id splices in a CPP_TEMPLATE_ID token.
+ Since dk_no_check is sticky, we must instead use dk_deferred so that
+ any such CPP_TEMPLATE_ID token created during this tentative parse
+ will correctly capture the access checks imposed by the template-id . */
+ push_deferring_access_checks (dk_deferred);
/* Determine the name of the class. Begin by looking for an
optional nested-name-specifier. */
@@ -26586,11 +26602,6 @@ cp_parser_class_head (cp_parser* parser,
The proposed resolution for Core Issue 180 says that wherever
you see `class T::X' you should treat `X' as a type-name.
- It is OK to define an inaccessible class; for example:
-
- class A { class B; };
- class A::B {};
-
We do not know if we will see a class-name, or a
template-name. We look for a class-name first, in case the
class-name is a template-id; if we looked for the
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/access14.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/access14.C
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..bdbc7f6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/access14.C
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+// PR c++/108275
+
+struct A {
+ int i;
+private:
+ int j;
+};
+
+template<int A::* V>
+struct B {
+ struct C { };
+private:
+ template<int N> struct D { };
+};
+
+struct B<&A::j> b; // { dg-error "private" }
+struct B<&A::j>::C c; // { dg-error "private" }
+struct B<&A::i>::D<0> d; // { dg-error "private" }