Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
This updates the copyright headers to include 2025. I did this by
running gdb/copyright.py and then manually modifying a few files as
noted by the script.
Approved-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
|
|
This commit is the result of the following actions:
- Running gdb/copyright.py to update all of the copyright headers to
include 2024,
- Manually updating a few files the copyright.py script told me to
update, these files had copyright headers embedded within the
file,
- Regenerating gdbsupport/Makefile.in to refresh it's copyright
date,
- Using grep to find other files that still mentioned 2023. If
these files were updated last year from 2022 to 2023 then I've
updated them this year to 2024.
I'm sure I've probably missed some dates. Feel free to fix them up as
you spot them.
|
|
Currently, the Fortran test suite does not run with NVIDIA's Fortran
compiler (nvfortran).
The goal here is to get the tests running and preventing further
regressions during future work. This change does not do anything to fix
existing failures.
Teach the compiler detection about nvfortran. There is no underlying
information about whether this compiler is related to flang classic or
flang, so we cannot reuse the main and type definitions. Therefore, we
explicitly record the main method and type information observed when
using nvfortran.
The main name was extracted by trying to set breakpoints on both MAIN_
and MAIN__.
The following mapping of test to type names was used to extract how
nvfortran reports types.
info-types.exp: fortran_int4, fortran_int8, fortran_real4,
fortran_logical4
common-block.exp: fortran_real8
complex.exp: fortran_complex4 fortran_complex8
logical.exp: fortran_character1. Ran ptype on "c".
Types defined as fortran_complex16 do not compile with nvfortran, so it
was left unset.
gdb.fortran regression tests run with GNU, Intel, Intel LLVM and ACfL.
No regressions detected.
The gdb.fortran test results with nvfortran 23.3 are as follows.
Before:
# of expected passes 523
# of unexpected failures 107
# of known failures 2
# of unresolved testcases 1
# of untested testcases 7
# of duplicate test names 2
After:
# of expected passes 5696
# of unexpected failures 271
# of known failures 12
# of untested testcases 9
# of unsupported tests 5
As can be seen from the above, there are now considerably more passing
assertions.
Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
|
|
This commit is the result of running the gdb/copyright.py script,
which automated the update of the copyright year range for all
source files managed by the GDB project to be updated to include
year 2023.
|
|
This commit adds a separate Fortran compiler identification mechanism to
the testsuite, similar to the existing one for C/C++. Before this
change, the options and version for the Fortran compiler specified when
running the testsuite with F90_FOR_TARGET set, was detected via its
respective C compiler. So running the testsuite as
make check TEST=gdb.fortran/*.exp CC_FOR_TARGET=gcc F90_FOR_TARGET=ifx
or even
make check TEST=gdb.fortran/*.exp F90_FOR_TARGET=ifx
would use the gcc compiler inside the procedures get_compiler_info and
test_compiler_info to identify compiler flags and the compiler version.
This could sometimes lead to unpredictable outputs. It also limited
testsuite execution to combinations where C and Fortran compiler would
come from the same family of compiers (gcc/gfortran, icc/ifort, icx/ifx,
clang/flang ..). This commit enables GDB to detect C and Fortran
compilers independently of each other.
As most/nearly all Fortran compilers have a mechanism for preprocessing
files in a C like fashion we added the exact same meachnism that already
existed for C/CXX. We let GDB preprocess a file with the compilers
Fortran preprocessor and evaluate the preprocessor defined macros in that
file.
This enables GDB to properly run heterogeneous combinations of C and
Fortran compilers such as
CC_FOR_TARGET='gcc' and F90_FOR_TARGET='ifort'
or enables one to run the testsuite without specifying a C compiler as in
make check TESTS=gdb.fortran/*.exp F90_FOR_TARGET='ifx'
make check TESTS=gdb.fortran/*.exp F90_FOR_TARGET='flang'
On the other hand this also requires one to always specify a
identification mechanism for Fortran compilers in the compiler.F90 file.
We added identification for GFORTRAN, FLANG (CLASSIC and LLVM) IFX,
IFORT, and ARMFLANG for now.
Classic and LLVM flang were each tested with their latest releases on
their respective release pages. Both get recognized by the new compiler
identification and we introduced the two names flang-classic and
flang-llvm to distinguish the two. While LLVM flang is not quite mature
enough yet for running the testsuite we still thought it would be a good
idea to include it already. For this we added a case for the fortran_main
procedure. LLVM flang uses 'MAIN__' as opposed to classic flang which
uses 'MAIN_' here.
We did not have the possibility to test ARMFLANG - the versioning scheme
here was extracted from its latest online documentation.
We changed the test_compiler_info procedure to take another optional
argument, the language string, which will be passed though to the
get_compiler_info procedure. Passing 'f90' or 'c++' here will then
trigger the C++/Fortran compiler identification within
get_compiler_info. The latter procedure was extended to also handle
the 'f90' argument (similarly to the already existing 'c++' one).
Co-authored-by: Nils-Christian Kempke <nils-christian.kempke@intel.com>
|