| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
This commit is the result of the following actions:
- Running gdb/copyright.py to update all of the copyright headers to
include 2024,
- Manually updating a few files the copyright.py script told me to
update, these files had copyright headers embedded within the
file,
- Regenerating gdbsupport/Makefile.in to refresh it's copyright
date,
- Using grep to find other files that still mentioned 2023. If
these files were updated last year from 2022 to 2023 then I've
updated them this year to 2024.
I'm sure I've probably missed some dates. Feel free to fix them up as
you spot them.
|
|
This commit is the result of running the gdb/copyright.py script,
which automated the update of the copyright year range for all
source files managed by the GDB project to be updated to include
year 2023.
|
|
This commit brings all the changes made by running gdb/copyright.py
as per GDB's Start of New Year Procedure.
For the avoidance of doubt, all changes in this commits were
performed by the script.
|
|
Without any explicit dependencies specified, the observers attached
to the 'gdb::observers::new_objfile' observable are always notified
in the order in which they have been attached.
The new_objfile observer callback to auto-load scripts is attached in
'_initialize_auto_load'.
The new_objfile observer callback that propagates the new_objfile event
to the Python side is attached in 'gdbpy_initialize_inferior', which is
called via '_initialize_python'.
With '_initialize_python' happening before '_initialize_auto_load',
the consequence was that the new_objfile event was emitted on the Python
side before autoloaded scripts had been executed when a new objfile was
loaded.
As a result, trying to access the objfile's pretty printers (defined in
the autoloaded script) from a handler for the Python-side
'new_objfile' event would fail. Those would only be initialized later on
(when the 'auto_load_new_objfile' callback was called).
To make sure that the objfile passed to the Python event handler
is properly initialized (including its 'pretty_printers' member),
make sure that the 'auto_load_new_objfile' observer is notified
before the 'python_new_objfile' one that propagates the event
to the Python side.
To do this, make use of the mechanism to explicitly specify
dependencies between observers (introduced in a preparatory commit).
Add a corresponding testcase that involves a test library with an autoloaded
Python script and a handler for the Python 'new_objfile' event.
(The real world use case where I came across this issue was in an attempt
to extend handling for GDB pretty printers for dynamically loaded
objfiles in the Qt Creator IDE, s. [1] and [2] for more background.)
[1] https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTCREATORBUG-25339
[2] https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt-creator/qt-creator/+/333857/1
Tested on x86_64-linux (Debian testing).
gdb/ChangeLog:
* gdb/auto-load.c (_initialize_auto_load): 'Specify token
when attaching the 'auto_load_new_objfile' observer, so
other observers can specify it as a dependency.
* gdb/auto-load.h (struct token): Declare
'auto_load_new_objfile_observer_token' as token to be used
for the 'auto_load_new_objfile' observer.
* gdb/python/py-inferior.c (gdbpy_initialize_inferior): Make
'python_new_objfile' observer depend on 'auto_load_new_objfile'
observer, so it gets notified after the latter.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gdb.python/libpy-autoloaded-pretty-printers-in-newobjfile-event.so-gdb.py: New test.
* gdb.python/py-autoloaded-pretty-printers-in-newobjfile-event-lib.cc: New test.
* gdb.python/py-autoloaded-pretty-printers-in-newobjfile-event-lib.h: New test.
* gdb.python/py-autoloaded-pretty-printers-in-newobjfile-event-main.cc: New test.
* gdb.python/py-autoloaded-pretty-printers-in-newobjfile-event.exp: New test.
* gdb.python/py-autoloaded-pretty-printers-in-newobjfile-event.py: New test.
Change-Id: I8275b3f4c3bec32e56dd7892f9a59d89544edf89
|
