aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb/testsuite/gdb.modula2/multidim.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2024-01-12Update copyright year range in header of all files managed by GDBAndrew Burgess1-1/+1
This commit is the result of the following actions: - Running gdb/copyright.py to update all of the copyright headers to include 2024, - Manually updating a few files the copyright.py script told me to update, these files had copyright headers embedded within the file, - Regenerating gdbsupport/Makefile.in to refresh it's copyright date, - Using grep to find other files that still mentioned 2023. If these files were updated last year from 2022 to 2023 then I've updated them this year to 2024. I'm sure I've probably missed some dates. Feel free to fix them up as you spot them.
2023-01-01Update copyright year range in header of all files managed by GDBJoel Brobecker1-1/+1
This commit is the result of running the gdb/copyright.py script, which automated the update of the copyright year range for all source files managed by the GDB project to be updated to include year 2023.
2022-01-01Automatic Copyright Year update after running gdb/copyright.pyJoel Brobecker1-1/+1
This commit brings all the changes made by running gdb/copyright.py as per GDB's Start of New Year Procedure. For the avoidance of doubt, all changes in this commits were performed by the script.
2021-01-01Update copyright year range in all GDB filesJoel Brobecker1-1/+1
This commits the result of running gdb/copyright.py as per our Start of New Year procedure... gdb/ChangeLog Update copyright year range in copyright header of all GDB files.
2020-09-13gdb/testsuite: Explicitly return from mainPedro Alves1-0/+2
I've been playing with a board file that forces every testcase to include a header file that does something like: #define main __gdb_testcase_main and then links an actual main() function that does some initialization and then jumps to __gdb_testcase_main. That runs into a number of testcases relying on main not having an explicit return statement, like e.g.,: gdb/build/gdb/testsuite/../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/catch-follow-exec.c:27:1: warning: non-void function does not return a value [-Wreturn-type] gdb/build/gdb/testsuite/../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/catch-signal.c:47:1: warning: non-void function does not return a value [-Wreturn-type] We don't get those warnings without my board because it is valid to not explicitly return from main. There's an implicit "return 0;". Since it doesn't hurt to be explicit, I've went ahead and added the explicit return statements. Also, a couple testcases either don't explicitly specify main's return type, or return void. Those are tweaked to explicitly return int. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gdb.base/catch-follow-exec.c (main): Add explicit return statement. * gdb.base/catch-signal.c (main): Likewise. * gdb.base/condbreak-call-false.c (main): Likewise. * gdb.base/consecutive.c (main): Add explicit return statement and return type. * gdb.base/cursal.c (main): Add explicit return statement. * gdb.base/cvexpr.c (main): Likewise. * gdb.base/display.c (main): Add explicit return statement and return type. * gdb.base/dprintf-detach.c (main): Add explicit return statement. * gdb.base/endianity.c (main): Likewise. * gdb.base/execd-prog.c (main): Likewise. * gdb.base/gdb1090.c (main): Likewise. * gdb.base/info_qt.c (main): Likewise. * gdb.base/lineinc.c (main): Likewise. * gdb.base/load-command.c (main): Likewise. * gdb.base/macscp1.c (main): Likewise. * gdb.base/pr10179-a.c (main): Likewise. * gdb.base/quit-live.c (main): Likewise. * gdb.base/scope0.c (main): Likewise. * gdb.base/settings.c (main): Likewise. * gdb.base/stack-checking.c (main): Return int. * gdb.base/varargs.c (main): Add explicit return statement. * gdb.cp/ambiguous.cc (main): Likewise. * gdb.cp/anon-struct.cc (main): Likewise. * gdb.cp/anon-union.cc (main): Likewise. * gdb.cp/bool.cc (main): Likewise. * gdb.cp/bs15503.cc (main): Likewise. * gdb.cp/cplusfuncs.cc (main): Likewise. * gdb.cp/cttiadd.cc (main): Likewise. * gdb.cp/extern-c.cc (main): Likewise. * gdb.cp/filename.cc (main): Likewise. * gdb.cp/formatted-ref.cc (main): Likewise. * gdb.cp/mb-ctor.cc (main): Likewise. * gdb.cp/member-ptr.cc (main): Likewise. * gdb.cp/minsym-fallback-main.cc (main): Likewise. * gdb.cp/overload-const.cc (main): Likewise. * gdb.cp/paren-type.cc (main): Likewise. * gdb.cp/parse-lang.cc (main): Likewise. * gdb.cp/pr-1023.cc (main): Likewise. * gdb.cp/psmang1.cc (main): Likewise. * gdb.cp/readnow-language.cc (main): Likewise. * gdb.cp/ref-params.cc (main): Likewise. * gdb.cp/rvalue-ref-params.cc (main): Likewise. * gdb.cp/virtbase2.cc (main): Likewise. * gdb.dwarf2/dw2-abs-hi-pc.c (main): Likewise. * gdb.dwarf2/dw2-namespaceless-anonymous.c (main): Likewise. * gdb.dwarf2/dw4-toplevel-types.cc (main): Likewise. * gdb.mi/mi-console.c (main): Likewise. * gdb.mi/mi-read-memory.c (main): Likewise. * gdb.modula2/multidim.c (main): Likewise. * gdb.opt/inline-small-func.c (main): Likewise. * gdb.python/py-rbreak.c (main): Likewise. * gdb.stabs/exclfwd1.c (main): Likewise. * gdb.trace/qtro.c (main): Likewise.
2020-08-25gdb/modula-2: parsing of multi-subscript arraysGaius Mulley1-0/+39
Fix bug PR m2/26372, GDB's inability to parse multi-dimensional modula-2 arrays. We previously had two rules for handling the parsing of array sub-scripts. I have reproduced them here with the actual handler blocks removed to make the bug clearer: exp : exp '[' non_empty_arglist ']' ; exp : exp '[' exp ']' ; non_empty_arglist : exp ; non_empty_arglist : non_empty_arglist ',' exp ; This is ambiguous as the pattern "exp '[' exp" could match either of the 'exp' rules. Currently it just so happens that the parser picks the second 'exp' rule which means we can only handle a single array index. As the handler code for the first 'exp' pattern will correctly handle and number of array indexes then lets just remove the second pattern. gdb/ChangeLog: PR m2/26372 * m2-exp.y (exp): Improve comment for non_empty_arglist case, add an assert. Remove single element array indexing pattern as the MULTI_SUBSCRIPT support will handle this case too. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR m2/26372 * gdb.modula2/multidim.c: New file. * gdb.modula2/multidim.exp: New file.
2020-08-25Revert "Fix for Bug 26372 [Modula-2] Parsing of multi-subscript arrays"Andrew Burgess1-39/+0
This reverts commit 07758bdfa9e5a762f2ec0deeb51b11d6ad5fe376.
2020-08-25Fix for Bug 26372 [Modula-2] Parsing of multi-subscript arraysGaius Mulley1-0/+39
Here is a bugfix for Pr 26372 [Modula-2] Parsing of multi-subscript arrays. Also included is a dejagnu testcase. No extra regressions are caused on Debian GNU/Linux Buster amd64. gdb/ChangeLog: 2020-08-25 Gaius Mulley <gaiusmod2@gmail.com> PR m2/26372 * m2-exp.y: Rewrite array subscript rules to support multidimension array access. (ArgumentList) replaces non_empty_arglist. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2020-08-25 Gaius Mulley <gaiusmod2@gmail.com> PR m2/26372 * testsuite/gdb.modula2/multidim.exp: New file. * testsuite/gdb.modula2/multidim.c: New file.