|
Kévin discovered that commit ba005d32b0f ("Handle dynamic field
properties") regressed a test in the internal AdaCore test suite.
The problem here is that, when writing that patch, I did not consider
the case where an array type's bounds might come from a member of a
structure -- but where the array is not defined in the structure's
scope.
In this scenario the field-resolution logic would trip this condition:
/* Defensive programming in case we see unusual DWARF. */
if (fi == nullptr)
return nullptr;
This patch reworks this area, partly backing out that commit, and
fixes the problem.
In the new code, I chose to simply duplicate the field's location
information. This isn't totally ideal, in that it might result in
multiple copies of a baton. However, this seemed nicer than tracking
the DIE/field correspondence for every field in every CU -- my
thinking here is that this particular dynamic scenario is relatively
rare overall. Also, if the baton cost does prove onerous, we could
intern the batons somewhere.
Regression tested on x86-64 Fedora 41. I also tested this using the
AdaCore internal test suite.
Tested-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
|
