aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb/testsuite/gdb.ada/display_nested
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2024-01-12Update copyright year range in header of all files managed by GDBAndrew Burgess3-3/+3
This commit is the result of the following actions: - Running gdb/copyright.py to update all of the copyright headers to include 2024, - Manually updating a few files the copyright.py script told me to update, these files had copyright headers embedded within the file, - Regenerating gdbsupport/Makefile.in to refresh it's copyright date, - Using grep to find other files that still mentioned 2023. If these files were updated last year from 2022 to 2023 then I've updated them this year to 2024. I'm sure I've probably missed some dates. Feel free to fix them up as you spot them.
2023-01-01Update copyright year range in header of all files managed by GDBJoel Brobecker3-3/+3
This commit is the result of running the gdb/copyright.py script, which automated the update of the copyright year range for all source files managed by the GDB project to be updated to include year 2023.
2022-01-01Automatic Copyright Year update after running gdb/copyright.pyJoel Brobecker3-3/+3
This commit brings all the changes made by running gdb/copyright.py as per GDB's Start of New Year Procedure. For the avoidance of doubt, all changes in this commits were performed by the script.
2021-01-01Update copyright year range in all GDB filesJoel Brobecker3-3/+3
This commits the result of running gdb/copyright.py as per our Start of New Year procedure... gdb/ChangeLog Update copyright year range in copyright header of all GDB files.
2020-01-01Update copyright year range in all GDB files.Joel Brobecker3-3/+3
gdb/ChangeLog: Update copyright year range in all GDB files.
2019-07-30Allow nested function displaysTom Tromey3-0/+73
In Ada, it's possible to have nested functions. However, block.c:contained_in does not recognize this. Normally, this is no problem, but if gdb is stopped inside a nested function, then you can end up in the unexpected situation that "print" of an expression will work, whereas "display" of the same expression will not -- because contained_in returns 0. This patch simply removes the BLOCK_FUNCTION check from contained_in. The rationale here is that in languages without nested functions, this will not cause any issues. gdb/ChangeLog 2019-07-30 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com> * block.c (contained_in): Remove BLOCK_FUNCTION check. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog 2019-07-30 Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com> * gdb.ada/display_nested.exp: New file. * gdb.ada/display_nested/foo.adb: New file. * gdb.ada/display_nested/pack.adb: New file. * gdb.ada/display_nested/pack.ads: New file.