aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb/python
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
8 daysChange file initialization to use INIT_GDB_FILE macroTom Tromey6-18/+6
This patch introduces a new macro, INIT_GDB_FILE. This is used to replace the current "_initialize_" idiom when introducing a per-file initialization function. That is, rather than write: void _initialize_something (); void _initialize_something () { ... } ... now you would write: INIT_GDB_FILE (something) { ... } The macro handles both the declaration and definition of the function. The point of this approach is that it makes it harder to accidentally cause an initializer to be omitted; see commit 2711e475 ("Ensure cooked_index_entry self-tests are run"). Specifically, the regexp now used by make-init-c seems harder to trick. New in v2: un-did some erroneous changes made by the script. The bulk of this patch was written by script. Regression tested on x86-64 Fedora 41.
10 daysAllow DAP "threads" request when inferior is runningTom Tromey1-9/+14
A user pointed out that DAP allows the "threads" request to work when the inferior is running. This is documented in the overview, not the specification. While looking into this, I found a few other issues: * The _thread_name function was not marked @in_gdb_thread. This isn't very important but is still an oversight. * DAP requires all threads to have a name -- the field is not optional in the "Thread" type. * There was no test examining events resulting from the inferior printing to stdout. This patch fixes all these problems. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33080
2025-06-19gdb/python: introduce gdb.warning() functionAndrew Burgess1-0/+40
This commit adds a new gdb.warning() function. This function takes a string and then calls GDB's internal warning() function. This will display the string as a warning. Using gdb.warning() means that the message will get the new emoji prefix if the user has that feature turned on. Also, the message will be sent to gdb.STDERR without the user having to remember to print to the correct stream. Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-06-17gdb/dap: allow more requests when the process is runningoltolm1-3/+3
Makes it possible to set and remove other types of breakpoints while the process is running. Makes debugging more convenient. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-06-12Minor grammar fix in DAP commentTom Tromey1-1/+1
I noticed a minor grammer issue in a comment in DAP.
2025-06-06gdb/python/guile: remove some explicit calls to xmallocAndrew Burgess1-3/+2
In gdbpy_parse_command_name (python/py-cmd.c) there is a call to xmalloc that can easily be replaced with a call to make_unique_xstrndup, which makes the code easier to read (I think). In gdbscm_parse_command_name (guile/scm-cmd.c) the same fix can be applied to remove an identical xmalloc call. And there is an additional xmalloc call, which can also be replaced with make_unique_xstrndup in the same way. The second xmalloc call in gdbscm_parse_command_name was also present in gdbpy_parse_command_name at one point, but was replaced with a use of std::string by this commit: commit 075c55e0cc0a68eeab777027213c2f545618e844 Date: Wed Dec 26 11:05:57 2018 -0700 Remove more calls to xfree from Python I haven't changed the gdbscm_parse_command_name to use std::string though, as that doesn't work well with the guile exception model. Guile exceptions work by performing a longjmp from the function that raises the exception, back to the guile run-time. The consequence of this is that destructors are not run. For example, if gdbscm_parse_command_name calls gdbscm_out_of_range_error, then any function local objects in gdbscm_parse_command_name will not have their destructors called. What this means is that, for the existing `result` and `prefix_text` locals, any allocated memory managed by these objects will be leaked if an exception is called. However, fixing this is pretty easy, one way is to just assign nullptr to these locals before raising the exception, this would cause the allocated memory to be released. But for std::string it is harder to ensure that the managed memory has actually been released. We can call std::string::clear() and then maybe std::string::shrink_to_fit(), but this is still not guaranteed to release any managed memory. In fact, I believe the only way to ensure all managed memory is released, is to call the std::string destructor. And so, for functions that can throw a guile exception, it is easier to just avoid std::string. As for the memory leak that I identify above; I'll fix that in a follow on commit. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-06-04gdb/python/guile: fix segfault from nested prefix command creationAndrew Burgess2-10/+23
A commit I recently pushed: commit 0b5023cc71d3af8b18e10e6599a3f9381bc15265 Date: Sat Apr 12 09:15:53 2025 +0100 gdb/python/guile: user created prefix commands get help list can trigger a segfault if a user tries to create nested prefix commands. For example, this will trigger a crash: (gdb) python gdb.ParameterPrefix("prefix-1", gdb.COMMAND_NONE) (gdb) python gdb.ParameterPrefix("prefix-1 prefix-2", gdb.COMMAND_NONE) Fatal signal: Segmentation fault ... etc ... If the user adds an actual parameter under 'prefix-1' before creating 'prefix-2', then everything is fine: (gdb) python gdb.ParameterPrefix("prefix-1", gdb.COMMAND_NONE) (gdb) python gdb.Parameter('prefix-1 param-1', gdb.COMMAND_NONE, gdb.PARAM_BOOLEAN) (gdb) python gdb.ParameterPrefix("prefix-1 prefix-2", gdb.COMMAND_NONE) The mistake in the above patch is in how gdbpy_parse_command_name is used. The BASE_LIST output argument from this function points to the list of commands for the prefix, not to the prefix command itself. So when gdbpy_parse_command_name is called for 'prefix-1 prefix-2', BASE_LIST points to the list of commands associated with 'prefix-1', not to the actual 'prefix-1' cmd_list_element. Back in cmdpy_init, from where gdbpy_parse_command_name was called, I was walking back from the first entry in BASE_LIST to figure out if this was a "show" prefix command or not. However, if BASE_LIST is empty then there is no first item, and this would trigger the segfault. The solution it to extend gdbpy_parse_command_name to also return the prefix cmd_list_element in addition to the existing values. With this done, and cmdpy_init updated, the segfault is now avoided. There's a new test that would trigger the crash without the patch. And, of course, the above commit also broke guile in the exact same way. And the fix is exactly the same. And there's a guile test too. NOTE: We should investigate possibly sharing some of this boiler plate helper code between Python and Guile. But not in this commit. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-06-03gdb/python/guile: user created prefix commands get help listAndrew Burgess1-24/+57
Consider GDB's builtin prefix set/show prefix sub-commands, if they are invoked with no sub-command name then they work like this: (gdb) show print print address: Printing of addresses is on. print array: Pretty formatting of arrays is off. print array-indexes: Printing of array indexes is off. print asm-demangle: Demangling of C++/ObjC names in disassembly listings is off. ... cut lots of lines ... (gdb) set print List of set print subcommands: set print address -- Set printing of addresses. set print array -- Set pretty formatting of arrays. set print array-indexes -- Set printing of array indexes. set print asm-demangle -- Set demangling of C++/ObjC names in disassembly listings. ... cut lots of lines ... Type "help set print" followed by set print subcommand name for full documentation. Type "apropos word" to search for commands related to "word". Type "apropos -v word" for full documentation of commands related to "word". Command name abbreviations are allowed if unambiguous. (gdb) That is 'show print' lists the values of all settings under the 'print' prefix, and 'set print' lists the help text for all settings under the 'set print' prefix. Now, if we try to create something similar using the Python API: (gdb) python gdb.ParameterPrefix("my-prefix", gdb.COMMAND_NONE) (gdb) python gdb.Parameter("my-prefix foo", gdb.COMMAND_OBSCURE, gdb.PARAM_BOOLEAN) (gdb) show my-prefix (gdb) set my-prefix Neither 'show my-prefix' or 'set my-prefix' gives us the same details relating to the sub-commands that we get with the builtin prefix commands. This commit aims to address this. Currently, in cmdpy_init, when a new command is created, we always set the commands callback function to cmdpy_function. It is within cmdpy_function that we spot that the command is a prefix command, and that there is no gdb.Command.invoke method, and so return early. This commit changes things so that the rules are now: 1. For NON prefix commands, we continue to use cmdpy_function. 2. For prefix commands that do have a gdb.Command.invoke method (i.e. can handle unknown sub-commands), continue to use cmdpy_function. 3. For all other prefix commands, don't use cmdpy_function, instead use GDB's normal callback function for set/show prefixes. This requires splitting the current call to add_prefix_cmd into either a call to add_prefix_cmd, add_show_prefix_cmd, or add_basic_prefix_cmd, as appropriate. After these changes, we now see this: (gdb) python gdb.ParameterPrefix("my-prefix", gdb.COMMAND_NONE) │ (gdb) python gdb.Parameter("my-prefix foo", gdb.COMMAND_OBSCURE, gdb.PARAM_BOOLEAN) (gdb) show my-prefix │ my-prefix foo: The current value of 'my-prefix foo' is "off". (gdb) set my-prefix List of "set my-prefix" subcommands: set my-prefix foo -- Set the current value of 'my-prefix foo'. Type "help set my-prefix" followed by subcommand name for full documentation. Type "apropos word" to search for commands related to "word". Type "apropos -v word" for full documentation of commands related to "word". Command name abbreviations are allowed if unambiguous. (gdb) Which matches how a prefix defined within GDB would act. I have made the same changes to the Guile API.
2025-06-03Handle dynamic DW_AT_data_bit_offsetTom Tromey1-1/+1
In Ada, a field can have a dynamic bit offset in its enclosing record. In DWARF 3, this was handled using a dynamic DW_AT_data_member_location, combined with a DW_AT_bit_offset -- this combination worked out ok because in practice GNAT only needs a dynamic byte offset with a fixed offset within the byte. However, this approach was deprecated in DWARF 4 and then removed in DWARF 5. No replacement approach was given, meaning that in strict mode there is no way to express this. This is a DWARF bug, see https://dwarfstd.org/issues/250501.1.html In a discussion on the DWARF mailing list, a couple people mentioned that compilers could use the obvious extension of a dynamic DW_AT_data_bit_offset. I've implemented this for LLVM: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141106 In preparation for that landing, this patch implements support for this construct in gdb. New in v2: renamed some constants and added a helper method, per Simon's review. New in v3: more renamings. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2025-06-02Fix DAP defer_stop_events implementationTom Tromey4-53/+62
DAP requests have a "defer_stop_events" option that is intended to defer the emission of any "stopped" event until after the current request completes. This was needed to handle async continues like "finish &". However, I noticed that sometimes DAP tests can fail, because a stop event does arrive before the response to the "stepOut" request. I've only noticed this when the machine is fairly loaded -- for instance when I'm regression-testing a series, it may occur in some of the tests mid-series. I believe the problem is that the implementation in the "request" function is incorrect -- the flag is set when "request" is invoked, but instead it must be deferred until the request itself is run. That is, the setting must be captured in one of the wrapper functions. Following up on this, Simon pointed out that introducing a delay before sending a request's response will cause test case failures. That is, there's a race here that is normally hidden. Investigation showed that that deferred requests can't force event deferral. This patch implements this; but more testing showed many more race failures. Some of these are due to how the test suite is written. Anyway, in the end I took the radical approach of deferring all events by default. Most DAP requests are asynchronous by nature, so this seemed ok. The only case I found that really required this is pause.exp, where the test (rightly) expects to see a 'continued' event while performing an inferior function call. I went through all events and all requests and tried to convince myself that this patch will cause acceptable behavior in every case. However, it's hard to be completely sure about this approach. Maybe there are cases that do still need an event before the response, but we just don't have tests for them. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32685 Acked-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2025-06-02[gdb/python] Reimplement F405 fixTom de Vries1-10/+20
At commit 34b0776fd73^, flake8 reports the following F405 warnings: ... $ pre-commit run flake8 --file gdb/python/lib/gdb/__init__.py flake8...................................................................Failed - hook id: flake8 - exit code: 1 F405 'flush' may be undefined, or defined from star imports: _gdb F405 'write' may be undefined, or defined from star imports: _gdb F405 'STDOUT' may be undefined, or defined from star imports: _gdb F405 'STDERR' may be undefined, or defined from star imports: _gdb ... F405 'selected_inferior' may be undefined, or defined from star imports: _gdb F405 'execute' may be undefined, or defined from star imports: _gdb F405 'parameter' may be undefined, or defined from star imports: _gdb ... The F405s are addressed by commit 34b0776fd73 ('Suppress some "undefined" warnings from flake8'). The problem indicated by the first F405 is that the use of flush here: ... class _GdbFile(object): ... def flush(self): flush(stream=self.stream) ... cannot be verified by flake8. It concludes that either, flush is undefined, or it is defined by this "star import": ... from _gdb import * # noqa: F401,F403 ... In this particular case, indeed flush is defined by the star import. This can be addressed by simply adding: ... flush(stream=self.stream) # noqa: F405 ... but that has only effect for flake8, so other analyzers may report the same problem. The commit 34b0776fd73 addresses it instead by adding an "import _gdb" and adding a "_gdb." prefix: ... _gdb.flush(stream=self.stream) ... This introduces a second way to specify _gdb names, but the first one still remains, and occasionally someone will use the first one, which then requires fixing once flake8 is run [1]. While this works to silence the warnings, there is a problem: if a developer makes a typo: ... _gdb.flash(stream=self.stream) ... this is not detected by flake8. This matters because although the python import already complains: ... $ gdb -q -batch -ex "python import gdb" Exception ignored in: <gdb._GdbFile object at 0x7f6186d4d7f0> Traceback (most recent call last): File "__init__.py", line 63, in flush _gdb.flash(stream=self.stream) AttributeError: module '_gdb' has no attribute 'flash' ... that doesn't trigger if the code is hidden behind some control flow: ... if _var_mostly_false: flash(stream=self.stream) ... Instead, fix the F405s by reverting commit 34b0776fd73 and adding a second import of _gdb alongside the star import which lists the names used locally: ... from _gdb import * # noqa: F401,F403 +from _gdb import ( + STDERR, + STDOUT, + Command, + execute, + flush, + parameter, + selected_inferior, + write, +) ... This gives the following warnings for the flash typo: ... 31:1: F401 '_gdb.flush' imported but unused 70:5: F811 redefinition of unused 'flush' from line 31 71:9: F405 'flash' may be undefined, or defined from star imports: _gdb ... The benefits of this approach compared to the previous one are that: - the typo is noticed, and - when using a new name, the F405 fix needs to be done once (by adding it to the explicit import list), while previously the fix had to be applied to each use (by adding the "_gdb." prefix). Tested on x86_64-linux. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> [1] Commit 475799b692e ("Fix some pre-commit nits in gdb/__init__.py")
2025-05-30Require Python 3.4Tom Tromey3-21/+3
I believe we previously agreed that the minimum supported Python version should be 3.4. This patch makes this change, harmonizing the documentation (which was inconsistent about the minimum version) and the code. New in v2: rebased, and removed a pre-3.4 workaround from __init__.py. Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> Approved-by: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com> Acked-By: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31870
2025-05-29gdb/dap: fix completion request for empty stringsJorenar1-2/+5
When DAP completion requests receives empty string to complete, the script crashes due trying to access element -1 from list being a result of `text.splitlines()` (which for `text == ""` evaluates into empty list). This patch adds simple check if `text` is populated, and when it is not, skips transformations and assigns correct result directly. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-05-15gdb: rename ldirname to gdb_ldirnameAndreas Schwab1-1/+1
It conflicts with the ldirname function that will be added in the next libiberty sync.
2025-05-14Fix some pre-commit nits in gdb/__init__.pyTom Tromey1-3/+3
I noticed that pre-commit has some complaints (flake8 and codespell) about gdb/__init__.py. This patch fixes these. Approved-By: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
2025-05-13gdb/python: new gdb.ParameterPrefix classAndrew Burgess1-0/+118
This commit adds a new gdb.ParameterPrefix class to GDB's Python API. When creating multiple gdb.Parameters, it is often desirable to group these together under a sub-command, for example, 'set print' has lots of parameters nested under it, like 'set print address', and 'set print symbol'. In the Python API the 'print' part of these commands are called prefix commands, and are created using gdb.Command objects. However, as parameters are set via the 'set ....' command list, and shown through the 'show ....' command list, creating a prefix for a parameter usually requires two prefix commands to be created, one for the 'set' command, and one for the 'show' command. This often leads to some duplication, or at the very least, each user will end up creating their own helper class to simplify creation of the two prefix commands. This commit adds a new gdb.ParameterPrefix class. Creating a single instance of this class will create both the 'set' and 'show' prefix commands, which can then be used while creating the gdb.Parameter. Here is an example of it in use: gdb.ParameterPrefix('my-prefix', gdb.COMMAND_NONE) This adds 'set my-prefix' and 'show my-prefix', both of which are prefix commands. The user can then add gdb.Parameter objects under these prefixes. The gdb.ParameterPrefix initialise method also supports documentation strings, so we can write: gdb.ParameterPrefix('my-prefix', gdb.COMMAND_NONE, "Configuration setting relating to my special extension.") which will set the documentation string for the prefix command. Also, it is possible to support prefix commands that use the `invoke` functionality to handle unknown sub-commands. This is done by sub-classing gdb.ParameterPrefix and overriding either 'invoke_set' or 'invoke_show' to handle the 'set' or 'show' prefix command respectively. Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
2025-05-13gdb/python: allow empty gdb.Parameter.__doc__ stringAndrew Burgess1-1/+17
I was recently attempting to create some parameters via the Python API. I wanted these parameters to appear similar to how GDB handles the existing 'style' parameters. Specifically, I was interested in this behaviour: (gdb) help show style filename foreground Show the foreground color for this property. (gdb) help set style filename foreground Set the foreground color for this property. (gdb) Notice how each 'help' command only gets a single line of output. I tried to reproduce this behaviour via the Python API and was unable. The problem is that, in order to get just a single line of output like this, the style parameters are registered with a call to add_setshow_color_cmd with the 'help_doc' being passed as nullptr. On the Python side, when parameters are created, the 'help_doc' is obtained with a call to get_doc_string (python/py-param.c). This function either returns the __doc__ string, or a default string: "This command is not documented.". To avoid returning the default we could try setting __doc__ to an empty string, but setting this field to any string means that GDB prints a line for that string, like this: class test_param(gdb.Parameter): __doc__ = "" def __init__(self, name): super ().__init__(name, gdb.COMMAND_NONE, gdb.PARAM_BOOLEAN) self.value = True test_param('print test') Then in GDB: (gdb) help set print test Set the current value of 'print test'. (gdb) The blank line is the problem I'd like to solve. This commit makes a couple of changes to how parameter doc strings are handled. If the doc string is set to an empty string, then GDB now converts this to nullptr, which removes the blank line problem, the new behaviour in GDB (for the above `test_param`) is: (gdb) help set print test Set the current value of 'print test'. (gdb) Next, I noticed that if the set/show docs are set to empty strings, then the results are less than ideal: class test_param(gdb.Parameter): set_doc = "" def __init__(self, name): super ().__init__(name, gdb.COMMAND_NONE, gdb.PARAM_BOOLEAN) self.value = True test_param('print test') And in GDB: (gdb) help set print test This command is not documented. (gdb) So, if the set/show docs are the empty string, GDB now forces these to be the default string instead, the new behaviour in GDB is: (gdb) help set print test Set the current value of 'print test'. This command is not documented. (gdb) I've added some additional asserts; the set/show docs should always be non-empty strings, which I believe is the case after this commit. And the 'doc' string returned from get_doc_string should never nullptr, but could be empty. There are new tests to cover all these changes.
2025-05-13gdb/python/guile: check for invalid prefixes in Command/Parameter creationAndrew Burgess1-1/+1
The manual for gdb.Parameter says: If NAME consists of multiple words, and no prefix parameter group can be found, an exception is raised. This makes sense; we cannot create a parameter within a prefix group, if the prefix doesn't exist. And this almost works, so: (gdb) python gdb.Parameter("xxx foo", gdb.COMMAND_NONE, gdb.PARAM_BOOLEAN) Python Exception <class 'RuntimeError'>: Could not find command prefix xxx. Error occurred in Python: Could not find command prefix xxx. The prefix 'xxx' doesn't exist, and we get an error. But, if we try multiple levels of prefix: (gdb) python gdb.Parameter("print xxx foo", gdb.COMMAND_NONE, gdb.PARAM_BOOLEAN) This completes without error, however, we didn't get what we were maybe expecting: (gdb) show print xxx foo Undefined show print command: "xxx foo". Try "help show print". But we did get: (gdb) show print foo The current value of 'print foo' is "off". GDB stopped scanning the prefix string at the unknown 'xxx', and just created the parameter there. I don't think this makes sense, nor is it inline with the manual. An identical problem exists with gdb.Command creation; GDB stops parsing the prefix at the first unknown prefix, and just creates the command there. The manual for gdb.Command says: NAME is the name of the command. If NAME consists of multiple words, then the initial words are looked for as prefix commands. In this case, if one of the prefix commands does not exist, an exception is raised. So again, the correct action is, I believe, to raise an exception. The problem is in gdbpy_parse_command_name (python/py-cmd.c), GDB calls lookup_cmd_1 to look through the prefix string and return the last prefix group. If the very first prefix word is invalid then lookup_cmd_1 returns NULL, and this case is handled. However, if there is a valid prefix, followed by an invalid prefix, then lookup_cmd_1 will return a pointer to the last valid prefix list, and will update the input argument to point to the start of the invalid prefix word. This final case, where the input is left pointing to an unknown prefix, was previously not handled. I've fixed gdbpy_parse_command_name, and added tests for command and parameter creation to cover this case. The exact same error is present in the guile API too. The guile documentation for make-parameter and make-command says the same things about unknown prefixes resulting in an exception, but the same error is present in gdbscm_parse_command_name (guile/scm-cmd.c), so I've fixed that too, and added some tests.
2025-05-12gdb/dap: fix decode_sourceoltolm1-3/+3
The documentation for the Source interface says * The path of the source to be shown in the UI. * It is only used to locate and load the content of the source if no * `sourceReference` is specified (or its value is 0). but the code used `path` first. I fixed it to use `sourceReference` first. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-05-06gdb/python/guile: check if styling is disabled in Color.escape_sequenceAndrew Burgess1-2/+7
I noticed that the gdb.Color.escape_sequence() method would produce an escape sequence even when styling is disabled. I think this is the wrong choice. Ideally, when styling is disabled (e.g. with 'set style enabled off'), GDB should not be producing styled output. If a GDB extension is using gdb.Color to apply styling to the output, then currently, the extension should be checking 'show style enabled' any time Color.escape_sequence() is used. This means lots of code duplication, and the possibility that some locations will be missed, which means disabling styling no longer does what it says. I propose that Color.escape_sequence() should return the empty string if styling is disabled. A Python extension can then do: python c_none = gdb.Color('none') c_red = gdb.Color('red') print(c_red.escape_sequence(True) + "Text in red." + c_none.escape_sequence(True)) end If styling is enable this will print some red text. And if styling is disabled, then it will print text in the terminal's default color. I have applied the same fix to the guile API. I have extended the tests to cover this case. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-04-29[gdb] Handle nullptr gdb_std{err,out} in {gdbpy,ioscm}_flushTom de Vries1-3/+6
Using the trigger patch described in the previous commit, I get: ... $ gdb (gdb) <q>error detected on stdin Fatal signal: Segmentation fault ----- Backtrace ----- 0x64c7b3 gdb_internal_backtrace_1 /data/vries/gdb/src/gdb/bt-utils.c:127 0x64c937 _Z22gdb_internal_backtracev /data/vries/gdb/src/gdb/bt-utils.c:196 0x94db83 handle_fatal_signal /data/vries/gdb/src/gdb/event-top.c:1021 0x94dd48 handle_sigsegv /data/vries/gdb/src/gdb/event-top.c:1098 0x7f372be578ff ??? 0x10b7c0a _Z9gdb_flushP7ui_file /data/vries/gdb/src/gdb/utils.c:1527 0xd4b938 gdbpy_flush /data/vries/gdb/src/gdb/python/python.c:1624 0x7f372d73b276 _PyCFunction_FastCallDict Objects/methodobject.c:231 0x7f372d73b276 _PyCFunction_FastCallKeywords Objects/methodobject.c:294 0x7f372d794a09 call_function Python/ceval.c:4851 0x7f372d78e838 _PyEval_EvalFrameDefault Python/ceval.c:3351 0x7f372d796e6e PyEval_EvalFrameEx Python/ceval.c:754 0x7f372d796e6e _PyFunction_FastCall Python/ceval.c:4933 0x7f372d796e6e _PyFunction_FastCallDict Python/ceval.c:5035 0x7f372d6fefc8 _PyObject_FastCallDict Objects/abstract.c:2310 0x7f372d6fefc8 _PyObject_Call_Prepend Objects/abstract.c:2373 0x7f372d6fe162 _PyObject_FastCallDict Objects/abstract.c:2331 0x7f372d700705 callmethod Objects/abstract.c:2583 0x7f372d700705 _PyObject_CallMethodId Objects/abstract.c:2640 0x7f372d812a41 flush_std_files Python/pylifecycle.c:699 0x7f372d81281d Py_FinalizeEx Python/pylifecycle.c:768 0xd4d49b finalize_python /data/vries/gdb/src/gdb/python/python.c:2308 0x9587eb _Z17ext_lang_shutdownv /data/vries/gdb/src/gdb/extension.c:330 0xfd98df _Z10quit_forcePii /data/vries/gdb/src/gdb/top.c:1817 0x6b3080 _Z12quit_commandPKci /data/vries/gdb/src/gdb/cli/cli-cmds.c:483 0x1056577 stdin_event_handler /data/vries/gdb/src/gdb/ui.c:131 0x1986970 handle_file_event /data/vries/gdb/src/gdbsupport/event-loop.cc:551 0x1986f4b gdb_wait_for_event /data/vries/gdb/src/gdbsupport/event-loop.cc:672 0x1985e0c _Z16gdb_do_one_eventi /data/vries/gdb/src/gdbsupport/event-loop.cc:263 0xb66f2e start_event_loop /data/vries/gdb/src/gdb/main.c:402 0xb670ba captured_command_loop /data/vries/gdb/src/gdb/main.c:466 0xb68b9b captured_main /data/vries/gdb/src/gdb/main.c:1344 0xb68c44 _Z8gdb_mainP18captured_main_args /data/vries/gdb/src/gdb/main.c:1363 0x41a3b1 main /data/vries/gdb/src/gdb/gdb.c:38 --------------------- A fatal error internal to GDB has been detected, further debugging is not possible. GDB will now terminate. This is a bug, please report it. For instructions, see: <https://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/>. Segmentation fault (core dumped) $ q ... Fix this in gdbpy_flush by checking for nullptr gdb_stdout/gdb_stderr (and likewise in ioscm_flush) such that we get instead: ... $ gdb (gdb) <q>error detected on stdin $ q ... Tested on x86_64-linux. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2025-04-24gdb: fix some flake8 F824 warningsSimon Marchi11-33/+2
flake8 7.2.0 appears to have this new warning: F824: global name / nonlocal name is unused: name is never assigned in scope It points out a few places in our code base where "global" is not necessary, fix them. Change-Id: Ia6fb08686977559726fefe2a5bb95d8dcb298bb0 Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-04-24gdb/python: keyword arguments for gdb.Color.escape_sequenceAndrew Burgess1-14/+15
GDB's Python documentation does make it clear that keywords arguments are supported for functions that take 2 or more arguments. The documentation makes no promise for keyword argument support on functions that only take a single argument. That said, I'm a fan of keyword arguments, I think they help document the code, and make intentions clearer, even for single argument functions. As I'm changing gdb.Color anyway (see previous commit), I'd like to add keyword argument support to gdb.Color.escape_sequence, even though this is a single argument method. This should be harmless for anyone who doesn't want to use keywords, but adds the option for those of us that do. I've also removed a redundant check that the 'self' argument was a gdb.Color object; Python already ensures this is the case. And I have folded the check that the single argument is a bool into the gdb_PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords call, this means that the error message will include the incorrect type name now, which should make debugging issues easier. Tests have been extended to cover both cases -- it appears the incorrect argument type error was not previously tested, so it is now. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-04-24gdb/python: keyword args for Color.__init__Andrew Burgess1-1/+4
GDB's Python API documentation is clear: Functions and methods which have two or more optional arguments allow them to be specified using keyword syntax. The gdb.Color.__init__ method matches this description, but doesn't support keyword arguments. This commit fixes this by adding keyword argument support. There's a new test to cover this functionality. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-04-23gdb/python: don't use PyObject_IsInstance in py-unwind.cAndrew Burgess1-3/+3
I've been reviewing all uses of PyObject_IsInstance, and I believe that the use of PyObject_IsInstance in py-unwind.c is not entirely correct. The use of PyObject_IsInstance is in this code in frame_unwind_python::sniff: if (PyObject_IsInstance (pyo_unwind_info, (PyObject *) &unwind_info_object_type) <= 0) error (_("A Unwinder should return gdb.UnwindInfo instance.")); The problem is that PyObject_IsInstance can return -1 to indicate an error, in which case a Python error will have been set. Now, the above code appears to handle this case, it checks for '<= 0', however, frame_unwind_python::sniff has this near the start: gdbpy_enter enter_py (gdbarch); And looking in python.c at 'gdbpy_enter::~gdbpy_enter ()', you'll notice that if an error is set then the error is printed, but also, we get a warning about an unhandled Python exception. Clearly, all exceptions should have been handled by the time the gdbpy_enter destructor is called. I've added a test as part of this commit that exposes this problem, the current output is: (gdb) backtrace Python Exception <class 'RuntimeError'>: error in Blah.__class__ warning: internal error: Unhandled Python exception Python Exception <class 'gdb.error'>: A Unwinder should return gdb.UnwindInfo instance. #0 corrupt_frame_inner () at /home/andrew/projects/binutils-gdb/build.dev-g/gdb/testsuite/../../../src.dev-g/gdb/test> (gdb) An additional observation is that we use PyObject_IsInstance to check that the return value is a gdb.UnwindInfo, or a sub-class. However, gdb.UnwindInfo lacks the Py_TPFLAGS_BASETYPE flag, and so cannot be sub-classed. As such, PyObject_IsInstance is not really needed, we could use PyObject_TypeCheck instead. The PyObject_TypeCheck function only returns 0 or 1, there is no -1 error case. Switching to PyObject_TypeCheck then, fixes the above problem. There's a new test that exposes the problems that originally existed. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-04-23gdb/python: don't use PyObject_IsInstance in py-registers.cAndrew Burgess1-2/+1
In python/py-registers.c we make use of PyObject_IsInstance. The PyObject_IsInstance can return -1 for an error, 0 for false, or 1 for true. In py-registers.c we treat the return value from PyObject_IsInstance as a boolean, which means both -1 and 1 will be treated as true. If PyObject_IsInstance returns -1 for an error, this will be treated as true, we will then invoke undefined behaviour as the pyo_reg_id object will be treated as a gdb.RegisterDescriptor, even though it might not be. I noticed that the gdb.RegisterDescriptor class does not have the Py_TPFLAGS_BASETYPE flag, and therefore cannot be inherited from. As such, using PyObject_IsInstance is not necessary, we can use PyObject_TypeCheck instead. The PyObject_TypeCheck function only returns 0 or 1, so we don't need to worry about the error case. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-04-23gdb/python: don't use PyObject_IsInstance in gdbpy_is_colorAndrew Burgess1-1/+2
The gdbpy_is_color function uses PyObject_IsInstance, and converts the return from PyObject_IsInstance to a bool. Unfortunately, PyObject_IsInstance can return -1, 0, or 1, for error, failure, or success respectively. When converting to a bool both -1 and 1 will convert to true. Additionally, when PyObject_IsInstance returns -1 an error will be set. What this means is that, if gdbpy_is_color is called with a non gdb.Color object, and the PyObject_IsInstance check raises an error, then (a) GDB will continue as if the object is a gdb.Color object, which is likely going to invoke undefined behaviour, see gdbpy_get_color for example, and (b) when GDB eventually returns to the Python interpreter, due to an error being set, we'll see: Python Exception <class 'SystemError'>: PyEval_EvalFrameEx returned a result with an error set Error occurred in Python: PyEval_EvalFrameEx returned a result with an error set However, after the previous commit, gdb.Color can no longer be sub-classed, this means that fixing the above problems is easy, we can replace the PyObject_IsInstance check with a PyObject_TypeCheck, the PyObject_TypeCheck function only returns 0 or 1, there's no -1 error case. It's also worth noting that PyObject_TypeCheck is the function that is more commonly used within GDB's Python API implementation, include the py-color.c use there were only 4 PyObject_IsInstance uses. Of the remaining 3, 2 are fine, and one other (in py-disasm.c) is also wrong. I'll address that in a separate patch. There's also a new test included which exposes the above issue. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-04-23gdb/python: remove Py_TPFLAGS_BASETYPE from gdb.ColorAndrew Burgess1-1/+1
Remove the Py_TPFLAGS_BASETYPE flag from the gdb.Color type. This effectively makes gdb.Color final; users can no longer create classes that inherit from gdb.Color. Right now I cannot think of any cases where inheritance would be needed over composition for a simple type like gdb.Color. If I'm wrong, then it's easy to add Py_TPFLAGS_BASETYPE back in later, this would be an extension of the API. But it's much harder to remove the flag later as that might break existing user code (note: there has been no release of GDB yet that includes the gdb.Color type). Introducing this restriction makes the next commit easier. Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-04-23gdb/python: stop using PyObject_IsInstance in py-disasm.cAndrew Burgess1-5/+6
The PyObject_IsInstance function can return -1 for errors, 0 to indicate false, and 1 to indicate true. I noticed in python/py-disasm.c that we treat the result of PyObject_IsInstance as a bool. This means that if PyObject_IsInstance returns -1, then this will be treated as true. The consequence of this is that we will invoke undefined behaviour by treating the result from the _print_insn call as if it was a DisassemblerResult object, even though PyObject_IsInstance raised an error, and the result might not be of the required type. I could fix this by taking the -1 result into account, however, gdb.DisassemblerResult cannot be sub-classed, the type doesn't have the Py_TPFLAGS_BASETYPE flag. As such, we can switch to using PyObject_TypeCheck instead, which only return 0 or 1, with no error case. I have also taken the opportunity to improve the error message emitted if the result has the wrong type. Better error message make debugging issues easier. I've added a test which exposes the problem when using PyObject_IsInstance, and I've updated the existing test for the improved error message. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-04-22gdb/python: address some coding style issues in py-color.cAndrew Burgess1-17/+17
A few minor GNU/GDB coding style issues in py-color.c: - Space after '&' reference operator in one place. - Some excessive indentation on a couple of lines. - Spaces after '!' logical negation operator. - Using a pointer as a bool in a couple of places. There should be no functional changes after this commit.
2025-04-22gdb/python: remove stray white space in error messageAndrew Burgess1-1/+1
Spotted a stray white space at the end of an error message. Removed, and updated the py-breakpoint.exp test to check this case.
2025-04-22gdb/python: fix memory leak of gdb.Color objectsAndrew Burgess1-1/+0
I noticed that this commit: commit 6447969d0ac774b6dec0f95a0d3d27c27d158690 Date: Sat Oct 5 22:27:44 2024 +0300 Add an option with a color type. has an unnecessary `Py_INCREF (self);` in gdb.Color.__init__. This means that the reference count on all gdb.Color objects (that pass through __init__) will be +1 from where they should normally be, and this will stop the gdb.Color objects from being deallocated. Fix by removing the Py_INCREF call. Add a test which exposes the memory leak. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-04-17Clean up value_struct_elt_bitposTom Tromey1-2/+1
value_struct_elt_bitpos is weird: it takes an in/out value parameter, and it takes an error string parameter. However, it only has a single caller, which never uses the "out" value. I think it was done this way to mimic value_struct_elt. However, value_struct_elt is pretty ugly and I don't think it's worth imitating. This patch cleans up value_struct_elt_bitpos a bit. Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
2025-04-08Update copyright dates to include 2025Tom Tromey114-114/+114
This updates the copyright headers to include 2025. I did this by running gdb/copyright.py and then manually modifying a few files as noted by the script. Approved-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
2025-04-07[gdb/cli] Use debug info language to pick pygments lexerTom de Vries2-5/+19
Consider the following scenario: ... $ cat hello int main (void) { printf ("hello\n"); return 0; } $ gcc -x c hello -g $ gdb -q -iex "maint set gnu-source-highlight enabled off" a.out Reading symbols from a.out... (gdb) start Temporary breakpoint 1 at 0x4005db: file hello, line 6. Starting program: /data/vries/gdb/a.out [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1". Temporary breakpoint 1, main () at hello:6 6 printf ("hello\n"); ... This doesn't produce highlighting for line 6, because: - pygments is used for highlighting instead of source-highlight, and - pygments guesses the language for highlighting only based on the filename, which in this case doesn't give a clue. Fix this by: - adding a language parameter to the extension_language_ops.colorize interface, - passing the language as found in the debug info, and - using it in gdb.styling.colorize to pick the pygments lexer. The new test-case gdb.python/py-source-styling-2.exp excercises a slightly different scenario: it compiles a c++ file with a .c extension, and checks that c++ highlighting is done instead of c highlighting. Tested on x86_64-linux. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> PR cli/30966 Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30966
2025-04-03Make gdb/python codespell-cleanTom Tromey1-1/+1
This cleans up the last codespell report in the Python directory and adds gdb/python to pre-commit. Approved-By: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
2025-03-27gdb/dap - Add CompletionsRequestoltolm3-2/+80
Use GDB/MI command "-complete" to implement. Co-authored-by: Simon Farre <simon.farre.cx@gmail.com> Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31140 Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
2025-03-20[gdb/build] Fix build with gcc 9Tom de Vries1-1/+1
Since commit a691853148f ("gdb/python: introduce gdbpy_registry"), when building gdb with gcc 9, I run into: ... In file included from gdb/varobj.c:38:0: gdb/python/python-internal.h:1211:47: error: expected ‘;’ before ‘<’ token using StorageKey = typename registry<O>::key<Storage>; ^ ... due to this code: ... template <typename Storage> class gdbpy_registry { ... template<typename O> using StorageKey = typename registry<O>::key<Storage>; template<typename O> Storage *get_storage (O *owner, const StorageKey<O> &key) const { ... } ... } ... As an experiment, I tried out eliminating the type alias: ... template<typename O> Storage *get_storage (O *owner, const typename registry<O>::key<Storage> &key) const { ... } ... and got instead: ... In file included from gdb/varobj.c:38:0: gdb/python/python-internal.h:1211:63: error: non-template ‘key’ used as template Storage *get_storage (O *owner, const typename registry<O>::key<Storage> &key) const ^~~ gdb/python/python-internal.h:1211:63: note: use ‘registry<O>::template key’ \ to indicate that it is a template ... Following that suggestion, I tried: ... template<typename O> Storage * get_storage (O *owner, const typename registry<O>::template key<Storage> &key) const { ... } ... which fixed the problem. Likewise, adding the template keyword in the type alias fixes the original problem, so fix it like that. Tested on x86_64-linux.
2025-03-19gdb/python: convert gdb.Symtab_and_line to use gdbpy_registryJan Vrany1-36/+11
This commit converts gdb.Symtab_and_line to use gdbpy_registry for lifecycle management. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-03-19gdb/python: convert gdb.Symtab to use gdbpy_registryJan Vrany1-59/+14
This commit converts gdb.Symtab to use gdbpy_registry for lifecycle management. Since gdb.Symtab only holds on the struct symtab * (and prev/next links) the default invalidator can be used. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-03-19gdb/python: convert gdb.Type to use gdbpy_registryJan Vrany1-92/+21
This commit converts gdb.Type to use gdbpy_registry for lifecycle management. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-03-19gdb/python: convert gdb.Symbol to use gdbpy_registryJan Vrany1-67/+12
This commit converts gdb.Symbol to use gdbpy_registry for lifecycle management. Since gdb.Symbol only holds on the struct symbol * (and prev/next links) the default invalidator can be used. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-03-19gdb/python: introduce gdbpy_registryJan Vrany1-0/+195
This commit introduces new template class gdbpy_registry to simplify Python object lifecycle management. As of now, each of the Python object implementations contain its own (copy of) lifecycle management code that is largely very similar. The aim of gdbpy_registry is to factor out this code into a common (template) class in order to simplify the code. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-03-19gdb/python: do not hold on gdb.Type object from gdb.ValueJan Vrany1-33/+7
Previous commit changed type_to_type_object() so each time it is called with particular struct value* it returns the same object. Therefore there's no longer need to hold on type objects (gdb.Type) from struct value_object in order to preserve identity of gdb.Type objects held in value_object::type and value_object::dynamic_type members. This in turn allowed for some simplification in various functions. While at it I changed a couple of NULLs to nullptrs. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-03-19gdb/python: preserve identity for gdb.Type objectsJan Vrany1-15/+76
This commit changes type_to_type_object() so that each it is called with a particular struct type * it returns the very same gdb.Type object. This is done in the same way as for gdb.Symtab objects in earlier commit ("gdb/python: preserve identity for gdb.Symtab objects") except that types may be either objfile-owned or arch-owned. Prior this commit, arch-owned objects we not put into any list (like objfile-owned ones) so they could not be easily looked up. This commit changes the code so arch-owned list are put into per-architecture list which is then used (solely) for looking up arch-owned gdb.Type. Another complication comes from the fact that when objfile is about to be freed, associated gdb.Type instances are not merely invalidated (like it is done with gdb.Symtab or gdb.Symbol objects) but instead the type is copied and the copy is arch-owned. So we need two different "deleters", one for objfile-owned types that copies the type (as before) and then insert the object to per-architecture list and another one for arch-owned types. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-03-19gdb/python: do not hold on gdb.Symtab object from gdb.Symtab_and_lineJan Vrany2-53/+22
Previous commit changed symtab_to_symtab_object() so each time it is called with particula struct symtab* it returns the same object. Therefore there's no longer need to hold on symtab object (gdb.Symtab) from struct sal_object in order to preserve identity of Symtab object held in gdb.Symtab_and_line.symtab property. This in turn allowed for some simplification in various functions. While at it I changed a couple of NULLs to nullptrs. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-03-19gdb/python: preserve identity for gdb.Symbol objectsJan Vrany1-12/+50
This commit changes symbol_to_symbol_object() so that each it is called with a particular struct symbol * it returns the very same gdb.Symbol object. This is done in the same way as for gdb.Symtab objects in earlier commit ("gdb/python: preserve identity for gdb.Symtab objects") except that symbols may be either objfile-owned or arch-owned. Prior this commit, arch-owned objects we not put into any list (like objfile-owned ones) so they could not be easily looked up. This commit changes the code so arch-owned list are put into per-architecture list which is then used (solely) for looking up arch-owned gdb.Symbol. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-03-19gdb/python: preserve identity for gdb.Symtab objectsJan Vrany1-1/+17
This commit changes symtab_to_symtab_object() so that each it is called with a particular struct symtab * it returns the very same gdb.Symtab object. This is done by searching per-objfile linked list of instances and - if found - return it rather than creating new gdb.Symtab. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-03-19gdb/python: new styling argument to gdb.executeAndrew Burgess1-6/+33
Currently, gdb.execute emits styled output when the command is sending its output to GDB's stdout, and produces unstyled output when the output is going to a string. But it is not unreasonable that a user might wish to capture styled output from a gdb.execute call, for example, the user might want to display the styled output are part of some larger UI output block. At the same time, I don't think it makes sense to always produce styled output when capturing the output in a string; if what the user wants is to parse the output, then the style escape sequences make this far harder. I propose that gdb.execute gain a new argument 'styling'. When False we would always produce unstyled output, and when True we would produce styled output if styling is not disabled by some other means. For example, if GDB's 'set style enabled' is off, then I think gdb.execute() should respect that. My assumption here is that gdb.execute() might be executed by some extension. If the extension thinks "styled output world work here", but the user hates styled output, and has turned it off, then the extension should not be forcing styled output on the user. I chose 'styling' instead of 'styled' as the Python argument name because we already use 'styling' in gdb.Value.format_string, and we don't use 'styled' anywhere else. This is only a little bit of consistency, but I still think it's a good thing. The default for 'styling' will change depending on where the output is going. When gdb.execute is sending the output to GDB's stdout then the default for 'styling' is True. When the output is going to a string, then the default for 'styling' will be False. Not only does this match the existing behaviour, but I think this makes sense. By default we assume that output captured in a string is going to be parsed, and therefore styling markup is unhelpful, while output going to stdout should receive styling. This fixes part of the problem described in PR gdb/32676. That bug tries to capture styled source listing in a string, which wasn't previously possible. There are some additional issues with capturing source code; GDB caches the source code in the source code cache. However, GDB doesn't check if the cached content is styled or not. As a consequence, if the first time the source of a file is shown it is unstyled, then the cached will hold the unstyled source code, and future requests will return that unstyled source. I'll address this issue in a separate patch. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32676 Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2025-03-18gdb: split up construct_inferior_argumentsAndrew Burgess1-1/+1
The function construct_inferior_arguments (gdbsupport/common-inferior.cc) currently escapes all special shell characters. After this commit there will be two "levels" of quoting: 1. The current "full" quoting, where all posix shell special characters are quoted, and 2. a new "reduced" quoting, where only the characters that GDB sees as special (quotes and whitespace) are quoted. After this, almost all construct_inferior_arguments calls will use the "full" quoting, which is the current quoting. The "reduced" quoting will be used in this commit to restore the behaviour that was lost in the previous commit (more details below). In the future, the reduced quoting will be useful for some additional inferior argument that I have planned. I already posted my full inferior argument work here: https://inbox.sourceware.org/gdb-patches/cover.1730731085.git.aburgess@redhat.com But that series is pretty long, and wasn't getting reviewed, so I'm posted the series in parts now. Before the previous commit, GDB behaved like this: $ gdb -eiex 'set startup-with-shell off' --args /tmp/exec '$FOO' (gdb) show args Argument list to give program being debugged when it is started is "$FOO". Notice that with 'startup-with-shell' off, the argument was left as just '$FOO'. But after the previous commit, this changed to: $ gdb -eiex 'set startup-with-shell off' --args /tmp/exec '$FOO' (gdb) show args Argument list to give program being debugged when it is started is "\$FOO". Now the '$' is escaped with a backslash. This commit restores the original behaviour, as this is (currently) the only way to unquoted shell special characters into arguments from the GDB command line. The series that I listed above includes a new command line option for GDB which provides a better approach for controlling the quoting of special shell characters, but that work requires these patches to be merged first. I've split out the core of construct_inferior_arguments into the new function escape_characters, which takes a set of characters to escape. Then the two functions escape_shell_characters and escape_gdb_characters call escape_characters with the appropriate character sets. Finally, construct_inferior_arguments, now takes a boolean which indicates if we should perform full shell escaping, or just perform the reduced escaping. I've updated all uses of construct_inferior_arguments to pass a suitable value to indicate what escaping to perform (mostly just 'true', but one case in main.c is different), also I've updated inferior::set_args to take the same boolean flag, and pass it through to construct_inferior_arguments. Tested-By: Guinevere Larsen <guinevere@redhat.com>