ld: Correct test pr19719 naming mix-up

The suffix "defined/undefined" in the ld test pr19719 name specifies
whether weak fun() is defined or undefined is mixed up.

The test builds an executable and a shared library. The latter in two
flavors, one with weak fun() defined (libpr19719a.so, "defined") and
one without weak fun() defined (libpr19719b.so, "undefined").

The first "Run $exe fun [...]" invocation uses libpr19719b.so as
libpr19719.so, which is build from dummy.c, which does not define fun.
Thus fun is undefined during this test run.

The second "Run $exe fun [...]" invocation uses libpr19719a.so as
libpr19719.so, which is build from pr19719d.c, which does define fun.
Thus fun is defined during this test run.

Correct the test naming mix-up accordingly.

ld/testsuite/
	* ld-elf/shared.exp (mix_pic_and_non_pic): Correct test naming
	mix-up of when weak fun is un-/defined.

Signed-off-by: Jens Remus <jremus@linux.ibm.com>

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions