Mark move constructors as "noexcept"

I recently learned that move constructors generally should be marked
"noexcept".  This ensures that standard containers will move objects
when possible, rather than copy them.

This patch fixes the cases I could find.  Note that implicitly-defined
or defaulted move constructors will automatically do what you'd
expect; that is, they are noexcept if all the members have noexcept
move constructors.

While doing this, I noticed a couple of odd cases where the move
constructor seemed to assume that the object being constructed could
have state requiring destruction.  I've fixed these as well.  See
completion_result and scoped_mmap.

gdb/ChangeLog
2020-04-20  Tom Tromey  <tromey@adacore.com>

	* python/python.c (struct gdbpy_event): Mark move constructor as
	noexcept.
	* python/py-tui.c (class gdbpy_tui_window_maker): Mark move
	constructor as noexcept.
	* completer.h (struct completion_result): Mark move constructor as
	noexcept.
	* completer.c (completion_result::completion_result): Use
	initialization style.  Don't call reset_match_list.

gdbsupport/ChangeLog
2020-04-20  Tom Tromey  <tromey@adacore.com>

	* scoped_mmap.h (scoped_mmap): Mark move constructor as noexcept.
	Use initialization style.  Don't call destroy.
	* scoped_fd.h (class scoped_fd): Mark move constructor as
	noexcept.
	* gdb_ref_ptr.h (class ref_ptr): Mark move constructor as
	noexcept.

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/gdbsupport/scoped_fd.h b/gdbsupport/scoped_fd.h
index f40ce8b..ec654df 100644
--- a/gdbsupport/scoped_fd.h
+++ b/gdbsupport/scoped_fd.h
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ class scoped_fd
 public:
   explicit scoped_fd (int fd = -1) noexcept : m_fd (fd) {}
 
-  scoped_fd (scoped_fd &&other)
+  scoped_fd (scoped_fd &&other) noexcept
     : m_fd (other.m_fd)
   {
     other.m_fd = -1;