diff options
| author | Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com> | 2022-11-03 10:01:42 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com> | 2022-11-04 12:02:32 +0100 |
| commit | 476410b3bca1389ee69e9c8fa18aaee16793a56d (patch) | |
| tree | 63af83449147525cc248cf93c63445c924c96ed6 /gdb | |
| parent | d8521074fe20928d34072701043806f381c5a07d (diff) | |
| download | binutils-476410b3bca1389ee69e9c8fa18aaee16793a56d.zip binutils-476410b3bca1389ee69e9c8fa18aaee16793a56d.tar.gz binutils-476410b3bca1389ee69e9c8fa18aaee16793a56d.tar.bz2 | |
gdb/testsuite: add KFAILs to gdb.reverse/step-reverse.exp
Recent changes to gdb.reverse/step-reverse.exp revealed the latent bug
PR record/29745, where we can't skip one funcion forward if we're using
native-gdbserver. This commit just adds kfails to the test.
Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29745
Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb')
| -rw-r--r-- | gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/step-reverse.exp | 15 |
1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/step-reverse.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/step-reverse.exp index c28e1f6..d2975cf 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/step-reverse.exp +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/step-reverse.exp @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ if { [prepare_for_testing "failed to prepare" $testfile $srcfile] } { } runto_main +set target_remote [gdb_is_target_remote] if [supports_process_record] { # Activate process record/replay @@ -273,11 +274,25 @@ if { "$step_out" == 1 } { # Step forward over recursion again so we can test stepping over calls # inside the recursion itself. gdb_test_no_output "set exec-dir forward" "forward again to test recursion" +if {$target_remote} { + # gdb doesn't record the change of return pointer for remote targets, + # so we can't next forward over functions. + setup_kfail gdb/29745 *-*-* +} gdb_test "next" "NEXT OVER THIS CALL.*" "reverse next over recursion again" gdb_test_no_output "set exec-dir reverse" "reverse again to test recursion" +if {$target_remote} { + # Because of the above mentioned KFAIL, the inferior is now out of sync + setup_kfail gdb/29745 *-*-* +} gdb_test "step" ".*EXIT RECURSIVE FUNCTION.*" "enter recursive function" set seen_recursive_call 0 +if {$target_remote} { + # Because of the above mentioned KFAIL, the inferior is now out of sync + # The fail state below will resync the inferior. + setup_kfail gdb/29745 *-*-* +} gdb_test_multiple "next" "step over recursion inside the recursion" { -re -wrap ".*RECURSIVE CALL.*" { incr seen_recursive_call |