aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb/python
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>2022-01-27 15:12:25 +0000
committerAndrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>2022-02-02 16:27:36 +0000
commita591084285cc16a435258641691aa0a8f5bf42ee (patch)
treeb096fa3b9073303942ef7c20070bef1092648ae5 /gdb/python
parent82d0a72cdc9ca6cd37a8987e2bcd2eb707c51149 (diff)
downloadbinutils-a591084285cc16a435258641691aa0a8f5bf42ee.zip
binutils-a591084285cc16a435258641691aa0a8f5bf42ee.tar.gz
binutils-a591084285cc16a435258641691aa0a8f5bf42ee.tar.bz2
gdb: test to check one aspect of the linespec parsing code
While working on the fix for PR cli/28665 (see previous couple of commits), I was playing with making a change in the linespec parsing code. Specifically, I was thinking about whether the spec_string for LINESPEC_LOCATION locations should ever be nullptr. I made a change to prevent the spec_string from ever being nullptr, tested gdb, and saw no regressions. However, as part of this work I was reviewing how the breakpoint code handles this case (spec_string being nullptr), and spotted that in parse_breakpoint_sals the nullptr case is specifically handled, so changing this should have caused a regression. But I didn't see one. So, this commit adds a comment in location.c mentioning that the nullptr case is (a) not an oversight, and (b) is required. Then I add a new test to gdb.base/break.exp that ensures a change in this area will cause a regression. This test passes on current gdb, but with my modified (and broken) gdb, the test would fail.
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/python')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions