diff options
author | Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com> | 2023-05-17 09:50:12 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com> | 2023-05-19 10:15:01 +0100 |
commit | a500c3d8e0260a556d48c7d5ee2bc4212982dfe2 (patch) | |
tree | bb5a9cb73fba071d17115ffc4ea5c3a5ae9a0e27 /gdb/cli-out.c | |
parent | 637969a709c4542702d283a0471c5364d26ba81b (diff) | |
download | binutils-a500c3d8e0260a556d48c7d5ee2bc4212982dfe2.zip binutils-a500c3d8e0260a556d48c7d5ee2bc4212982dfe2.tar.gz binutils-a500c3d8e0260a556d48c7d5ee2bc4212982dfe2.tar.bz2 |
gdb/breakpoint: use warning function instead of gdb_printf
Noticed that in breakpoint.c, in one place, we do this:
gdb_printf (_("warning: Error removing "
"breakpoint %d\n"),
old_loc->owner->number);
Instead of using the `warning` function. There are a number of
differences between using gdb_printf like this and calling `warning`,
the main one is probably that real warnings are sent to gdb_stderr,
while the above gdb_printf call will go to gdb_stdout.
In this commit I:
1. Change to call `warning`, we can drop the "warning: " prefix from
the string in breakpoint.c,
2. Update the warning text, I now start with a lower case 'e', which
I believe is the GDB style for warnings,
3. And I have included the address of the bp_location in the warning
messsage,
4. Finally, I update all the tests (2) that include this error
message.
Reviewed-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/cli-out.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions