aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/llvm/test/Analysis/DependenceAnalysis/FlipFlopBaseAddress.ll
blob: bf2268b746a6fee31ccaa2fb815d952ce1173d47 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_analyze_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --version 5
; RUN: opt < %s -disable-output "-passes=print<da>" -aa-pipeline=basic-aa 2>&1 \
; RUN: | FileCheck %s

; Check that dependence analysis correctly handles flip-flop of base addresses.
; Bug 41488 - https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/41488

define float @bug41488_test1(float %f) {
; CHECK-LABEL: 'bug41488_test1'
; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load float, ptr %p, align 4 --> Dst: %0 = load float, ptr %p, align 4
; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load float, ptr %p, align 4 --> Dst: store float %f, ptr %q, align 4
; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store float %f, ptr %q, align 4 --> Dst: store float %f, ptr %q, align 4
; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
;
entry:
  %g = alloca float, align 4
  %h = alloca float, align 4
  br label %for.body

for.body:
  %p = phi float* [ %g, %entry ], [ %q, %for.body ]
  %q = phi float* [ %h, %entry ], [ %p, %for.body ]
  %0 = load float, float* %p, align 4
  store float %f, float* %q, align 4
  %branch_cond = fcmp ugt float %0, 0.0
  br i1 %branch_cond, label %for.cond.cleanup, label %for.body

for.cond.cleanup:
  ret float %f
}

define void @bug41488_test2(i32 %n) {
; CHECK-LABEL: 'bug41488_test2'
; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load float, ptr %p, align 4 --> Dst: %0 = load float, ptr %p, align 4
; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load float, ptr %p, align 4 --> Dst: store float 0.000000e+00, ptr %q, align 4
; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store float 0.000000e+00, ptr %q, align 4 --> Dst: store float 0.000000e+00, ptr %q, align 4
; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
;
entry:
  %g = alloca float, align 4
  %h = alloca float, align 4
  br label %for.body

for.body:
  %i = phi i32 [0, %entry ], [ %inc, %for.body ]
  %p = phi float* [ %g, %entry ], [ %q, %for.body ]
  %q = phi float* [ %h, %entry ], [ %p, %for.body ]
  %0 = load float, float* %p, align 4
  store float 0.0, float* %q, align 4
  %inc = add nuw i32 %i, 1
  %branch_cond = icmp ult i32 %i, %n
  br i1 %branch_cond, label %for.body, label %for.cond.cleanup

for.cond.cleanup:
  ret void
}

; Bug 53942 - https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53942

define void @bug53942_foo(i32 noundef %n, ptr noalias nocapture noundef writeonly %A, ptr noalias nocapture noundef %B) {
; CHECK-LABEL: 'bug53942_foo'
; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %.pre = load double, ptr %B, align 8 --> Dst: %.pre = load double, ptr %B, align 8
; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - consistent input [S]!
; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %.pre = load double, ptr %B, align 8 --> Dst: store double %.pre, ptr %arrayidx2, align 8
; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store double %.pre, ptr %arrayidx2, align 8 --> Dst: store double %.pre, ptr %arrayidx2, align 8
; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
;
entry:
  %cmp8 = icmp sgt i32 %n, 1
  br i1 %cmp8, label %for.body.preheader, label %for.cond.cleanup

for.body.preheader:                               ; preds = %entry
  %wide.trip.count = zext nneg i32 %n to i64
  br label %for.body

for.cond.cleanup:                                 ; preds = %for.body, %entry
  ret void

for.body:                                         ; preds = %for.body.preheader, %for.body
  %indvars.iv = phi i64 [ 1, %for.body.preheader ], [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body ]
  %ptr1.011 = phi ptr [ %A, %for.body.preheader ], [ %ptr2.09, %for.body ]
  %ptr2.09 = phi ptr [ %B, %for.body.preheader ], [ %ptr1.011, %for.body ]
  %.pre = load double, ptr %B, align 8
  %arrayidx2 = getelementptr inbounds double, ptr %ptr1.011, i64 %indvars.iv
  store double %.pre, ptr %arrayidx2, align 8
  %indvars.iv.next = add nuw nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1
  %exitcond.not = icmp eq i64 %indvars.iv.next, %wide.trip.count
  br i1 %exitcond.not, label %for.cond.cleanup, label %for.body
}


; Bug 53942 - https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53942

define void @bug53942_bar(i32 noundef %n, ptr noalias noundef %A, ptr noalias noundef %B) {
; CHECK-LABEL: 'bug53942_bar'
; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load double, ptr %arrayidx, align 8 --> Dst: %0 = load double, ptr %arrayidx, align 8
; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: %0 = load double, ptr %arrayidx, align 8 --> Dst: store double %0, ptr %arrayidx8, align 8
; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store double %0, ptr %arrayidx8, align 8 --> Dst: store double %0, ptr %arrayidx8, align 8
; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
;
entry:
  br label %for.cond

for.cond:                                         ; preds = %for.inc, %entry
  %i.0 = phi i32 [ 1, %entry ], [ %inc, %for.inc ]
  %cmp = icmp slt i32 %i.0, %n
  br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.cond.cleanup

for.cond.cleanup:                                 ; preds = %for.cond
  br label %for.end

for.body:                                         ; preds = %for.cond
  %and = and i32 %i.0, 2
  %tobool.not = icmp eq i32 %and, 0
  br i1 %tobool.not, label %cond.false, label %cond.true

cond.true:                                        ; preds = %for.body
  br label %cond.end

cond.false:                                       ; preds = %for.body
  br label %cond.end

cond.end:                                         ; preds = %cond.false, %cond.true
  %cond = phi ptr [ %A, %cond.true ], [ %B, %cond.false ]
  %and1 = and i32 %i.0, 2
  %tobool2.not = icmp eq i32 %and1, 0
  br i1 %tobool2.not, label %cond.false4, label %cond.true3

cond.true3:                                       ; preds = %cond.end
  br label %cond.end5

cond.false4:                                      ; preds = %cond.end
  br label %cond.end5

cond.end5:                                        ; preds = %cond.false4, %cond.true3
  %cond6 = phi ptr [ %B, %cond.true3 ], [ %A, %cond.false4 ]
  %sub = add nsw i32 %i.0, -1
  %idxprom = sext i32 %sub to i64
  %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds double, ptr %cond6, i64 %idxprom
  %0 = load double, ptr %arrayidx, align 8
  %idxprom7 = zext nneg i32 %i.0 to i64
  %arrayidx8 = getelementptr inbounds double, ptr %cond, i64 %idxprom7
  store double %0, ptr %arrayidx8, align 8
  br label %for.inc

for.inc:                                          ; preds = %cond.end5
  %inc = add nuw nsw i32 %i.0, 1
  br label %for.cond

for.end:                                          ; preds = %for.cond.cleanup
  ret void
}

; Pseudo-code for the following IR:
;
; void f(int A[][42]) {
;   for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++)
;     for (int j = 0; j < 41; j++)
;       (j % 2 == 0 ? A[i][j] : A[i][j+1]) = 1;
; }
;
; There are loop-carried dependencies between the store instruction. For
; example, the value of %ptr0 when (i, j) = (0, 1) is %A+8, which is the same
; as when (i, j) = (0, 2).

define void @non_invariant_baseptr_with_identical_obj(ptr %A) {
; CHECK-LABEL: 'non_invariant_baseptr_with_identical_obj'
; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 1, ptr %idx, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 1, ptr %idx, align 4
; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
;
entry:
  br label %loop.i.header

loop.i.header:
  %i = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %i.inc, %loop.i.latch ]
  %A1 = getelementptr i32, ptr %A, i32 1
  br label %loop.j

loop.j:
  %j = phi i32 [ 0, %loop.i.header ], [ %j.inc, %loop.j ]
  %ptr0 = phi ptr [ %A, %loop.i.header ], [ %ptr1, %loop.j ]
  %ptr1 = phi ptr [ %A1, %loop.i.header ], [ %ptr0, %loop.j ]
  %idx = getelementptr [42 x i32], ptr %ptr0, i32 %i, i32 %j
  store i32 1, ptr %idx
  %j.inc = add i32 %j, 1
  %cmp.j = icmp slt i32 %j.inc, 41
  br i1 %cmp.j, label %loop.j, label %loop.i.latch

loop.i.latch:
  %i.inc = add i32 %i, 1
  %cmp.i = icmp slt i32 %i.inc, 100
  br i1 %cmp.i, label %loop.i.header, label %exit

exit:
  ret void
}

; Pseudo-code for the following IR:
;
; void f(int A[][42][42]) {
;   for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++)
;     for (int j = 0; j < 41; j++) {
;       int *ptr0 = (j % 2 == 0 ? A[i][j] : A[i][j+1]);
;       for (int k = 0; k < 42; k++)
;         ptr0[k] = 1;
;     }
; }
;
; Similar to the above case, but ptr0 is loop-invariant with respsect to the
; k-loop.
;
; Same as the above case, there are loop-carried dependencies between the
; store.

define void @non_invariant_baseptr_with_identical_obj2(ptr %A) {
; CHECK-LABEL: 'non_invariant_baseptr_with_identical_obj2'
; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 1, ptr %idx, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 1, ptr %idx, align 4
; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
;
entry:
  br label %loop.i.header

loop.i.header:
  %i = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %i.inc, %loop.i.latch ]
  %A1 = getelementptr i32, ptr %A, i32 1
  br label %loop.j.header

loop.j.header:
  %j = phi i32 [ 0, %loop.i.header ], [ %j.inc, %loop.j.latch ]
  %ptr0 = phi ptr [ %A, %loop.i.header ], [ %ptr1, %loop.j.latch ]
  %ptr1 = phi ptr [ %A1, %loop.i.header ], [ %ptr0, %loop.j.latch ]
  br label %loop.k

loop.k:
  %k = phi i32 [ 0, %loop.j.header ], [ %k.inc, %loop.k ]
  %idx = getelementptr [42 x [42 x i32]], ptr %ptr0, i32 %i, i32 %k, i32 %j
  store i32 1, ptr %idx
  %k.inc = add i32 %k, 1
  %cmp.k = icmp slt i32 %k.inc, 42
  br i1 %cmp.k, label %loop.k, label %loop.j.latch

loop.j.latch:
  %j.inc = add i32 %j, 1
  %cmp.j = icmp slt i32 %j.inc, 41
  br i1 %cmp.j, label %loop.j.header, label %loop.i.latch

loop.i.latch:
  %i.inc = add i32 %i, 1
  %cmp.i = icmp slt i32 %i.inc, 100
  br i1 %cmp.i, label %loop.i.header, label %exit

exit:
  ret void
}

; Pseudo-code that is approximately semantically equivalent to the below IR:
;
; void f(int A[][32]) {
;   for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++)
;     for (int j = 0; j < 15; j++) {
;       int offset = (j % 2 == 0) ? 1 : 0;
;       A[i][2 * j + offset + 0] = 1;
;       A[i][2 * j + offset + 1] = 1;
;     }
; }
;
; There are loop-carried dependencies between the two stores. For example,
; A[0][2] is accessed from both the former one when (i, j) = (0, 1) and the
; latter one when (i, j) = (0, 0).
;
define void @non_invariant_baseptr_with_identical_obj3(ptr %A) {
; CHECK-LABEL: 'non_invariant_baseptr_with_identical_obj3'
; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 1, ptr %idx0, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 1, ptr %idx0, align 4
; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 1, ptr %idx0, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 1, ptr %idx1, align 4
; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
; CHECK-NEXT:  Src: store i32 1, ptr %idx1, align 4 --> Dst: store i32 1, ptr %idx1, align 4
; CHECK-NEXT:    da analyze - confused!
;
entry:
  br label %loop.i.header

loop.i.header:
  %i = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %i.inc, %loop.i.latch ]
  %A1 = getelementptr i32, ptr %A, i32 1
  br label %loop.j

loop.j:
  %j = phi i32 [ 0, %loop.i.header ], [ %j.inc, %loop.j ]
  %ptr0 = phi ptr [ %A1, %loop.i.header ], [ %ptr1, %loop.j ]
  %ptr1 = phi ptr [ %A, %loop.i.header ], [ %ptr0, %loop.j ]
  %j2_0 = shl i32 %j, 1
  %j2_1 = add i32 %j2_0, 1
  %idx0 = getelementptr [32 x i32], ptr %ptr0, i32 %i, i32 %j2_0
  %idx1 = getelementptr [32 x i32], ptr %ptr0, i32 %i, i32 %j2_1
  store i32 1, ptr %idx0
  store i32 1, ptr %idx1
  %j.inc = add i32 %j, 1
  %cmp.j = icmp slt i32 %j.inc, 15
  br i1 %cmp.j, label %loop.j, label %loop.i.latch

loop.i.latch:
  %i.inc = add i32 %i, 1
  %cmp.i = icmp slt i32 %i.inc, 100
  br i1 %cmp.i, label %loop.i.header, label %exit

exit:
  ret void
}