[lldb] Also include the array definition in CommandOptions.inc

Summary:
Right now our CommandOptions.inc only generates the initializer for the options list but
not the array declaration boilerplate around it. As the array definition is identical for all arrays,
we might as well also let the CommandOptions.inc generate it alongside the initializers.

This patch will also allow us to generate additional declarations related to that option list in
the future (e.g. a enum class representing the specific options which would make our
handling code less prone).

This patch also fixes a few option tables that didn't follow our naming style.

Reviewers: JDevlieghere

Reviewed By: JDevlieghere

Subscribers: abidh, lldb-commits

Tags: #lldb

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65331

llvm-svn: 367186

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/lldb/source/Commands/CommandObjectWatchpointCommand.cpp b/lldb/source/Commands/CommandObjectWatchpointCommand.cpp
index 2be0b5b..52cd73b 100644
--- a/lldb/source/Commands/CommandObjectWatchpointCommand.cpp
+++ b/lldb/source/Commands/CommandObjectWatchpointCommand.cpp
@@ -42,10 +42,8 @@ static constexpr OptionEnumValues ScriptOptionEnum() {
   return OptionEnumValues(g_script_option_enumeration);
 }
 
-static constexpr OptionDefinition g_watchpoint_command_add_options[] = {
 #define LLDB_OPTIONS_watchpoint_command_add
 #include "CommandOptions.inc"
-};
 
 class CommandObjectWatchpointCommandAdd : public CommandObjectParsed,
                                           public IOHandlerDelegateMultiline {