[TableGen] Permit dag operators to be unset.

This is not a new semantic feature. The syntax `(? 1, 2, 3)` was
disallowed by the parser in a dag //expression//, but there were
already ways to sneak a `?` into the operator field of a dag
//value//, e.g. by initializing it from a class template parameter
which is then set to `?` by the instantiating `def`.

This patch makes `?` in the operator slot syntactically legal, so it's
now easy to construct dags with an unset operator. Also, the semantics
of `!con` are relaxed so that it will allow a combination of set and
unset operator fields in the dag nodes it's concatenating, with the
restriction that all the operators that are //not// unset still have
to agree with each other.

Reviewers: hfinkel, nhaehnle

Reviewed By: hfinkel, nhaehnle

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71195

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions