Format OptionEnumValueElement (NFC)

Reformat OptionEnumValueElement to make it easier to distinguish between
its fields. This also removes the need to disable clang-format for these
arrays.

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65489

llvm-svn: 367638

1 files changed, 20 insertions, 13 deletions

diff --git a/lldb/source/Commands/CommandObjectBreakpointCommand.cpp b/lldb/source/Commands/CommandObjectBreakpointCommand.cpp
index 68039ed..cba0392 100644
--- a/lldb/source/Commands/CommandObjectBreakpointCommand.cpp
+++ b/lldb/source/Commands/CommandObjectBreakpointCommand.cpp
@@ -26,19 +26,26 @@
 using namespace lldb;
 using namespace lldb_private;
 
-// CommandObjectBreakpointCommandAdd
-
 // FIXME: "script-type" needs to have its contents determined dynamically, so
-// somebody can add a new scripting
-// language to lldb and have it pickable here without having to change this
-// enumeration by hand and rebuild lldb proper.
-
+// somebody can add a new scripting language to lldb and have it pickable here
+// without having to change this enumeration by hand and rebuild lldb proper.
 static constexpr OptionEnumValueElement g_script_option_enumeration[] = {
-    {eScriptLanguageNone, "command",
-     "Commands are in the lldb command interpreter language"},
-    {eScriptLanguagePython, "python", "Commands are in the Python language."},
-    {eSortOrderByName, "default-script",
-     "Commands are in the default scripting language."} };
+    {
+        eScriptLanguageNone,
+        "command",
+        "Commands are in the lldb command interpreter language",
+    },
+    {
+        eScriptLanguagePython,
+        "python",
+        "Commands are in the Python language.",
+    },
+    {
+        eSortOrderByName,
+        "default-script",
+        "Commands are in the default scripting language.",
+    },
+};
 
 static constexpr OptionEnumValues ScriptOptionEnum() {
   return OptionEnumValues(g_script_option_enumeration);
@@ -558,7 +565,7 @@ protected:
 
     BreakpointIDList valid_bp_ids;
     CommandObjectMultiwordBreakpoint::VerifyBreakpointOrLocationIDs(
-        command, target, result, &valid_bp_ids, 
+        command, target, result, &valid_bp_ids,
         BreakpointName::Permissions::PermissionKinds::listPerm);
 
     if (result.Succeeded()) {
@@ -648,7 +655,7 @@ protected:
 
     BreakpointIDList valid_bp_ids;
     CommandObjectMultiwordBreakpoint::VerifyBreakpointOrLocationIDs(
-        command, target, result, &valid_bp_ids, 
+        command, target, result, &valid_bp_ids,
         BreakpointName::Permissions::PermissionKinds::listPerm);
 
     if (result.Succeeded()) {