diff options
author | Douglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com> | 2011-07-01 01:22:09 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Douglas Gregor <dgregor@apple.com> | 2011-07-01 01:22:09 +0000 |
commit | 678d76c02671e0584d81eee03702f54b2a02633a (patch) | |
tree | e24b7139f60bb9c95ed2bbb25c317032df148c4f /lldb/scripts/Python | |
parent | f2bcad972d5c0605199ecc8423a7d5120e48911a (diff) | |
download | llvm-678d76c02671e0584d81eee03702f54b2a02633a.zip llvm-678d76c02671e0584d81eee03702f54b2a02633a.tar.gz llvm-678d76c02671e0584d81eee03702f54b2a02633a.tar.bz2 |
Introduce the notion of instantiation dependence into Clang's AST. A
type/expression/template argument/etc. is instantiation-dependent if
it somehow involves a template parameter, even if it doesn't meet the
requirements for the more common kinds of dependence (dependent type,
type-dependent expression, value-dependent expression).
When we see an instantiation-dependent type, we know we always need to
perform substitution into that instantiation-dependent type. This
keeps us from short-circuiting evaluation in places where we
shouldn't, and lets us properly implement C++0x [temp.type]p2.
In theory, this would also allow us to properly mangle
instantiation-dependent-but-not-dependent decltype types per the
Itanium C++ ABI, but we aren't quite there because we still mangle
based on the canonical type in cases like, e.g.,
template<unsigned> struct A { };
template<typename T>
void f(A<sizeof(sizeof(decltype(T() + T())))>) { }
template void f<int>(A<sizeof(sizeof(int))>);
and therefore get the wrong answer.
llvm-svn: 134225
Diffstat (limited to 'lldb/scripts/Python')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions