aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/clang/lib/Serialization/ModuleFileExtension.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSam McCall <sam.mccall@gmail.com>2021-03-04 16:21:01 +0100
committerSam McCall <sam.mccall@gmail.com>2021-03-05 10:04:00 +0100
commita60d06d8b757b656726b70e83e76417297c7057b (patch)
treeb2196b415eca8dbbc45e061a619907a399a43a68 /clang/lib/Serialization/ModuleFileExtension.cpp
parent076698154ad7cd36c590379ed09fdd14047b8244 (diff)
downloadllvm-a60d06d8b757b656726b70e83e76417297c7057b.zip
llvm-a60d06d8b757b656726b70e83e76417297c7057b.tar.gz
llvm-a60d06d8b757b656726b70e83e76417297c7057b.tar.bz2
[clangd] Rename Module -> FeatureModule to avoid confusion. NFC
As pointed out in D96244, "Module" is already pretty overloaded to refer to clang and llvm modules. (And clangd deals directly with the former). FeatureModule is a bit of a mouthful but it's pretty self-descriptive. I think it might be better than "Component" which doesn't really capture the "common interface" aspect - it's IMO confusing to refer to "components" but exclude CDB for example. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97950
Diffstat (limited to 'clang/lib/Serialization/ModuleFileExtension.cpp')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions