[clang] Use StringRef::operator== instead of StringRef::equals (NFC) (#91844)

I'm planning to remove StringRef::equals in favor of
StringRef::operator==.

- StringRef::operator==/!= outnumber StringRef::equals by a factor of
  24 under clang/ in terms of their usage.

- The elimination of StringRef::equals brings StringRef closer to
  std::string_view, which has operator== but not equals.

- S == "foo" is more readable than S.equals("foo"), especially for
  !Long.Expression.equals("str") vs Long.Expression != "str".

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/clang/lib/Format/ContinuationIndenter.cpp b/clang/lib/Format/ContinuationIndenter.cpp
index ad0e2c3..6b9fbfe 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Format/ContinuationIndenter.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Format/ContinuationIndenter.cpp
@@ -1422,7 +1422,7 @@ unsigned ContinuationIndenter::getNewLineColumn(const LineState &State) {
   // the next line.
   if (State.Line->InPragmaDirective) {
     FormatToken *PragmaType = State.Line->First->Next->Next;
-    if (PragmaType && PragmaType->TokenText.equals("omp"))
+    if (PragmaType && PragmaType->TokenText == "omp")
       return CurrentState.Indent + Style.ContinuationIndentWidth;
   }