[Modules] Improve error message when cannot find parent module for submodule definition.

Before the change the diagnostic for

    module unknown.submodule {}

was "error: expected module name" which is incorrect and misleading
because both "unknown" and "submodule" are valid module names.

We already have a better error message when a parent module is a
submodule itself and is missing. Make the error for a missing top-level
module more like the one for a submodule.

rdar://problem/64424407

Reviewed By: bruno

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84458

3 files changed, 16 insertions, 9 deletions

diff --git a/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticLexKinds.td b/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticLexKinds.td
index 9cb06cf..77d2e26 100644
--- a/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticLexKinds.td
+++ b/clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticLexKinds.td
@@ -695,6 +695,9 @@ def err_mmap_missing_module_unqualified : Error<
   "no module named '%0' visible from '%1'">;
 def err_mmap_missing_module_qualified : Error<
   "no module named '%0' in '%1'">;
+def err_mmap_missing_parent_module: Error<
+  "no module named '%0' %select{found|in '%2'}1, "
+  "parent module must be defined before the submodule">;
 def err_mmap_top_level_inferred_submodule : Error<
   "only submodules and framework modules may be inferred with wildcard syntax">;
 def err_mmap_inferred_no_umbrella : Error<
diff --git a/clang/lib/Lex/ModuleMap.cpp b/clang/lib/Lex/ModuleMap.cpp
index bcdc5b8..12da5a8 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Lex/ModuleMap.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Lex/ModuleMap.cpp
@@ -1903,18 +1903,16 @@ void ModuleMapParser::parseModuleDecl() {
         continue;
       }
 
-      if (ActiveModule) {
-        Diags.Report(Id[I].second, diag::err_mmap_missing_module_qualified)
-          << Id[I].first
-          << ActiveModule->getTopLevelModule()->getFullModuleName();
-      } else {
-        Diags.Report(Id[I].second, diag::err_mmap_expected_module_name);
-      }
+      Diags.Report(Id[I].second, diag::err_mmap_missing_parent_module)
+          << Id[I].first << (ActiveModule != nullptr)
+          << (ActiveModule
+                  ? ActiveModule->getTopLevelModule()->getFullModuleName()
+                  : "");
       HadError = true;
-      return;
     }
 
-    if (ModuleMapFile != Map.getContainingModuleMapFile(TopLevelModule)) {
+    if (TopLevelModule &&
+        ModuleMapFile != Map.getContainingModuleMapFile(TopLevelModule)) {
       assert(ModuleMapFile != Map.getModuleMapFileForUniquing(TopLevelModule) &&
              "submodule defined in same file as 'module *' that allowed its "
              "top-level module");
diff --git a/clang/test/Modules/diagnostics.modulemap b/clang/test/Modules/diagnostics.modulemap
index 01aa0b6..c12fef5 100644
--- a/clang/test/Modules/diagnostics.modulemap
+++ b/clang/test/Modules/diagnostics.modulemap
@@ -28,3 +28,9 @@ module header_attr {
   header "quux.h" { size 1 mtime 2 }
   header "no_attrs.h" {}
 }
+
+// CHECK: diagnostics.modulemap:[[@LINE+1]]:8: error: no module named 'unknown' found, parent module must be defined before the submodule
+module unknown.submodule {}
+module known_top_level {}
+// CHECK: diagnostics.modulemap:[[@LINE+1]]:24: error: no module named 'unknown' in 'known_top_level', parent module must be defined before the submodule
+module known_top_level.unknown.submodule {}