diff options
| author | Michael Flanders <mkf727@cs.washington.edu> | 2024-03-09 22:46:39 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | GitHub <noreply@github.com> | 2024-03-10 01:46:39 -0500 |
| commit | 35b784379e707423f3b4f5a2cfedabcfa6f5b47d (patch) | |
| tree | 7615b9bbb775c15e6e5afca27d4be7b3b34087d3 | |
| parent | d2353ae00c3b0b0e9a9b93578e9bb067f699f193 (diff) | |
| download | llvm-35b784379e707423f3b4f5a2cfedabcfa6f5b47d.zip llvm-35b784379e707423f3b4f5a2cfedabcfa6f5b47d.tar.gz llvm-35b784379e707423f3b4f5a2cfedabcfa6f5b47d.tar.bz2 | |
[libc][stdbit][c23] fixes typos in bit_width, bit_floor C type-generic macros (#84659)
Fixes #84658.
Assuming these were typos in the first place.
I am unsure of the best way to ensure that both sides of the
preprocessor condition in
`libc/include/llvm-libc-macros/stdbit-macros.h` are tested. Could
someone point me in the right direction for adding test coverage to the
non `__cplusplus` branch? Or maybe it is being tested and I've missed
it.
| -rw-r--r-- | libc/include/llvm-libc-macros/stdbit-macros.h | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/libc/include/llvm-libc-macros/stdbit-macros.h b/libc/include/llvm-libc-macros/stdbit-macros.h index 5b51068..e3eb663 100644 --- a/libc/include/llvm-libc-macros/stdbit-macros.h +++ b/libc/include/llvm-libc-macros/stdbit-macros.h @@ -274,14 +274,14 @@ inline unsigned long long stdc_bit_floor(unsigned long long x) { unsigned long long: stdc_has_single_bit_ull)(x) #define stdc_bit_width(x) \ _Generic((x), \ - unsigned char: stdc_bit_width_ui, \ + unsigned char: stdc_bit_width_uc, \ unsigned short: stdc_bit_width_us, \ unsigned: stdc_bit_width_ui, \ unsigned long: stdc_bit_width_ul, \ unsigned long long: stdc_bit_width_ull)(x) #define stdc_bit_floor(x) \ _Generic((x), \ - unsigned char: stdc_bit_floor_ui, \ + unsigned char: stdc_bit_floor_uc, \ unsigned short: stdc_bit_floor_us, \ unsigned: stdc_bit_floor_ui, \ unsigned long: stdc_bit_floor_ul, \ |