diff options
| author | Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> | 2021-10-29 10:29:54 -0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org> | 2021-11-02 11:21:57 -0300 |
| commit | f64f4ce069300f33e26b025ebb0233d5ca3957a5 (patch) | |
| tree | 5605ff671279a79dad283537ffb134c62208010d /elf | |
| parent | cca75bd8b53b82d80299b03b368355b158832c9a (diff) | |
| download | glibc-f64f4ce069300f33e26b025ebb0233d5ca3957a5.zip glibc-f64f4ce069300f33e26b025ebb0233d5ca3957a5.tar.gz glibc-f64f4ce069300f33e26b025ebb0233d5ca3957a5.tar.bz2 | |
elf: Assume disjointed .rela.dyn and .rela.plt for loader
The patch removes the the ELF_DURING_STARTUP optimization and assume
both .rel.dyn and .rel.plt might not be subsequent. This allows some
code simplification since relocation will be handled independently
where it is done on bootstrap.
At least on x86_64_64, I can not measure any performance implications.
Running 10000 time the command
LD_DEBUG=statistics ./elf/ld.so ./libc.so
And filtering the "total startup time in dynamic loader" result,
the geometric mean is:
patched master
Ryzen 7 5900x 24140 24952
i7-4510U 45957 45982
(The results do show some variation, I did not make any statistical
analysis).
It also allows build arm with lld, since it inserts ".ARM.exidx"
between ".rel.dyn" and ".rel.plt" for the loader.
Checked on x86_64-linux-gnu and arm-linux-gnueabihf.
Reviewed-by: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'elf')
| -rw-r--r-- | elf/dynamic-link.h | 32 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 23 deletions
diff --git a/elf/dynamic-link.h b/elf/dynamic-link.h index ac4cc70..f619615 100644 --- a/elf/dynamic-link.h +++ b/elf/dynamic-link.h @@ -65,12 +65,6 @@ elf_machine_lazy_rel (struct link_map *map, struct r_scope_elem *scope[], #ifdef RESOLVE_MAP -# if defined RTLD_BOOTSTRAP || defined STATIC_PIE_BOOTSTRAP -# define ELF_DURING_STARTUP (1) -# else -# define ELF_DURING_STARTUP (0) -# endif - /* Get the definitions of `elf_dynamic_do_rel' and `elf_dynamic_do_rela'. These functions are almost identical, so we use cpp magic to avoid duplicating their code. It cannot be done in a more general function @@ -106,9 +100,8 @@ elf_machine_lazy_rel (struct link_map *map, struct r_scope_elem *scope[], \ if (ranges[0].start + ranges[0].size == (start + size)) \ ranges[0].size -= size; \ - if (ELF_DURING_STARTUP \ - || (!(do_lazy) \ - && (ranges[0].start + ranges[0].size) == start)) \ + if (!(do_lazy) \ + && (ranges[0].start + ranges[0].size) == start) \ { \ /* Combine processing the sections. */ \ ranges[0].size += size; \ @@ -121,20 +114,13 @@ elf_machine_lazy_rel (struct link_map *map, struct r_scope_elem *scope[], } \ } \ \ - if (ELF_DURING_STARTUP) \ - elf_dynamic_do_##reloc ((map), scope, ranges[0].start, ranges[0].size, \ - ranges[0].nrelative, 0, skip_ifunc); \ - else \ - { \ - int ranges_index; \ - for (ranges_index = 0; ranges_index < 2; ++ranges_index) \ - elf_dynamic_do_##reloc ((map), scope, \ - ranges[ranges_index].start, \ - ranges[ranges_index].size, \ - ranges[ranges_index].nrelative, \ - ranges[ranges_index].lazy, \ - skip_ifunc); \ - } \ + for (int ranges_index = 0; ranges_index < 2; ++ranges_index) \ + elf_dynamic_do_##reloc ((map), scope, \ + ranges[ranges_index].start, \ + ranges[ranges_index].size, \ + ranges[ranges_index].nrelative, \ + ranges[ranges_index].lazy, \ + skip_ifunc); \ } while (0) # if ELF_MACHINE_NO_REL || ELF_MACHINE_NO_RELA |