diff options
| author | Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> | 2012-08-10 05:03:13 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> | 2012-08-10 05:03:13 +0000 |
| commit | de0bea007c446f40ecec90a2672e0a806d397e1a (patch) | |
| tree | 239ac66f780b5afdb4cdc3e2115100a096c7e9b4 /gdb/common | |
| parent | 44534af395e517016f70c2b0baee26f810391843 (diff) | |
| download | gdb-de0bea007c446f40ecec90a2672e0a806d397e1a.zip gdb-de0bea007c446f40ecec90a2672e0a806d397e1a.tar.gz gdb-de0bea007c446f40ecec90a2672e0a806d397e1a.tar.bz2 | |
gdb: add completion handler for "handle" and "signal"
The command line completion has spoiled me. Thus the lack of completion with
the "handle" command annoys me. Patch!
This does a few things:
- adds a VEC_merge helper
- adds a generic signal completer
- adds a completion handler for the "handle" command
- sets the completion handler for the "signal" command
URL: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10436
Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/common')
| -rw-r--r-- | gdb/common/vec.h | 72 |
1 files changed, 72 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/common/vec.h b/gdb/common/vec.h index 49116e1..a99bcd6 100644 --- a/gdb/common/vec.h +++ b/gdb/common/vec.h @@ -210,6 +210,13 @@ #define VEC_copy(T,V) (VEC_OP(T,copy)(V)) +/* Merge two vectors. + VEC(T,A) *VEC_T_merge(VEC(T) *, VEC(T) *); + + Copy the live elements of both vectors into a new vector. The new + and old vectors need not be allocated by the same mechanism. */ +#define VEC_merge(T,V1,V2) (VEC_OP(T,merge)(V1, V2)) + /* Determine if a vector has additional capacity. int VEC_T_space (VEC(T) *v,int reserve) @@ -461,6 +468,28 @@ static inline VEC(T) *VEC_OP (T,copy) (VEC(T) *vec_) \ return new_vec_; \ } \ \ +static inline VEC(T) *VEC_OP (T,merge) (VEC(T) *vec1_, VEC(T) *vec2_) \ +{ \ + if (vec1_ && vec2_) \ + { \ + size_t len_ = vec1_->num + vec2_->num; \ + VEC (T) *new_vec_ = NULL; \ + \ + /* We must request exact size allocation, hence the negation. */ \ + new_vec_ = (VEC (T) *) \ + vec_o_reserve (NULL, -len_, offsetof (VEC(T),vec), sizeof (T)); \ + \ + new_vec_->num = len_; \ + memcpy (new_vec_->vec, vec1_->vec, sizeof (T) * vec1_->num); \ + memcpy (new_vec_->vec + vec1_->num, vec2_->vec, \ + sizeof (T) * vec2_->num); \ + \ + return new_vec_; \ + } \ + else \ + return VEC_copy (T, vec1_ ? vec1_ : vec2_); \ +} \ + \ static inline void VEC_OP (T,free) \ (VEC(T) **vec_) \ { \ @@ -741,6 +770,27 @@ static inline VEC(T) *VEC_OP (T,copy) (VEC(T) *vec_) \ return new_vec_; \ } \ \ +static inline VEC(T) *VEC_OP (T,merge) (VEC(T) *vec1_, VEC(T) *vec2_) \ +{ \ + if (vec1_ && vec2_) \ + { \ + size_t len_ = vec1_->num + vec2_->num; \ + VEC (T) *new_vec_ = NULL; \ + \ + /* We must request exact size allocation, hence the negation. */ \ + new_vec_ = (VEC (T) *)(vec_p_reserve (NULL, -len_)); \ + \ + new_vec_->num = len_; \ + memcpy (new_vec_->vec, vec1_->vec, sizeof (T) * vec1_->num); \ + memcpy (new_vec_->vec + vec1_->num, vec2_->vec, \ + sizeof (T) * vec2_->num); \ + \ + return new_vec_; \ + } \ + else \ + return VEC_copy (T, vec1_ ? vec1_ : vec2_); \ +} \ + \ static inline int VEC_OP (T,reserve) \ (VEC(T) **vec_, int alloc_ VEC_ASSERT_DECL) \ { \ @@ -975,6 +1025,28 @@ static inline VEC(T) *VEC_OP (T,copy) (VEC(T) *vec_) \ return new_vec_; \ } \ \ +static inline VEC(T) *VEC_OP (T,merge) (VEC(T) *vec1_, VEC(T) *vec2_) \ +{ \ + if (vec1_ && vec2_) \ + { \ + size_t len_ = vec1_->num + vec2_->num; \ + VEC (T) *new_vec_ = NULL; \ + \ + /* We must request exact size allocation, hence the negation. */ \ + new_vec_ = (VEC (T) *) \ + vec_o_reserve (NULL, -len_, offsetof (VEC(T),vec), sizeof (T)); \ + \ + new_vec_->num = len_; \ + memcpy (new_vec_->vec, vec1_->vec, sizeof (T) * vec1_->num); \ + memcpy (new_vec_->vec + vec1_->num, vec2_->vec, \ + sizeof (T) * vec2_->num); \ + \ + return new_vec_; \ + } \ + else \ + return VEC_copy (T, vec1_ ? vec1_ : vec2_); \ +} \ + \ static inline void VEC_OP (T,free) \ (VEC(T) **vec_) \ { \ |