diff options
author | Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com> | 2024-05-05 11:00:04 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com> | 2024-05-10 14:21:21 +0100 |
commit | a4f76c0765a0b9c643dc91d5a398a1cd9519572b (patch) | |
tree | 863f44e6daf20cb51d996417849512ea34f3d0fe | |
parent | 2b34e06765779335cef45a579e7a5698e198472b (diff) | |
download | gdb-a4f76c0765a0b9c643dc91d5a398a1cd9519572b.zip gdb-a4f76c0765a0b9c643dc91d5a398a1cd9519572b.tar.gz gdb-a4f76c0765a0b9c643dc91d5a398a1cd9519572b.tar.bz2 |
gdb: add gdbarch_stack_grows_down function
In another patch I'm working on I needed to ask: does the stack grow
down, or grow up?
Looking around I found in infcall.c some code where we needed to ask
the same question, what we do there is ask:
gdbarch_inner_than (gdbarch, 1, 2)
which should do the job. However, I don't particularly like copying
this, it feels like we're asking something slightly different that
just happens to align with the question we're actually asking.
I propose adding a new function `gdbarch_stack_grows_down`. This is
not going to be a gdbarch method that can be overridden, instead, this
will just call the gdbarch_inner_than function. We already have some
gdbarch methods like this, checkout arch-utils.c for examples.
I think it's now clearer what we're actually doing.
A new self-test ensures that all architectures have a stack that
either grows down, or grows up.
There should be no user visible changes after this commit.
Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
-rw-r--r-- | gdb/gdbarch-selftests.c | 18 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | gdb/gdbarch.h | 8 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | gdb/infcall.c | 10 |
3 files changed, 30 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/gdbarch-selftests.c b/gdb/gdbarch-selftests.c index 0dc0c50..db99fe0 100644 --- a/gdb/gdbarch-selftests.c +++ b/gdb/gdbarch-selftests.c @@ -164,6 +164,21 @@ register_name_test (struct gdbarch *gdbarch) } } +/* Test gdbarch_stack_grows_down. Stacks must either grow down or up. */ + +static void +check_stack_growth (struct gdbarch *gdbarch) +{ + /* We don't call gdbarch_stack_grows_down here, instead we're testing the + implementation by calling gdbarch_inner_than. GDB assumes that stacks + either grow down or up (see uses of gdbarch_stack_grows_down), so exactly + one of these needs to be true. */ + bool stack_grows_down = gdbarch_inner_than (gdbarch, 1, 2) != 0; + bool stack_grows_up = gdbarch_inner_than (gdbarch, 2, 1) != 0; + + SELF_CHECK (stack_grows_up != stack_grows_down); +} + } // namespace selftests void _initialize_gdbarch_selftests (); @@ -175,4 +190,7 @@ _initialize_gdbarch_selftests () selftests::register_test_foreach_arch ("register_name", selftests::register_name_test); + + selftests::register_test_foreach_arch ("stack_growth", + selftests::check_stack_growth); } diff --git a/gdb/gdbarch.h b/gdb/gdbarch.h index 77d3406..d4c6795 100644 --- a/gdb/gdbarch.h +++ b/gdb/gdbarch.h @@ -370,4 +370,12 @@ gdbarch_num_cooked_regs (gdbarch *arch) return gdbarch_num_regs (arch) + gdbarch_num_pseudo_regs (arch); } +/* Return true if stacks for ARCH grow down, otherwise return true. */ + +static inline bool +gdbarch_stack_grows_down (gdbarch *arch) +{ + return gdbarch_inner_than (arch, 1, 2) != 0; +} + #endif diff --git a/gdb/infcall.c b/gdb/infcall.c index 23d5652..edac9a7 100644 --- a/gdb/infcall.c +++ b/gdb/infcall.c @@ -947,7 +947,7 @@ reserve_stack_space (const type *values_type, CORE_ADDR &sp) struct gdbarch *gdbarch = get_frame_arch (frame); CORE_ADDR addr = 0; - if (gdbarch_inner_than (gdbarch, 1, 2)) + if (gdbarch_stack_grows_down (gdbarch)) { /* Stack grows downward. Align STRUCT_ADDR and SP after making space. */ @@ -1128,7 +1128,7 @@ call_function_by_hand_dummy (struct value *function, address. AMD64 called that region the "red zone". Skip at least the "red zone" size before allocating any space on the stack. */ - if (gdbarch_inner_than (gdbarch, 1, 2)) + if (gdbarch_stack_grows_down (gdbarch)) sp -= gdbarch_frame_red_zone_size (gdbarch); else sp += gdbarch_frame_red_zone_size (gdbarch); @@ -1156,11 +1156,9 @@ call_function_by_hand_dummy (struct value *function, to pay :-). */ if (sp == old_sp) { - if (gdbarch_inner_than (gdbarch, 1, 2)) - /* Stack grows down. */ + if (gdbarch_stack_grows_down (gdbarch)) sp = gdbarch_frame_align (gdbarch, old_sp - 1); else - /* Stack grows up. */ sp = gdbarch_frame_align (gdbarch, old_sp + 1); } /* SP may have underflown address zero here from OLD_SP. Memory access @@ -1193,7 +1191,7 @@ call_function_by_hand_dummy (struct value *function, { CORE_ADDR lastval_addr = lastval->address (); - if (gdbarch_inner_than (gdbarch, 1, 2)) + if (gdbarch_stack_grows_down (gdbarch)) { gdb_assert (sp >= lastval_addr); sp = lastval_addr; |