diff options
author | Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com> | 2024-10-15 13:13:15 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com> | 2024-10-15 13:13:15 -0400 |
commit | bb2bfdb2048aed18ef7dc01b51816a800e83ce54 (patch) | |
tree | fba3663b37461557913ef177627c40ac1f0bb823 /libcpp/files.cc | |
parent | 0fa5017df91731fb276aef5ded8a153e80bae358 (diff) | |
download | gcc-bb2bfdb2048aed18ef7dc01b51816a800e83ce54.zip gcc-bb2bfdb2048aed18ef7dc01b51816a800e83ce54.tar.gz gcc-bb2bfdb2048aed18ef7dc01b51816a800e83ce54.tar.bz2 |
c++: checking ICE w/ constexpr if and lambda as def targ [PR117054]
Here we're tripping over the assert in extract_locals_r which enforces
that an extra-args tree appearing inside another extra-args tree doesn't
actually have extra args. This invariant doesn't always hold for lambdas
(which recently gained the extra-args mechanism) but that should be
harmless since cp_walk_subtrees doesn't walk LAMBDA_EXPR_EXTRA_ARGS and
so should be immune to the PR114303 issue for now. So let's just disable
this assert for lambdas.
PR c++/117054
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* pt.cc (extract_locals_r): Disable tree_extra_args assert
for LAMBDA_EXPR.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp2a/lambda-targ9.C: New test.
Reviewed-by: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'libcpp/files.cc')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions