blob: 946304af84d36f497d74011873993c9e84b4750d (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
|
# Copyright 2022-2024 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
# (at your option) any later version.
#
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
# GNU General Public License for more details.
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
# Test that placing a line breakpoint outside a function results in a pending
# breakpoint. More importantly, that it does "drift" and place a
# breakpoint on the next function.
#
# See the .c file for more details.
standard_testfile
set shlib_path [standard_output_file ${testfile}-lib.so]
if {[build_executable "build shlib" $shlib_path $srcfile {debug shlib}]} {
return
}
set opts [list debug shlib_load additional_flags=-DTHE_LIB_PATH="${shlib_path}"]
if {[build_executable "failed to prepare" ${testfile} ${srcfile} $opts]} {
return
}
proc do_test {} {
clean_restart $::binfile
# To make things easier, just so we don't have to deal with the question.
gdb_test_no_output "set breakpoint pending on"
set lineno [gdb_get_line_number "break here"]
gdb_test "break $lineno" \
[multi_line \
"No compiled code for line $lineno in the current file\\." \
"Breakpoint 1 \\($lineno\\) pending\\."] \
"breakpoint on a line outside any function"
gdb_run_cmd
gdb_test_multiple "" "stop on lib function breakpoint" {
-re -wrap "Breakpoint 1, the_lib_func .*29.*x\\+\\+.*" {
pass $gdb_test_name
}
}
}
do_test
|
