blob: bb232cb74573ccbae350d50d7c964bc26a98fb6d (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
|
/* This testcase is part of GDB, the GNU debugger.
Copyright 2024 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
(at your option) any later version.
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
GNU General Public License for more details.
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
/* Construct "foo<(enum_test)*>()" symbols. These symbols can be tricky
to handle, because of having a type cast inside the template parameter
list, the "<(enum_test)*>" part. The "<(" sequence in there can throw
a wrench in "cp_search_name_hash()" function that tries to process
things like "operator<(...)" while ignoring template parameter lists
at the same time.
If a breakpoint can be set on "foo", then all is in good order. */
enum enum_test
{
zero = 0,
one
};
/* A template with a non-type parameter. */
template <enum_test test>
void
foo ()
{
}
int
main ()
{
/* Instantiate a "foo<(enum_test)1>()" symbol explicitly. */
foo<(enum_test)1> ();
/* Some compilers, like g++, transform "enum_test::zero" to
"(enum_test)0". For such compilers, this "foo" instance
would become "foo<(enum_test)0>()". */
foo<enum_test::zero> ();
return 0;
}
|
