aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb/testsuite/gdb.multi
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
42 hoursUpdate copyright dates to include 2025Tom Tromey65-65/+65
This updates the copyright headers to include 2025. I did this by running gdb/copyright.py and then manually modifying a few files as noted by the script. Approved-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
2025-02-05Print only process ptids from linux-fork.cKevin Buettner1-1/+1
This commit causes a "process ptid" to be passed to all calls of target_pid_to_str in linux-fork.c. A "process ptid" is one in which only the pid component is set to a non-zero value; both the lwp and tid components are zero. The reason for doing this is that pids associated with checkpoints can never be a thread due to the fact that checkpoints (which are implemented by forking a process) can only (reasonably) work with single-threaded processes. Without this commit, many of the "info checkpoints" commands in gdb.multi/checkpoint-multi.exp will incorrectly show some of the checkpoints as threads. E.g... Id Active Target Id Frame * 1.0 y Thread 0x7ffff7cb5740 (LWP 581704) at 0x401199, file hello.c, line 51 1.2 n process 581716 at 0x401199, file hello.c, line 51 1.3 n process 581717 at 0x401199, file hello.c, line 51 2.1 n process 581708 at 0x401258, file goodbye.c, line 62 2.2 y Thread 0x7ffff7cb5740 (LWP 581712) at 0x401258, file goodbye.c, line 62 3.0 y Thread 0x7ffff7cb5740 (LWP 581713) at 0x40115c, file hangout.c, line 31 3.2 n process 581715 at 0x40115c, file hangout.c, line 31 (gdb With this commit in place, the output looks like this instead: Id Active Target Id Frame * 1.0 y process 535276 at 0x401199, file hello.c, line 51 1.2 n process 535288 at 0x401199, file hello.c, line 51 1.3 n process 535289 at 0x401199, file hello.c, line 51 2.1 n process 535280 at 0x401258, file goodbye.c, line 62 2.2 y process 535284 at 0x401258, file goodbye.c, line 62 3.0 y process 535285 at 0x40115c, file hangout.c, line 31 3.2 n process 535287 at 0x40115c, file hangout.c, line 31 (For brevity, I've removed the directory elements in each of the paths above.) The testcase, gdb.multi/checkpoint-multi.exp, has been updated to reflect the fact that only "process" should now appear in output from "info checkpoints". Reviewed-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2025-02-05Capitalize output of successful checkpoint commandKevin Buettner1-1/+1
This commit causes the output of a "checkpoint" command to be changed from: checkpoint N: fork returned pid DDDD to: Checkpoint N: fork returned pid DDDD This change was made to bring the output of the "checkpoint" command in line with that of other commands, e.g.: (gdb) break main Breakpoint 1 at ... (gdb) catch exec Catchpoint 2 (exec) (gdb) add-inferior [New inferior 2] Added inferior 2 The tests gdb.base/checkpoint.exp, gdb.base/kill-during-detach.exp, and gdb.multi/checkpoint-multi.exp have been updated to accept the new (capitalized) output from the "checkpoint" command. Reviewed-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2025-02-05Make linux checkpoints work with multiple inferiorsKevin Buettner1-0/+800
The current linux checkpoint code, most of which may be found in linux-fork.c, is quite broken when attempting to use more than one inferior. Running GDB will show internal errors when starting two inferiors, placing a checkpoint in one, then switching to the other and doing one of the following commands, "restart", "detach", "kill", or continue (to program exit). Test cases for two of those scenarios may be found in this bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31065 I've tested for each of the scenarios and many more in the new test case, gdb.multi/checkpoint-multi.exp. I started off with the goal of fixing just those problems, and was mostly successful with a much smaller patch, but doing "info checkpoints" with more than one inferior didn't work correctly due to some of the inferiors being in the wrong program space. That led me to making the linux-fork code fully inferior-aware. Prior to this commit, the list of forks was being maintained in a global named named 'fork_list'. I turned this into a per-inferior data structure. There was also global named 'highest_fork_num' which is also now part of the per-inferior struct. A registry key named 'checkpoint_inferior_data_key' along with function 'get_checkpoint_inferior_data' is used to access the per-inferior data. This new function, get_checkpoint_inferior_data, is only called by the new functions 'fork_list', 'reset_highest_fork_num', and increment_highest_fork_num, each of which is passed a pointer to the inferior. Most occurrences referring to the (previously) global 'fork_list' have been replaced by 'fork_list (inf)'. In some functions, where the 'fork_list' is referenced multiple times, a local named 'fork_list' is declared and initialized instead, like this: auto &fork_list = ::fork_list (inf); The constructor for 'struct fork_info' has gained an additional parameter. In addition to passing the pid of the new fork, we now also pass the fork identifier, fork_num, to the constructor. This integer is shown to the user in the "info checkpoints" command and is provided by the user, perhaps in conjunction with the inferior number, in commands which manipulate checkpoints, e.g. 'restart' and 'delete checkpoint'. When checkpoints are used in only one inferior, this commit will present information to the user and will accept checkpoint identifiers to commands in much the same way as the code did before this commit. Per Pedro Alves's recommendations, the "info checkpoints" command has been changed somewhat. "info checkpoints" used to display "(main process)" for the first process in the checkpoint list. This is no longer done because it does not provide useful information. It also used to display "<running>", when the process is running and no useful frame information may be displayed. This has been changed to "(running)" in order to be more consistent with the output of the "info threads" command. A new column has been added to the output for showing the active process in the output from "info checkpoints". This column will display 'y' for the active process and 'n' for the others. For the active inferior a '*' is also printed preceding the checkpoint identifier. Here's what things look(ed) like before and after for just one inferior: Before: (gdb) info checkpoints * 0 Thread 0x7ffff7cd3740 (LWP 84201) (main process) at 0x40114a, file hello.c, line 28 1 process 84205 at 0x401199, file hello.c, line 51 2 process 84206 at 0x4011a3, file hello.c, line 53 After: (gdb) info checkpoints Id Active Target Id Frame * 0 y process 551311 at 0x40114a, file hello.c, line 28 1 n process 551314 at 0x401199, file hello.c, line 51 2 n process 551315 at 0x4011a3, file hello.c, line 53 (The Thread versus process distinction is handled by another patch - the "After" example assumes that patch is applied too.) When there are multiple inferiors, the "info checkpoints" output looks like this: (gdb) info checkpoints Id Active Target Id Frame 1.0 y process 535276 at 0x401199, file hello.c, line 51 1.1 n process 535283 at 0x401199, file hello.c, line 51 1.2 n process 535288 at 0x401199, file hello.c, line 51 2.1 n process 535280 at 0x401258, file goodbye.c, line 62 2.2 y process 535284 at 0x401258, file goodbye.c, line 62 * 3.0 y process 535285 at 0x40115c, file hangout.c, line 31 3.2 n process 535287 at 0x40115c, file hangout.c, line 31 A new function named 'parse_checkpoint_id' has been added. As its name suggests, it's responsible for parsing a string representing a checkpoint identifier. These identifiers may be either a decimal number representing the checkpoint number in the current inferior or two decimal numbers separated by '.', in which case the first is the inferior number and the second is the checkpoint number in that inferior. It is called by delete_checkpoint_command, detach_checkpoint_command, info_checkpoints_command, and restart_command. Calls to 'parse_checkpoint_id' replace calls to 'parse_and_eval_long', plus error checking and error reporting code near the calls to 'parse_and_eval_long'. As such, error checking and reporting has been consolidated into a single function and the messages output are more uniform, though this has necessitated changes to the existing test case gdb.base/checkpoint.exp. The functions 'find_fork_ptid' and 'find_fork_pid' used to return a pointer to a fork_info struct. They now return a pair consisting of the pointer to a fork_info struct in addition to a pointer to the inferior containing that checkpoint. 'find_fork_id' returns a pointer to a fork_info struct just as it did before, but it's now gained a new parameter, 'inf', which is the inferior in which to look. info_checkpoints_command used to simply iterate over the list of forks (checkpoints), printing each one out. It now needs to iterate over all inferiors and, for those which have checkpoints, it needs to iterate over the list of checkpoints in that inferior. As noted earlier, the format of the output has been changed so that checkpoint identifiers incorporating an inferior number may be printed. linux_fork_context, called by restart_command, now contains code to switch inferiors when the fork being restarted is in an inferior which is different from the current one. The scoped_switch_fork_info class now also contains code for switching inferiors in both the constructor and destructor. gdb/linux-nat.c has a few changes. All but one of them are related to passing the inferior to one of the linux-fork functions. But one of the tests in linux_nat_target::detach has also changed in a non-obvious way. In attempting to determine whether to call linux_fork_detach(), that code used to do: if (pid == inferior_ptid.pid () && forks_exist_p ()) It's been simplified to: if (forks_exist_p (inf)) I had added the 'pid == inferior_ptid.pid ()' condition in late 2023 while working on a detach bug. It was kind of a hack to prevent calling linux_fork_detach() when in a different inferior. That's no longer needed since the call to forks_exist_p does this directly - i.e. it is now inferior-aware. Finally, the header file 'linux-fork.h' has been updated to reflect the fact that add_fork, linux_fork_killall, linux_fork_detach, and forks_exist_p all now require that a pointer to an inferior be passed to these functions. Additionally (as mentioned earlier), find_fork_pid now returns std::pair<fork_info *, inferior *> instead 'of fork_info *'. Bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31065 Reviewed-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2024-10-14gdb/testsuite: fix gdb.multi/inferior-specific-bp.expGuinevere Larsen1-1/+2
A recent commit, "16a6f7d2ee3 gdb: avoid breakpoint::clear_locations calls in update_breakpoint_locations", started checking if GDB correctly relocates a breakpoint from inferior 1's declaration of the function "bar" to inferior 2's declaration. Unfortunately, inferior 2 never calls bar in its regular execution, and because of that, clang would optimize that whole function away, making it so there is no location for the breakpoint to be relocated to. This commit changes the .c file so that the function is not optimized away and the test fully passes with clang. It is important to actually call bar instead of using __attribute__((used)) because the latter causes the breakpoint locations to be inverted, 3.1 belongs to inferior 2 and 3.2 belongs to inferior 1, which will cause an unrelated failure. Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2024-10-08gdb: avoid breakpoint::clear_locations calls in update_breakpoint_locationsAndrew Burgess4-2/+93
The commit: commit 6cce025114ccd0f53cc552fde12b6329596c6c65 Date: Fri Mar 3 19:03:15 2023 +0000 gdb: only insert thread-specific breakpoints in the relevant inferior added a couple of calls to breakpoint::clear_locations() inside update_breakpoint_locations(). The intention of these calls was to avoid leaving redundant locations around when a thread- or inferior-specific breakpoint was switched from one thread or inferior to another. Without the clear_locations() calls the tests gdb.multi/tids.exp and gdb.multi/pending-bp.exp have some failures. A b/p is changed such that the program space it is associated with changes. This triggers a call to breakpoint_re_set_one() but the FILTER_PSPACE argument will be the new program space. As a result GDB correctly calculates the new locations and adds these to the breakpoint, but the old locations, in the old program space, are incorrectly retained. The call to clear_locations() solves this by deleting the old locations. However, while working on another patch I realised that the approach taken here is not correct. The FILTER_PSPACE argument passed to breakpoint_re_set_one() and then on to update_breakpoint_locations() might not be the program space to which the breakpoint is associated. Consider this example: (gdb) file /tmp/hello.x Reading symbols from /tmp/hello.x... (gdb) start Temporary breakpoint 1 at 0x401198: file hello.c, line 18. Starting program: /tmp/hello.x Temporary breakpoint 1, main () at hello.c:18 18 printf ("Hello World\n"); (gdb) break main thread 1 Breakpoint 2 at 0x401198: file hello.c, line 18. (gdb) info breakpoints Num Type Disp Enb Address What 2 breakpoint keep y 0x0000000000401198 in main at hello.c:18 stop only in thread 1 (gdb) add-inferior -exec /tmp/hello.x [New inferior 2] Added inferior 2 on connection 1 (native) Reading symbols from /tmp/hello.x... (gdb) info breakpoints Num Type Disp Enb Address What 2 breakpoint keep y <PENDING> main stop only in thread 1.1 Notice that after creating the second inferior and loading a file the thread-specific breakpoint was incorrectly made pending. Loading the exec file in the second inferior triggered a call to breakpoint_re_set() with the new, second, program space as the current_program_space. This program space ends up being passed to update_breakpoint_locations(). In update_breakpoint_locations this condition is true: if (all_locations_are_pending (b, filter_pspace) && sals.empty ()) and so we end up discarding all of the locations for this breakpoint, making the breakpoint pending. What we really want to do in update_breakpoint_locations() is, for thread- or inferior- specific breakpoints, delete any locations which are associated with a program space that this breakpoint is NOT associated with. But then I realised the answer was easier than that. The ONLY time that a b/p can have locations associated with the "wrong" program space like this is at the moment we change the thread or inferior the b/p is associated with by calling breakpoint_set_thread() or breakpoint_set_inferior(). And so, I think the correct solution is to hoist the call to clear_locations() out of update_breakpoint_locations() and place a call in each of the breakpoint_set_{thread,inferior} functions. I've done this, and added a couple of new tests. All of which are now passing. Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2024-10-06[gdb] Fix common misspellingsTom de Vries1-1/+1
Fix the following common misspellings: ... accidently -> accidentally additonal -> additional addresing -> addressing adress -> address agaisnt -> against albiet -> albeit arbitary -> arbitrary artifical -> artificial auxillary -> auxiliary auxilliary -> auxiliary bcak -> back begining -> beginning cannonical -> canonical compatiblity -> compatibility completetion -> completion diferent -> different emited -> emitted emiting -> emitting emmitted -> emitted everytime -> every time excercise -> exercise existance -> existence fucntion -> function funtion -> function guarentee -> guarantee htis -> this immediatly -> immediately layed -> laid noone -> no one occurances -> occurrences occured -> occurred originaly -> originally preceeded -> preceded preceeds -> precedes propogate -> propagate publically -> publicly refering -> referring substract -> subtract substracting -> subtracting substraction -> subtraction taht -> that targetting -> targeting teh -> the thier -> their thru -> through transfered -> transferred transfering -> transferring upto -> up to vincinity -> vicinity whcih -> which whereever -> wherever wierd -> weird withing -> within writen -> written wtih -> with doesnt -> doesn't ... Tested on x86_64-linux.
2024-09-30gdb, testsuite: clean duplicate header includesGerlicher, Klaus1-1/+0
Some of the gdb and testsuite files double include some headers. While all headers use include guards, it helps a bit keeping the code base tidy. No functional change. Approved-by: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
2024-09-07gdb: only insert thread-specific breakpoints in the relevant inferiorAndrew Burgess7-24/+219
This commit updates GDB so that thread or inferior specific breakpoints are only inserted into the program space in which the specific thread or inferior is running. In terms of implementation, getting this basically working is easy enough, now that a breakpoint's thread or inferior field is setup prior to GDB looking for locations, we can easily use this information to find a suitable program_space and pass this to as a filter when creating the sals. Or we could if breakpoint_ops::create_sals_from_location_spec allowed us to pass in a filter program_space. So, this commit extends breakpoint_ops::create_sals_from_location_spec to take a program_space argument, and uses this to filter the set of returned sals. This accounts for about half the change in this patch. The second set of changes starts from breakpoint_set_thread and breakpoint_set_inferior, this is called when the thread or inferior for a breakpoint changes, e.g. from the Python API. Previously this call would never result in the locations of a breakpoint changing, after all, locations were inserted in every program space, and we just use the thread or inferior variable to decide when we should stop. Now though, changing a breakpoint's thread or inferior can mean we need to figure out a new set of breakpoint locations. To support this I've added a new breakpoint_re_set_one function, which is like breakpoint_re_set, but takes a single breakpoint, and just updates the locations for that one breakpoint. We only need to call this function if the program_space in which a breakpoint's thread (or inferior) is running actually changes. If the program_space does change then we call the new breakpoint_re_set_one function passing in the program_space which should be used to filter the new locations (or nullptr to indicate we should set locations in all program spaces). This filter program_space needs to propagate down to all the re_set methods, this accounts for the remaining half of the changes in this patch. There were a couple of existing tests that created thread or inferior specific breakpoints and then checked the 'info breakpoints' output, these needed updating. These were: gdb.mi/user-selected-context-sync.exp gdb.multi/bp-thread-specific.exp gdb.multi/multi-target-continue.exp gdb.multi/multi-target-ping-pong-next.exp gdb.multi/tids.exp gdb.mi/new-ui-bp-deleted.exp gdb.multi/inferior-specific-bp.exp gdb.multi/pending-bp-del-inferior.exp I've also added some additional tests to: gdb.multi/pending-bp.exp I've updated the documentation and added a NEWS entry. Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
2024-09-07gdb: don't set breakpoint::pspace in create_breakpointAndrew Burgess2-0/+244
I spotted this code within create_breakpoint: if ((type_wanted != bp_breakpoint && type_wanted != bp_hardware_breakpoint) || thread != -1) b->pspace = current_program_space; this code is only executed when creating a pending breakpoint, and sets the breakpoint::pspace member variable. The above code gained the 'thread != -1' clause with this commit: commit cc72b2a2da6d6372cbdb1d14639a5fce84e1a325 Date: Fri Dec 23 17:06:16 2011 +0000 Introduce gdb.FinishBreakpoint in Python While the type_wanted checks were added with this commit: commit f8eba3c61629b3c03ac1f33853eab4d8507adb9c Date: Tue Dec 6 18:54:43 2011 +0000 the "ambiguous linespec" series Before this breakpoint::pspace was set unconditionally. If we look at how breakpoint::pspace is used today, some breakpoint types specifically set this field, either in their constructors, or in a wrapper function that calls the constructor. So, the watchpoint type and its sub-class set this variable, as does the catchpoint type, and all it's sub-classes. However, code_breakpoint doesn't specifically set this field within its constructor, though some sub-classes of code_breakpoint (ada_catchpoint, exception_catchpoint, internal_breakpoint, and momentary_breakpoint) do set this field. When I examine all the places that breakpoint::pspace is used, I believe that in every place where it is expected that this field is set, the breakpoint type will be one that specifically sets this field. Next, I observe two problems with the existing code. First, the above code is only hit for pending breakpoints, there's no equivalent code for non-pending breakpoints. This opens up the possibility of GDB entering non-consistent states; if a breakpoint is first created pending and then later gets a location, the pspace field will be set, while if the breakpoint is immediately non-pending, then the pspace field will never be set. Second, if we look at how breakpoint::pspace is used in the function breakpoint_program_space_exit, we see that when a program space is removed, any breakpoint with breakpoint::pspace set to the removed program space, will be deleted. This makes sense, but does mean we need to ensure breakpoint::pspace is only set for breakpoints that apply to a single program space. So, if I create a pending dprintf breakpoint (type bp_dprintf) then the breakpoint::pspace variable will be set even though the dprintf is not really tied to that one program space. As a result, when the matching program space is removed the dprintf is incorrectly removed. Also, if I create a thread specific breakpoint, then, thanks to the 'thread != -1' clause the wrong program space will be stored in breakpoint::pspace (the current program space is always used, which might not be the program space that corresponds to the selected thread), as a result, the thread specific breakpoint will be deleted when the matching program space is removed. If we look at commit cc72b2a2da6d which added the 'thread != -1' clause, we can see this change was entirely redundant, the breakpoint::pspace is also set in bpfinishpy_init after create_breakpoint has been called. As such, I think we can safely drop the 'thread != -1' clause. For the other problems, I'm proposing to be pretty aggressive - I'd like to drop the breakpoint::pspace assignment completely from create_breakpoint. Having looked at how this variable is used, I believe that it is already set elsewhere in all the cases that it is needed. Maybe this code was needed at one time, but I can't see how it's needed any more. There's tests to expose the issues I've spotted with this code, and there's no regressions in testing.
2024-09-07gdb: parse pending breakpoint thread/task immediatelyAndrew Burgess1-2/+2
The initial motivation for this commit was to allow thread or inferior specific breakpoints to only be inserted within the appropriate inferior's program-space. The benefit of this is that inferiors for which the breakpoint does not apply will no longer need to stop, and then resume, for such breakpoints. This commit does not make this change, but is a refactor to allow this to happen in a later commit. The problem we currently have is that when a thread-specific (or inferior-specific) breakpoint is created, the thread (or inferior) number is only parsed by calling find_condition_and_thread_for_sals. This function is only called for non-pending breakpoints, and requires that we know the locations at which the breakpoint will be placed (for expression checking in case the breakpoint is also conditional). A consequence of this is that by the time we figure out the breakpoint is thread-specific we have already looked up locations in all program spaces. This feels wasteful -- if we knew the thread-id earlier then we could reduce the work GDB does by only looking up locations within the program space for which the breakpoint applies. Another consequence of how find_condition_and_thread_for_sals is called is that pending breakpoints don't currently know they are thread-specific, nor even that they are conditional! Additionally, by delaying parsing the thread-id, pending breakpoints can be created for non-existent threads, this is different to how non-pending breakpoints are handled, so I can do this: $ gdb -q ./gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.multi/pending-bp/pending-bp Reading symbols from ./gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.multi/pending-bp/pending-bp... (gdb) break foo thread 99 Function "foo" not defined. Make breakpoint pending on future shared library load? (y or [n]) y Breakpoint 1 (foo thread 99) pending. (gdb) r Starting program: /tmp/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.multi/pending-bp/pending-bp [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1". Error in re-setting breakpoint 1: Unknown thread 99. [Inferior 1 (process 3329749) exited normally] (gdb) GDB only checked the validity of 'thread 99' at the point the 'foo' location became non-pending. In contrast, if I try this: $ gdb -q ./gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.multi/pending-bp/pending-bp Reading symbols from ./gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.multi/pending-bp/pending-bp... (gdb) break main thread 99 Unknown thread 99. (gdb) GDB immediately checks if 'thread 99' exists. I think inconsistencies like this are confusing, and should be fixed if possible. In this commit the create_breakpoint function is updated so that the extra_string, which contains the thread, inferior, task, and/or condition information, is parsed immediately, even for pending breakpoints. Obviously, the condition still can't be validated until the breakpoint becomes non-pending, but the thread, inferior, and task information can be pulled from the extra-string, and can be validated early on, even for pending breakpoints. The -force-condition flag is also parsed as part of this early parsing change. There are a couple of benefits to doing this: 1. Printing of breakpoints is more consistent now. Consider creating a conditional breakpoint before this commit: (gdb) set breakpoint pending on (gdb) break pendingfunc if (0) Function "pendingfunc" not defined. Breakpoint 1 (pendingfunc if (0)) pending. (gdb) break main if (0) Breakpoint 2 at 0x401198: file /tmp/hello.c, line 18. (gdb) info breakpoints Num Type Disp Enb Address What 1 breakpoint keep y <PENDING> pendingfunc if (0) 2 breakpoint keep y 0x0000000000401198 in main at /tmp/hello.c:18 stop only if (0) (gdb) And after this commit: (gdb) set breakpoint pending on (gdb) break pendingfunc if (0) Function "pendingfunc" not defined. Breakpoint 1 (pendingfunc) pending. (gdb) break main if (0) Breakpoint 2 at 0x401198: file /home/andrew/tmp/hello.c, line 18. (gdb) info breakpoints Num Type Disp Enb Address What 1 breakpoint keep y <PENDING> pendingfunc stop only if (0) 2 breakpoint keep y 0x0000000000401198 in main at /home/andrew/tmp/hello.c:18 stop only if (0) (gdb) Notice that the display of the condition is now the same for the pending and non-pending breakpoints. The same is true for the thread, inferior, or task information in thread, inferior, or task specific breakpoints; this information is displayed on its own line rather than being part of the 'What' field. 2. We can check that the thread exists as soon as the pending breakpoint is created. Currently there is a weird difference between pending and non-pending breakpoints when creating a thread-specific breakpoint. A pending thread-specific breakpoint only checks its thread when it becomes non-pending, at which point the thread the breakpoint was intended for might have exited. Here's the behaviour before this commit: (gdb) set breakpoint pending on (gdb) break foo thread 2 Function "foo" not defined. Breakpoint 2 (foo thread 2) pending. (gdb) c Continuing. [Thread 0x7ffff7c56700 (LWP 2948835) exited] Error in re-setting breakpoint 2: Unknown thread 2. [Inferior 1 (process 2948832) exited normally] (gdb) Notice the 'Error in re-setting breakpoint 2: Unknown thread 2.' line, this was triggered when GDB tried to make the breakpoint non-pending, and GDB discovers that the thread no longer exists. Compare that to the behaviour after this commit: (gdb) set breakpoint pending on (gdb) break foo thread 2 Function "foo" not defined. Breakpoint 2 (foo) pending. (gdb) c Continuing. [Thread 0x7ffff7c56700 (LWP 2949243) exited] Thread-specific breakpoint 2 deleted - thread 2 no longer in the thread list. [Inferior 1 (process 2949240) exited normally] (gdb) Now the behaviour for pending breakpoints is identical to non-pending breakpoints, the thread specific breakpoint is removed as soon as the thread the breakpoint is associated with exits. There is an additional change; when the pending breakpoint is created prior to this patch we see this line: Breakpoint 2 (foo thread 2) pending. While after this patch we get this line: Breakpoint 2 (foo) pending. Notice that 'thread 2' has disappeared. This might look like a regression, but I don't think it is. That we said 'thread 2' before was just a consequence of the lazy parsing of the breakpoint specification, while with this patch GDB understands, and has parsed away the 'thread 2' bit of the spec. If folk think the old information was useful then this would be trivial to add back in code_breakpoint::say_where. As a result of this commit the breakpoints 'extra_string' field is now only used by bp_dprintf type breakpoints to hold the printf format and arguments. This string should always be empty for other breakpoint types. This allows some cleanup in print_breakpoint_location. In code_breakpoint::code_breakpoint I've changed an error case into an assert. This is because the error is now handled earlier in create_breakpoint. As a result we know that by this point, the extra_string will always be nullptr for anything other than a bp_dprintf style breakpoint. The find_condition_and_thread_for_sals function is now no longer needed, this was previously doing the delayed splitting of the extra string into thread, task, and condition, but this is now all done in create_breakpoint, so find_condition_and_thread_for_sals can be deleted, and the code that calls this in code_breakpoint::location_spec_to_sals can be removed. With this update this code would only ever be reached for bp_dprintf style breakpoints, and in these cases the extra_string should not contain anything other than format and args. The most interesting changes are all in create_breakpoint and in the new file break-cond-parse.c. We have a new block of code early on in create_breakpoint that is responsible for splitting the extra_string into its component parts by calling create_breakpoint_parse_arg_string a function in the new break-cond-parse.c file. This means that some of the later code can be simplified a little. The new break-cond-parse.c file implements the splitting up the extra_string and finding all the parts, as well as some self-tests for the new function. Finally, now we know all the breakpoint details, these can be stored within the breakpoint object if we end up creating a deferred breakpoint. Additionally, if we are creating a deferred bp_dprintf we can parse the extra_string to build the printf command. The implementation here aims to maintain backwards compatibility as much as possible, this means that: 1. We support abbreviations of 'thread', 'task', and 'inferior' in some places on the breakpoint line. The handling of abbreviations has (before this patch) been a little weird, so this works: (gdb) break *main th 1 And creates a breakpoint at '*main' for thread 1 only, while this does not work: (gdb) break main th 1 In this case GDB will try to find the symbol 'main th 1'. This weirdness exists before and after this patch. 2. The handling of '-force-condition' is odd, if this flag appears immediately after a condition then it will be treated as part of the condition, e.g.: (gdb) break main if 0 -force-condition No symbol "force" in current context. But we are fine with these alternatives: (gdb) break main if 0 thread 1 -force-condition (gdb) break main -force-condition if 0 Again, this is just a quirk of how the breakpoint line used to be parsed, but I've maintained this for backward compatibility. During review it was suggested that -force-condition should become an actual breakpoint flag (i.e. only valid after the 'break' command but before the function name), and I don't think that would be a terrible idea, however, that's not currently a trivial change, and I think should be done as a separate piece of work. For now, this patch just maintains the current behaviour. The implementation works by first splitting the breakpoint condition string (everything after the location specification) into a list of tokens, each token has a type and a value. (e.g. we have a THREAD token where the value is the thread-id string). The list of tokens is validated, and in some cases, tokens are merged. Then the values are extracted from the remaining token list. Consider this breakpoint command: (gdb) break main thread 1 if argc == 2 The condition string passed to create_breakpoint_parse_arg_string is going to be 'thread 1 if argc == 2', which is then split into the tokens: { THREAD: "1" } { CONDITION: "argc == 2" } The thread-id (1) and the condition string 'argc == 2' are extracted from these tokens and returns back to create_breakpoint. Now consider this breakpoint command: (gdb) break some_function if ( some_var == thread ) Here the user wants a breakpoint if 'some_var' is equal to the variable 'thread'. However, when this is initially parsed we will find these tokens: { CONDITION: "( some_var == " } { THREAD: ")" } This is a consequence of how we have to try and figure out the contents of the 'if' condition without actually parsing the expression; parsing the expression requires that we know the location in order to lookup the variables by name, and this can't be done for pending breakpoints (their location isn't known yet), and one of the points of this work is that we extract things like thread-id for pending breakpoints. And so, it is in this case that token merging takes place. We check if the value of a token appearing immediately after the CONDITION token looks valid. In this case, does ')' look like a valid thread-id. Clearly, in this case ')' does not, and so me merge the THREAD token into the condition token, giving: { CONDITION: "( some_var == thread )" } Which is what we want. I'm sure that we might still be able to come up with some edge cases where the parser makes the wrong choice. I think long term the best way to work around these would be to move the thread, inferior, task, and -force-condition flags to be "real" command options for the break command. I am looking into doing this, but can't guarantee if/when that work would be completed, so this patch should be reviewed assume that the work will never arrive (though I hope it will). Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
2024-07-31[gdb/testsuite] Fix trailing-text-in-parentheses duplicatesTom de Vries2-6/+6
Fix all trailing-text-in-parentheses duplicates exposed by previous patch. Tested on x86_64-linux and aarch64-linux.
2024-07-20gdb: don't display inferior list for pending breakpointsAndrew Burgess3-0/+214
I noticed that in the 'info breakpoints' output, GDB sometimes prints the inferior list for pending breakpoints, this doesn't seem right to me. A pending breakpoint has no locations (at least, as far as we display things in the 'info breakpoints' output), so including an inferior list seems odd. Here's what I see right now: (gdb) info breakpoint 5 Num Type Disp Enb Address What 5 breakpoint keep y <PENDING> foo inf 1 (gdb) It's the 'inf 1' at the end of the line that I'm objecting too. To trigger this behaviour we need to be in a multi-inferior debug session. The breakpoint must have been non-pending at some point in the past, and so have a location assigned to it. The breakpoint becomes pending again as a result of a shared library being unloaded. When this happens the location itself is marked pending (via bp_location::shlib_disabled). In print_one_breakpoint_location, in order to print the inferior list we check that the breakpoint has a location, and that we have multiple inferiors, but we don't check if the location itself is pending. This commit adds that check, which means the output is now: (gdb) info breakpoint 5 Num Type Disp Enb Address What 5 breakpoint keep y <PENDING> foo (gdb) Which I think makes more sense -- indeed, the format without the inferior list is what we display for a pending breakpoint that has never had any locations assigned, so I think this change in behaviour makes GDB more consistent.
2024-05-06[gdb/testsuite] Handle ptrace operation not permitted in can_spawn_for_attachTom de Vries1-1/+1
When running the testsuite on a system with kernel.yama.ptrace_scope set to 1, we run into attach failures. Fix this by recognizing "ptrace: Operation not permitted" in can_spawn_for_attach. Tested on aarch64-linux and x86_64-linux. Approved-By: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
2024-04-26gdb_is_target_native -> gdb_protocol_is_nativePedro Alves1-8/+8
gdb_is_target_native uses "maint print target-stack", which is unnecessary when checking whether gdb_protocol is empty would do. Checking gdb_protocol is more efficient, and can be done before starting GDB and running to main, unlike gdb_is_target_native. This adds a new gdb_protocol_is_native procedure, and uses it in place of gdb_is_target_native. At first, I thought that we'd end up with a few testcases needing to use gdb_is_target_native still, especially multi-target tests that connect to targets different from the default board target, but no, actually all uses of gdb_is_target_native could be converted. gdb_is_target_native will be eliminated in a following patch. In some spots, we no longer need to defer the check until after starting GDB, so the patch adjusts accordingly. Change-Id: Ia706232dbffac70f9d9740bcb89c609dbee5cee3 Approved-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2024-03-25[gdb/testsuite] Fix tdlabel_re referencesTom de Vries1-1/+1
Commit 467a34bb9e6 ("gdb tests: Allow for "LWP" or "process" in thread IDs from info threads") introduces a new global variable tdlabel_re, but fails to indicate it's global when used in procs in four test-cases. Fix this by adding "global tdlabel_re". Tested on aarch64-linux.
2024-03-22gdb tests: Allow for "LWP" or "process" in thread IDs from info threadsJohn Baldwin1-1/+1
Several tests assume that the first word after a thread ID in 'info threads' output is "Thread". However, several targets use "LWP" instead such as the FreeBSD and NetBSD native targets. The Linux native target also uses "LWP" if libthread_db is not being used. Targets that do not support threads use "process" as the first word via normal_pid_to_str. Add a tdlabel_re global variable as a regular-expression for a thread label in `info threads' that matches either "process", "Thread", or "LWP". Some other tests in the tree don't require a specific word, and some targets may use other first words (e.g. OpenBSD uses "thread" and Ravenscar threads use "Ravenscar Thread").
2024-02-26gdb: Modify the output of "info breakpoints" and "delete breakpoints"Tiezhu Yang1-1/+1
The output of "info breakpoints" includes breakpoint, watchpoint, tracepoint, and catchpoint if they are created, so it should show all the four types are deleted in the output of "info breakpoints" to report empty list after "delete breakpoints". It should also change the output of "delete breakpoints" to make it clear that watchpoints, tracepoints, and catchpoints are also being deleted. This is suggested by Guinevere Larsen, thank you. $ make check-gdb TESTS="gdb.base/access-mem-running.exp" $ gdb/gdb gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.base/access-mem-running/access-mem-running [...] (gdb) break main Breakpoint 1 at 0x12000073c: file /home/loongson/gdb.git/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/access-mem-running.c, line 32. (gdb) watch global_counter Hardware watchpoint 2: global_counter (gdb) trace maybe_stop_here Tracepoint 3 at 0x12000071c: file /home/loongson/gdb.git/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/access-mem-running.c, line 27. (gdb) catch fork Catchpoint 4 (fork) (gdb) info breakpoints Num Type Disp Enb Address What 1 breakpoint keep y 0x000000012000073c in main at /home/loongson/gdb.git/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/access-mem-running.c:32 2 hw watchpoint keep y global_counter 3 tracepoint keep y 0x000000012000071c in maybe_stop_here at /home/loongson/gdb.git/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/access-mem-running.c:27 not installed on target 4 catchpoint keep y fork Without this patch: (gdb) delete breakpoints Delete all breakpoints? (y or n) y (gdb) info breakpoints No breakpoints or watchpoints. (gdb) info breakpoints 3 No breakpoint or watchpoint matching '3'. With this patch: (gdb) delete breakpoints Delete all breakpoints, watchpoints, tracepoints, and catchpoints? (y or n) y (gdb) info breakpoints No breakpoints, watchpoints, tracepoints, or catchpoints. (gdb) info breakpoints 3 No breakpoint, watchpoint, tracepoint, or catchpoint matching '3'. Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> Approved-by: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com> Reviewed-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
2024-01-15gdb/testsuite: remove spurious $ in save_varsSimon Marchi1-1/+1
I noticed that running the whole testsuite in serial mode (which means all the .exp files are ran in the same TCL environment, one after the other) with the native-extended-gdbserver board caused some weird failures, for instance a lot of internal errors in the reverse tests, like: continue^M Continuing.^M /home/jenkins/workspace/binutils-gdb_master_linuxbuild/platform/deb12-amd64/target_board/native-extended-gdbserver/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/remot e.c:6922: internal-error: resume: Assertion `scope_ptid == inferior_ptid' failed.^M A problem internal to GDB has been detected,^M further debugging may prove unreliable.^M ----- Backtrace -----^M FAIL: gdb.reverse/break-precsave.exp: run to end of main (GDB internal error) This only happens after running gdb.multi/attach-while-running.exp. That test does not restore GDBFLAGS properly when it's done, it leaves `-ex \"maint set target-non-stop on\""` in there, which breaks some subsequent tests. The problem is that this line: save_vars { $::GDBFLAGS } { should not use a `$` before the variable name. Passes the content of `::GDBFLAGS` to save_vars, which is not what we want. We want to pass the `::GDBFLAGS` string. Fix that. Change-Id: I5ad32c527795fd10d0d94020e4fd15cebaca3a77
2024-01-12Update copyright year range in header of all files managed by GDBAndrew Burgess59-59/+59
This commit is the result of the following actions: - Running gdb/copyright.py to update all of the copyright headers to include 2024, - Manually updating a few files the copyright.py script told me to update, these files had copyright headers embedded within the file, - Regenerating gdbsupport/Makefile.in to refresh it's copyright date, - Using grep to find other files that still mentioned 2023. If these files were updated last year from 2022 to 2023 then I've updated them this year to 2024. I'm sure I've probably missed some dates. Feel free to fix them up as you spot them.
2023-08-17gdb: add inferior-specific breakpointsAndrew Burgess3-0/+283
This commit extends the breakpoint mechanism to allow for inferior specific breakpoints (but not watchpoints in this commit). As GDB gains better support for multiple connections, and so for running multiple (possibly unrelated) inferiors, then it is not hard to imagine that a user might wish to create breakpoints that apply to any thread in a single inferior. To achieve this currently, the user would need to create a condition possibly making use of the $_inferior convenience variable, which, though functional, isn't the most user friendly. This commit adds a new 'inferior' keyword that allows for the creation of inferior specific breakpoints. Inferior specific breakpoints are automatically deleted when the associated inferior is removed from GDB, this is similar to how thread-specific breakpoints are deleted when the associated thread is deleted. Watchpoints are already per-program-space, which in most cases mean watchpoints are already inferior specific. There is a small window where inferior-specific watchpoints might make sense, which is after a vfork, when two processes are sharing the same address space. However, I'm leaving that as an exercise for another day. For now, attempting to use the inferior keyword with a watchpoint will give an error, like this: (gdb) watch a8 inferior 1 Cannot use 'inferior' keyword with watchpoints A final note on the implementation: currently, inferior specific breakpoints, like thread-specific breakpoints, are inserted into every inferior, GDB then checks once the inferior stops if we are in the correct thread or inferior, and resumes automatically if we stopped in the wrong thread/inferior. An obvious optimisation here is to only insert breakpoint locations into the specific program space (which mostly means inferior) that contains either the inferior or thread we are interested in. This would reduce the number times GDB has to stop and then resume again in a multi-inferior setup. I have a series on the mailing list[1] that implements this optimisation for thread-specific breakpoints. Once this series has landed I'll update that series to also handle inferior specific breakpoints in the same way. For now, inferior specific breakpoints are just slightly less optimal, but this is no different to thread-specific breakpoints in a multi-inferior debug session, so I don't see this as a huge problem. [1] https://inbox.sourceware.org/gdb-patches/cover.1685479504.git.aburgess@redhat.com/
2023-06-03[gdb] Fix typosTom de Vries1-1/+1
Fix a few typos: - implemention -> implementation - convertion(s) -> conversion(s) - backlashes -> backslashes - signoring -> ignoring - (un)ambigious -> (un)ambiguous - occured -> occurred - hidding -> hiding - temporarilly -> temporarily - immediatelly -> immediately - sillyness -> silliness - similiar -> similar - porkuser -> pokeuser - thats -> that - alway -> always - supercede -> supersede - accomodate -> accommodate - aquire -> acquire - priveleged -> privileged - priviliged -> privileged - priviledges -> privileges - privilige -> privilege - recieve -> receive - (p)refered -> (p)referred - succesfully -> successfully - successfuly -> successfully - responsability -> responsibility - wether -> whether - wich -> which - disasbleable -> disableable - descriminant -> discriminant - construcstor -> constructor - underlaying -> underlying - underyling -> underlying - structureal -> structural - appearences -> appearances - terciarily -> tertiarily - resgisters -> registers - reacheable -> reachable - likelyhood -> likelihood - intepreter -> interpreter - disassemly -> disassembly - covnersion -> conversion - conviently -> conveniently - atttribute -> attribute - struction -> struct - resonable -> reasonable - popupated -> populated - namespaxe -> namespace - intialize -> initialize - identifer(s) -> identifier(s) - expection -> exception - exectuted -> executed - dungerous -> dangerous - dissapear -> disappear - completly -> completely - (inter)changable -> (inter)changeable - beakpoint -> breakpoint - automativ -> automatic - alocating -> allocating - agressive -> aggressive - writting -> writing - reguires -> requires - registed -> registered - recuding -> reducing - opeartor -> operator - ommitted -> omitted - modifing -> modifying - intances -> instances - imbedded -> embedded - gdbaarch -> gdbarch - exection -> execution - direcive -> directive - demanged -> demangled - decidely -> decidedly - argments -> arguments - agrument -> argument - amespace -> namespace - targtet -> target - supress(ed) -> suppress(ed) - startum -> stratum - squence -> sequence - prompty -> prompt - overlow -> overflow - memember -> member - languge -> language - geneate -> generate - funcion -> function - exising -> existing - dinking -> syncing - destroh -> destroy - clenaed -> cleaned - changep -> changedp (name of variable) - arround -> around - aproach -> approach - whould -> would - symobl -> symbol - recuse -> recurse - outter -> outer - freeds -> frees - contex -> context Tested on x86_64-linux. Reviewed-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2023-04-28gdb: make set/show inferior-tty work with $_gdb_setting_strAndrew Burgess1-0/+14
Like the previous two commits, this commit fixes set/show inferior-tty to work with $_gdb_setting_str. Instead of using a scratch variable which is then pushed into the current inferior from a set callback, move to the API that allows for getters and setters, and store the value directly within the current inferior. Update an existing test to check the inferior-tty setting. Reviewed-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2023-04-28gdb: make set/show cwd work with $_gdb_setting_strAndrew Burgess1-0/+9
The previous commit fixed set/show args when used with $_gdb_setting_str, this commit fixes set/show cwd. Instead of using a scratch variable which is then pushed into the current inferior from a set callback, move to the API that allows for getters and setters, and store the value directly within the current inferior. Update the existing test to check the cwd setting.
2023-04-28gdb: make set/show args work with $_gdb_setting_strAndrew Burgess2-0/+122
I noticed that $_gdb_setting_str was not working with 'args', e.g.: $ gdb -q --args /tmp/hello.x arg1 arg2 arg3 Reading symbols from /tmp/hello.x... (gdb) show args Argument list to give program being debugged when it is started is "arg1 arg2 arg3". (gdb) print $_gdb_setting_str("args") $1 = "" This is because the 'args' setting is implemented using a scratch variable ('inferior_args_scratch') which is updated when the user does 'set args ...'. There is then a function 'set_args_command' which is responsible for copying the scratch area into the current inferior. However, when the user sets the arguments via the command line the scratch variable is not updated, instead the arguments are pushed straight into the current inferior. There is a second problem, when the current inferior changes the scratch area is not updated, which means that the value returned will only ever reflect the last call to 'set args ...' regardless of which inferior is currently selected. Luckily, the fix is pretty easy, set/show variables have an alternative API which requires we provide some getter and setter functions. With this done the scratch variable can be removed and the value returned will now always reflect the current inferior. While working on set/show args I also rewrote show_args_command to remove the use of deprecated_show_value_hack. Reviewed-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
2023-04-24[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.multi/multi-arch.exp on powerpc64leTom de Vries1-0/+8
When running test-case gdb.multi/multi-arch.exp on powerpc64le-linux, I run into: ... Running gdb/testsuite/gdb.multi/multi-arch.exp ... gdb compile failed, In file included from /usr/include/features.h:399:0, from /usr/include/stdio.h:27, from gdb/testsuite/gdb.multi/hangout.c:18: /usr/include/gnu/stubs.h:8:27: fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: \ No such file or directory # include <gnu/stubs-32.h> ^ compilation terminated. ... The problem is that the test-case attempts to use gcc -m32 to produce an executable while that's not available. Fix this by: - introduce a new caching proc have_compile_and_link_flag, and - using have_compile_and_link_flag in test-case gdb.multi/multi-arch.exp. Tested on: - x86_64-linux (openSUSE Leap 15.4), and - powerpc64le-linux (CentOS-7).
2023-03-20gdb: don't use the global thread-id in the saved breakpoints fileAndrew Burgess1-0/+46
I noticed that breakpoint::print_recreate_thread was printing the global thread-id. This function is used to implement the 'save breakpoints' command, and should be writing out suitable CLI commands for recreating the current breakpoints. The CLI does not use global thread-ids, but instead uses the inferior specific thread-ids, e.g. "2.1". After some discussion on the mailing list it was suggested that the most consistent solution would be for the saved breakpoints file to always contain the inferior-qualified thread-id, so the file would include "thread 1.1" instead of just "thread 1", even when there is only a single inferior. So, this commit adds print_full_thread_id, which is just like the existing print_thread_id, only it always prints the inferior-qualified thread-id. I then update the existing print_thread_id to make use of this new function, and finally, I update breakpoint::print_recreate_thread to also use this new function. There's a multi-inferior test that confirms the saved breakpoints file correctly includes the fully-qualified thread-id, and I've also updated the single inferior test gdb.base/save-bp.exp to have it validate that the saved breakpoints file includes the inferior-qualified thread-id, even for this single inferior case.
2023-02-27gdb: reformat Python files with black 23.1.0Simon Marchi1-0/+1
Change-Id: Ie8ec8870a16d71c5858f5d08958309d23c318302 Reviewed-By: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> Reviewed-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2023-02-11gdb: don't print global thread-id to CLI in describe_other_breakpointsAndrew Burgess2-0/+89
I noticed that describe_other_breakpoints was printing the global thread-id to the CLI. For CLI output we should be printing the inferior local thread-id (e.g. "2.1"). This can be seen in the following GDB session: (gdb) info threads Id Target Id Frame 1.1 Thread 4065742.4065742 "bp-thread-speci" main () at /tmp/bp-thread-specific.c:27 * 2.1 Thread 4065743.4065743 "bp-thread-speci" main () at /tmp/bp-thread-specific.c:27 (gdb) break foo thread 2.1 Breakpoint 3 at 0x40110a: foo. (2 locations) (gdb) break foo thread 1.1 Note: breakpoint 3 (thread 2) also set at pc 0x40110a. Note: breakpoint 3 (thread 2) also set at pc 0x40110a. Breakpoint 4 at 0x40110a: foo. (2 locations) Notice that GDB says: Note: breakpoint 3 (thread 2) also set at pc 0x40110a. The 'thread 2' in here is using the global thread-id, we should instead say 'thread 2.1' which corresponds to how the user specified the breakpoint. This commit fixes this issue and adds a test. Approved-By: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
2023-01-30gdb: Make global feature array a per-remote target arrayChristina Schimpe2-5/+9
This patch applies the appropriate FIXME notes described in commit 5b6d1e4 "Multi-target support". "You'll notice that remote.c includes some FIXME notes. These refer to the fact that the global arrays that hold data for the remote packets supported are still globals. For example, if we connect to two different servers/stubs, then each might support different remote protocol features. They might even be different architectures, like e.g., one ARM baremetal stub, and a x86 gdbserver, to debug a host/controller scenario as a single program. That isn't going to work correctly today, because of said globals. I'm leaving fixing that for another pass, since it does not appear to be trivial, and I'd rather land the base work first. It's already useful to be able to debug multiple instances of the same server (e.g., a distributed cluster, where you have full control over the servers installed), so I think as is it's already reasonable incremental progress." Using this patch it is possible to configure per-remote targets' feature packets. Given the following setup for two gdbservers: ~~~~ gdbserver --multi :1234 gdbserver --disable-packet=vCont --multi :2345 ~~~~ Before this patch configuring of range-stepping was not possible for one of two connected remote targets with different support for the vCont packet. As one of the targets supports vCont, it should be possible to configure "set range-stepping". However, the output of GDB looks like: (gdb) target extended-remote :1234 Remote debugging using :1234 (gdb) add-inferior -no-connection [New inferior 2] Added inferior 2 (gdb) inferior 2 [Switching to inferior 2 [<null>] (<noexec>)] (gdb) target extended-remote :2345 Remote debugging using :2345 (gdb) set range-stepping on warning: Range stepping is not supported by the current target (gdb) inferior 1 [Switching to inferior 1 [<null>] (<noexec>)] (gdb) set range-stepping on warning: Range stepping is not supported by the current target ~~~~ Two warnings are shown. The warning for inferior 1 should not appear as it is connected to a target supporting the vCont package. ~~~~ (gdb) target extended-remote :1234 Remote debugging using :1234 (gdb) add-inferior -no-connection [New inferior 2] Added inferior 2 (gdb) inferior 2 [Switching to inferior 2 [<null>] (<noexec>)] (gdb) target extended-remote :2345 Remote debugging using :2345 (gdb) set range-stepping on warning: Range stepping is not supported by the current target (gdb) inferior 1 [Switching to inferior 1 [<null>] (<noexec>)] (gdb) set range-stepping on (gdb) ~~~~ Now only one warning is shown for inferior 2, which is connected to a target not supporting vCont. The per-remote target feature array is realized by a new class remote_features, which stores the per-remote target array and provides functions to determine supported features of the target. A remote_target object now has a new member of that class. Each time a new remote_target object is initialized, a new per-remote target array is constructed based on the global remote_protocol_packets array. The global array is initialized in the function _initialize_remote and can be configured using the command line. Before this patch the command line configuration affected current targets and future remote targets (due to the global feature array used by all remote targets). This behavior is different and the configuration applies as follows: - If a target is connected, the command line configuration affects the current connection. All other existing remote targets are not affected. - If not connected, the command line configuration affects future connections. The show command displays the current remote target's configuration. If no remote target is selected the default configuration for future connections is shown. If we have for instance the following setup with inferior 2 being selected: ~~~~ (gdb) info inferiors Num Description Connection Executable 1 <null> 1 (extended-remote :1234) * 2 <null> 2 (extended-remote :2345) ~~~~ Before this patch, if we run 'set remote multiprocess-feature-packet', the following configuration was set: The feature array of all remote targets (in this setup the two connected targets) and all future remote connections are affected. After this patch, it will be configured as follows: The feature array of target with port :2345 which is currently selected will be configured. All other existing remote targets are not affected. The show command 'show remote multiprocess-feature-packet' will display the configuration of target with port :2345. Due to this configuration change, it is required to adapt the test "gdb/testsuite/gdb.multi/multi-target-info-inferiors.exp" to configure the multiprocess-feature-packet before the connections are created. To inform the gdb user about the new behaviour of the 'show remote PACKET-NAME' commands and the new configuration impact for remote targets using the 'set remote PACKET-NAME' commands the commands' outputs are adapted. Due to this change it is required to adapt each test using the set/show remote 'PACKET-NAME' commands.
2023-01-26Eliminate spurious returns from the test suiteTom Tromey1-2/+0
A number of tests end with "return". However, this is unnecessary. This patch removes all of these.
2023-01-13Rename to allow_python_testsTom Tromey2-3/+3
This changes skip_python_tests to invert the sense, and renames it to allow_python_tests.
2023-01-13Rename to allow_hw_watchpoint_multi_testsTom Tromey1-1/+1
This changes skip_hw_watchpoint_multi_tests to invert the sense, and renames it to allow_hw_watchpoint_multi_tests.
2023-01-13Rename to allow_hw_watchpoint_access_testsTom Tromey1-1/+1
This changes skip_hw_watchpoint_access_tests to invert the sense, and renames it to allow_hw_watchpoint_access_tests.
2023-01-13Rename to allow_gdbserver_testsTom Tromey2-2/+2
This changes skip_gdbserver_tests to invert the sense, and renames it to allow_gdbserver_tests.
2023-01-13Use require target_can_use_run_cmdTom Tromey1-3/+1
This changes some tests to use "require target_can_use_run_cmd".
2023-01-13Use require !skip_gdbserver_testsTom Tromey1-3/+1
This changes some tests to use "require !skip_gdbserver_tests".
2023-01-13Use require can_spawn_for_attachTom Tromey3-9/+3
This changes some tests to use "require can_spawn_for_attach".
2023-01-13Use require !use_gdb_stubTom Tromey11-37/+11
This changes some tests to use "require !use_gdb_stub".
2023-01-13Use require !skip_hw_watchpoint_testsTom Tromey1-4/+1
This changes some tests to use "require !skip_hw_watchpoint_tests".
2023-01-01Update copyright year range in header of all files managed by GDBJoel Brobecker52-52/+52
This commit is the result of running the gdb/copyright.py script, which automated the update of the copyright year range for all source files managed by the GDB project to be updated to include year 2023.
2022-11-28gdb/testsuite: remove use of then keyword from gdb.multi/*.expAndrew Burgess9-18/+18
The canonical form of 'if' in modern TCL is 'if {} {}'. But there's still a bunch of places in the testsuite where we make use of the 'then' keyword, and sometimes these get copies into new tests, which just spreads poor practice. This commit removes all use of the 'then' keyword from the gdb.multi/ test script directory. There should be no changes in what is tested after this commit.
2022-11-28gdbserver: switch to right process in find_one_threadSimon Marchi2-0/+95
New in this version: add a dedicated test. When I do this: $ ./gdb -nx --data-directory=data-directory -q \ /bin/sleep \ -ex "maint set target-non-stop on" \ -ex "tar ext :1234" \ -ex "set remote exec-file /bin/sleep" \ -ex "run 1231 &" \ -ex add-inferior \ -ex "inferior 2" Reading symbols from /bin/sleep... (No debugging symbols found in /bin/sleep) Remote debugging using :1234 Starting program: /bin/sleep 1231 Reading /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 from remote target... warning: File transfers from remote targets can be slow. Use "set sysroot" to access files locally instead. Reading /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 from remote target... Reading /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/a6/7a1408f18db3576757eea210d07ba3fc560dff.debug from remote target... [New inferior 2] Added inferior 2 on connection 1 (extended-remote :1234) [Switching to inferior 2 [<null>] (<noexec>)] (gdb) Reading /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 from remote target... attach 3659848 Attaching to process 3659848 /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/thread.c:85: internal-error: inferior_thread: Assertion `current_thread_ != nullptr' failed. Note the "attach" command just above. When doing it on the command-line with a -ex switch, the bug doesn't trigger. The internal error of GDB is actually caused by GDBserver crashing, and the error recovery of GDB is not on point. This patch aims to fix just the GDBserver crash, not the GDB problem. GDBserver crashes with a segfault here: (gdb) bt #0 0x00005555557fb3f4 in find_one_thread (ptid=...) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/thread-db.cc:177 #1 0x00005555557fd5cf in thread_db_thread_handle (ptid=<error reading variable: Cannot access memory at address 0xffffffffffffffa0>, handle=0x7fffffffc400, handle_len=0x7fffffffc3f0) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/thread-db.cc:461 #2 0x000055555578a0b6 in linux_process_target::thread_handle (this=0x5555558a64c0 <the_x86_target>, ptid=<error reading variable: Cannot access memory at address 0xffffffffffffffa0>, handle=0x7fffffffc400, handle_len=0x7fffffffc3f0) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/linux-low.cc:6905 #3 0x00005555556dfcc6 in handle_qxfer_threads_worker (thread=0x60b000000510, buffer=0x7fffffffc8a0) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:1645 #4 0x00005555556e00e6 in operator() (__closure=0x7fffffffc5e0, thread=0x60b000000510) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:1696 #5 0x00005555556f54be in for_each_thread<handle_qxfer_threads_proper(buffer*)::<lambda(thread_info*)> >(struct {...}) (func=...) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/gdbthread.h:159 #6 0x00005555556e0242 in handle_qxfer_threads_proper (buffer=0x7fffffffc8a0) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:1694 #7 0x00005555556e04ba in handle_qxfer_threads (annex=0x629000000213 "", readbuf=0x621000019100 '\276' <repeats 200 times>..., writebuf=0x0, offset=0, len=4097) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:1732 #8 0x00005555556e1989 in handle_qxfer (own_buf=0x629000000200 "qXfer:threads", packet_len=26, new_packet_len_p=0x7fffffffd630) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:2045 #9 0x00005555556e720a in handle_query (own_buf=0x629000000200 "qXfer:threads", packet_len=26, new_packet_len_p=0x7fffffffd630) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:2685 #10 0x00005555556f1a01 in process_serial_event () at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:4176 #11 0x00005555556f4457 in handle_serial_event (err=0, client_data=0x0) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:4514 #12 0x0000555555820f56 in handle_file_event (file_ptr=0x607000000250, ready_mask=1) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbsupport/event-loop.cc:573 #13 0x0000555555821895 in gdb_wait_for_event (block=1) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbsupport/event-loop.cc:694 #14 0x000055555581f533 in gdb_do_one_event (mstimeout=-1) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbsupport/event-loop.cc:264 #15 0x00005555556ec9fb in start_event_loop () at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:3512 #16 0x00005555556f0769 in captured_main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe0d8) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:3992 #17 0x00005555556f0e3f in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fffffffe0d8) at /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdbserver/server.cc:4078 The reason is a wrong current process when find_one_thread is called. The current process is the 2nd one, which was just attached. It does not yet have thread_db data (proc->priv->thread_db is nullptr). As we iterate on all threads of all process to fulfull the qxfer:threads:read request, we get to a thread of process 1 for which we haven't read thread_db information yet (lwp_info::thread_known is false), so we get into find_one_thread. find_one_thread uses `current_process ()->priv->thread_db`, assuming the current process matches the ptid passed as a parameter, which is wrong. A segfault happens when trying to dereference that thread_db pointer. Fix this by making find_one_thread not assume what the current process / current thread is. If it needs to call into libthread_db, which we know will try to read memory from the current process, then temporarily set the current process. In the case where the thread is already know and we return early, we don't need to switch process. Add a test to reproduce this specific situation. Change-Id: I09b00883e8b73b7e5f89d0f47cb4e9c0f3d6caaa Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
2022-11-19Show locno for 'multi location' breakpoint hit msg+conv var $_hit_bbnum ↵Philippe Waroquiers4-6/+7
$_hit_locno PR breakpoints/12464 This implements the request given in PR breakpoints/12464. Before this patch, when a breakpoint that has multiple locations is reached, GDB printed: Thread 1 "zeoes" hit Breakpoint 1, some_func () at somefunc1.c:5 This patch changes the message so that bkpt_print_id prints the precise encountered breakpoint: Thread 1 "zeoes" hit Breakpoint 1.2, some_func () at somefunc1.c:5 In mi mode, bkpt_print_id also (optionally) prints a new table field "locno": locno is printed when the breakpoint hit has more than one location. Note that according to the GDB user manual node 'GDB/MI Development and Front Ends', it is ok to add new fields without changing the MI version. Also, when a breakpoint is reached, the convenience variables $_hit_bpnum and $_hit_locno are set to the encountered breakpoint number and location number. $_hit_bpnum and $_hit_locno can a.o. be used in the command list of a breakpoint, to disable the specific encountered breakpoint, e.g. disable $_hit_bpnum.$_hit_locno In case the breakpoint has only one location, $_hit_locno is set to the value 1, so as to allow a command such as: disable $_hit_bpnum.$_hit_locno to disable the breakpoint even when the breakpoint has only one location. This also fixes a strange behaviour: when a breakpoint X has only one location, enable|disable X.1 is accepted but transforms the breakpoint in a multiple locations breakpoint having only one location. The changes in RFA v4 handle the comments of Tom Tromey: - Changed convenience var names from $bkptno/$locno to $_hit_bpnum/$_hit_locno. - updated the tests and user manual accordingly. User manual also explictly describes that $_hit_locno is set to 1 for a breakpoint with a single location. - The variable values are now set in bpstat_do_actions_1 so that they are set for silent breakpoints, and when several breakpoints are hit at the same time, that the variables are set to the printed breakpoint. The changes in RFA v3 handle the additional comments of Eli: GDB/NEW: - Use max 80-column - Use 'code location' instead of 'location'. - Fix typo $bkpno - Ensure that disable $bkptno and disable $bkptno.$locno have each their explanation inthe example - Reworded the 'breakpoint-hit' paragraph. gdb.texinfo: - Use 'code location' instead of 'location'. - Add a note to clarify the distinction between $bkptno and $bpnum. - Use @kbd instead of examples with only one command. Compared to RFA v1, the changes in v2 handle the comments given by Keith Seitz and Eli Zaretskii: - Use %s for the result of paddress - Use bkptno_numopt_re instead of 2 different -re cases - use C@t{++} - Add index entries for $bkptno and $locno - Added an example for "locno" in the mi interface - Added examples in the Break command manual.
2022-11-17gdb: new $_inferior_thread_count convenience variableAndrew Burgess1-0/+20
Add a new convenience variable $_inferior_thread_count that contains the number of live (non-exited) threads in the current inferior. This can be used in command scripts, or breakpoint conditions, etc to adjust the behaviour for multi-threaded inferiors. This value is only stable in all-stop mode. In non-stop mode, where new threads can be started, and existing threads exit, at any time, this convenience variable can give a different value each time it is evaluated.
2022-11-10gdb: make "start" breakpoint inferior-specificSimon Marchi3-0/+126
I saw this failure on a CI: (gdb) add-inferior [New inferior 2] Added inferior 2 (gdb) PASS: gdb.threads/vfork-multi-inferior.exp: method=non-stop: add-inferior inferior 2 [Switching to inferior 2 [<null>] (<noexec>)] (gdb) PASS: gdb.threads/vfork-multi-inferior.exp: method=non-stop: inferior 2 kill The program is not being run. (gdb) file /home/jenkins/workspace/binutils-gdb_master_linuxbuild/platform/jammy-amd64/target_board/unix/tmp/tmp.GYATAXR8Ku/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.threads/vfork-multi-inferior/vfork-multi-inferior-sleep Reading symbols from /home/jenkins/workspace/binutils-gdb_master_linuxbuild/platform/jammy-amd64/target_board/unix/tmp/tmp.GYATAXR8Ku/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.threads/vfork-multi-inferior/vfork-multi-inferior-sleep... (gdb) run & Starting program: /home/jenkins/workspace/binutils-gdb_master_linuxbuild/platform/jammy-amd64/target_board/unix/tmp/tmp.GYATAXR8Ku/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.threads/vfork-multi-inferior/vfork-multi-inferior-sleep (gdb) PASS: gdb.threads/vfork-multi-inferior.exp: method=non-stop: run inferior 2 inferior 1 [Switching to inferior 1 [<null>] (<noexec>)] (gdb) PASS: gdb.threads/vfork-multi-inferior.exp: method=non-stop: inferior 1 kill The program is not being run. (gdb) file /home/jenkins/workspace/binutils-gdb_master_linuxbuild/platform/jammy-amd64/target_board/unix/tmp/tmp.GYATAXR8Ku/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.threads/vfork-multi-inferior/vfork-multi-inferior Reading symbols from /home/jenkins/workspace/binutils-gdb_master_linuxbuild/platform/jammy-amd64/target_board/unix/tmp/tmp.GYATAXR8Ku/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.threads/vfork-multi-inferior/vfork-multi-inferior... (gdb) break should_break_here Breakpoint 1 at 0x11b1: file /home/jenkins/workspace/binutils-gdb_master_linuxbuild/platform/jammy-amd64/target_board/unix/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/vfork-multi-inferior.c, line 25. (gdb) PASS: gdb.threads/vfork-multi-inferior.exp: method=non-stop: break should_break_here [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". start Temporary breakpoint 2 at 0x11c0: -qualified main. (2 locations) Starting program: /home/jenkins/workspace/binutils-gdb_master_linuxbuild/platform/jammy-amd64/target_board/unix/tmp/tmp.GYATAXR8Ku/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.threads/vfork-multi-inferior/vfork-multi-inferior [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". Thread 2.1 "vfork-multi-inf" hit Temporary breakpoint 2, main () at /home/jenkins/workspace/binutils-gdb_master_linuxbuild/platform/jammy-amd64/target_board/unix/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/testsuite/gdb.threads/vfork-multi-inferior-sleep.c:23 23 sleep (30); (gdb) FAIL: gdb.threads/vfork-multi-inferior.exp: method=non-stop: start inferior 1 What happens is: 1. We start inferior 2 with "run&", it runs very slowly, takes time to get to main 2. We switch to inferior 1, and run "start" 3. The temporary breakpoint inserted by "start" applies to all inferiors 4. Inferior 2 hits that breakpoint and GDB reports that hit To avoid this, breakpoints inserted by "start" should be inferior-specific. However, we don't have a nice way to make inferior-specific breakpoints yet. It's possible to make pspace-specific breakpoints (for example how the internal_breakpoint constructor does) by creating a symtab_and_line manually. However, inferiors can share program spaces (usually on particular embedded targets), so we could have a situation where two inferiors run the same code in the same program space. In that case, it would just not be possible to insert a breakpoint in one inferior but not the other. A simple solution that should work all the time is to add a condition to the breakpoint inserted by "start", to check the inferior reporting the hit is the expected one. This is what this patch implements. Add a test that does: - start in background inferior 1 that sleeps before reaching its main function (using a sleep in a global C++ object's constructor) - start inferior 2 with the "start" command, which also sleeps before reaching its main function - validate that we hit the breakpoint in inferior 2 Without the fix, we hit the breakpoint in inferior 1 pretty much all the time. There could be some unfortunate scheduling causing the test not to catch the bug, for instance if the scheduler decides not to schedule inferior 1 for a long time, but it would be really rare. If the bug is re-introduced, the test will catch it much more often than not, so it will be noticed. Reviewed-By: Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com> Approved-By: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net> Change-Id: Ib0148498a476bfa634ed62353c95f163623c686a
2022-10-25[gdb/testsuite] Add missing skip_gdbserver_tests in ↵Tom de Vries1-0/+4
gdb.multi/attach-no-multi-process.exp I build gdb without gdbserver, and ran into: ... (gdb) PASS: gdb.multi/attach-no-multi-process.exp: target_non_stop=off: \ switch to inferior 2 spawn of --once --multi localhost:2346 failed ERROR: tcl error sourcing attach-no-multi-process.exp. ERROR: tcl error code NONE ERROR: Timeout waiting for gdbserver response. ... Add the missing skip_gdbserver_tests. Tested on x86_64-linux.
2022-06-08aarch64: Add fallback if ARM_CC_FOR_TARGET not setPedro Alves2-4/+4
On Aarch64, you can set ARM_CC_FOR_TARGET to point to the 32-bit compiler to use when testing gdb.multi/multi-arch.exp and gdb.multi/multi-arch-exec.exp. If you don't set it, then those testcases don't run. I guess that approximately nobody remembers to set ARM_CC_FOR_TARGET. This commit adds a fallback. If ARM_CC_FOR_TARGET is not set, and testing for Linux, try arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc, arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc, arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc as 32-bit compilers, making sure that the produced executable runs on the target machine before claiming that the compiler produces useful executables. Change-Id: Iefe5865d5fc84b4032eaff7f4c5c61582bf75c39
2022-05-17Remove gdb_test questions that GDB doesn't askPedro Alves1-1/+1
Change-Id: Ib2616dc883e9dc9ee100f6c86d83a921a0113c16
2022-05-16gdb/testsuite: fix "continue outside of loop" TCL errorsBruno Larsen1-2/+2
Many test cases had a few lines in the beginning that look like: if { condition } { continue } Where conditions varied, but were mostly in the form of ![runto_main] or [skip_*_tests], making it quite clear that this code block was supposed to finish the test if it entered the code block. This generates TCL errors, as most of these tests are not inside loops. All cases on which this was an obvious mistake are changed in this patch.