| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
This updates the copyright headers to include 2025. I did this by
running gdb/copyright.py and then manually modifying a few files as
noted by the script.
Approved-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
|
|
This commit is the result of the following actions:
- Running gdb/copyright.py to update all of the copyright headers to
include 2024,
- Manually updating a few files the copyright.py script told me to
update, these files had copyright headers embedded within the
file,
- Regenerating gdbsupport/Makefile.in to refresh it's copyright
date,
- Using grep to find other files that still mentioned 2023. If
these files were updated last year from 2022 to 2023 then I've
updated them this year to 2024.
I'm sure I've probably missed some dates. Feel free to fix them up as
you spot them.
|
|
This changes skip_fortran_tests to invert the sense, and renames it to
allow_fortran_tests.
|
|
This changes some tests to use "require !skip_fortran_tests".
|
|
This commit is the result of running the gdb/copyright.py script,
which automated the update of the copyright year range for all
source files managed by the GDB project to be updated to include
year 2023.
|
|
This commit brings all the changes made by running gdb/copyright.py
as per GDB's Start of New Year Procedure.
For the avoidance of doubt, all changes in this commits were
performed by the script.
|
|
When running test-case gdb.fortran/call-no-debug.exp with target board
native-gdbserver, I run into:
...
(gdb) PASS: gdb.fortran/call-no-debug.exp: print string_func_ (&'abcdefg', 3)
call (integer) string_func_ (&'abcdefg', 3)^M
$2 = 0^M
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.fortran/call-no-debug.exp: call (integer) string_func_ (&'abcdefg', 3)
...
The problem is that gdb_test is used to match inferior output.
Fix this by using gdb_test_stdio.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
|
|
As follow-up to this discussion:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2020-August/171385.html
... make runto_main not pass no-message to runto. This means that if we
fail to run to main, for some reason, we'll emit a FAIL. This is the
behavior we want the majority of (if not all) the time.
Without this, we rely on tests logging a failure if runto_main fails,
otherwise. They do so in a very inconsisteny mannet, sometimes using
"fail", "unsupported" or "untested". The messages also vary widly.
This patch removes all these messages as well.
Also, remove a few "fail" where we call runto (and not runto_main). by
default (without an explicit no-message argument), runto prints a
failure already. In two places, gdb.multi/multi-re-run.exp and
gdb.python/py-pp-registration.exp, remove "message" passed to runto.
This removes a few PASSes that we don't care about (but FAILs will still
be printed if we fail to run to where we want to). This aligns their
behavior with the rest of the testsuite.
Change-Id: Ib763c98c5f4fb6898886b635210d7c34bd4b9023
|
|
On openSUSE Tumbleweed I ran into:
...
(gdb) ptype outstring_func.part^M
No symbol "outstring_func" in current context.^M
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.fortran/call-no-debug.exp: ptype outstring_func.part
...
while on openSUSE Leap 15.2 I have instead:
...
(gdb) ptype string_func_^M
type = <unknown return type> ()^M
(gdb) PASS: gdb.fortran/call-no-debug.exp: ptype string_func_
...
The difference is caused by the result for "info function string_func", which
is this for the latter:
...
(gdb) info function string_func^M
All functions matching regular expression "string_func":^M
^M
Non-debugging symbols:^M
0x000000000040089c string_func_^M
...
but this for the former:
...
(gdb) info function string_func^M
All functions matching regular expression "string_func":^M
^M
Non-debugging symbols:^M
0x00000000004012bb string_func_^M
0x00007ffff7bac5b0 outstring_func.part^M
0x00007ffff7bb1a00 outstring_func.part^M
...
The extra symbols are part of glibc:
...
$ nm /lib64/libc.so.6 | grep string_func
00000000000695b0 t outstring_func.part.0
000000000006ea00 t outstring_func.part.0
...
If glibc debug info is installed, we get instead:
...
(gdb) info function string_func^M
All functions matching regular expression "string_func":^M
^M
File /usr/src/debug/glibc-2.33-9.1.x86_64/stdio-common/vfprintf-internal.c:^M
236: static int outstring_func(int, size_t, const unsigned int *, FILE *);^M
^M
File vfprintf-internal.c:^M
236: static int outstring_func(int, size_t, const unsigned char *, FILE *);^M
^M
Non-debugging symbols:^M
0x00000000004012bb string_func_^M
...
and the FAIL doesn't trigger.
Fix this by calling "info function string_func" before starting the exec, such
that only symbols of the exec are taken into account.
Tested on x86_64-linux.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2021-09-01 Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
* gdb.fortran/call-no-debug.exp: Avoid shared lib symbols for
find_mangled_name calls.
|
|
When attempting to call a Fortran function for which there is no debug
information we currently trigger undefined behaviour in GDB by
accessing non-existent type fields.
The reason is that in order to prepare the arguments, for a call to a
Fortran function, we need to know the type of each argument. If the
function being called has no debug information then obviously GDB
doesn't know about the argument types and we should either give the
user an error or pick a suitable default. What we currently do is
just assume the field exist and access undefined memory, which is
clearly wrong.
The reason GDB needs to know the argument type is to tell if the
argument is artificial or not, artificial arguments will be passed by
value while non-artificial arguments will be passed by reference.
An ideal solution for this problem would be to allow the user to cast
the function to the correct type, we already do this to some degree
with the return value, for example:
(gdb) print some_func_ ()
'some_func_' has unknown return type; cast the call to its declared return type
(gdb) print (integer) some_func_ ()
$1 = 1
But if we could extend this to allow casting to the full function
type, GDB could figure out from the signature what are real
parameters, and what are artificial parameters. Maybe something like
this:
(gdb) print ((integer () (integer, double)) some_other_func_ (1, 2.3)
Alas, right now the Fortran expression parser doesn't seem to support
parsing function signatures, and we certainly don't have support for
figuring out real vs artificial arguments from a signature.
Still, I think we can prevent GDB from accessing undefined memory and
provide a reasonable default behaviour.
In this commit I:
- Only ask if the argument is artificial if the type of the argument
is actually known.
- Unknown arguments are assumed to be artificial and passed by
value (non-artificial arguments are pass by reference).
- If an artificial argument is prefixed with '&' by the user then we
treat the argument as pass-by-reference.
With these three changes we avoid undefined behaviour in GDB, and
allow the user, in most cases, to get a reasonably natural default
behaviour.
gdb/ChangeLog:
PR fortran/26155
* f-lang.c (fortran_argument_convert): Delete declaration.
(fortran_prepare_argument): New function.
(evaluate_subexp_f): Move logic to new function
fortran_prepare_argument.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR fortran/26155
* gdb.fortran/call-no-debug-func.f90: New file.
* gdb.fortran/call-no-debug-prog.f90: New file.
* gdb.fortran/call-no-debug.exp: New file.
|
