| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
This updates the copyright headers to include 2025. I did this by
running gdb/copyright.py and then manually modifying a few files as
noted by the script.
Approved-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
|
|
This commit is the result of the following actions:
- Running gdb/copyright.py to update all of the copyright headers to
include 2024,
- Manually updating a few files the copyright.py script told me to
update, these files had copyright headers embedded within the
file,
- Regenerating gdbsupport/Makefile.in to refresh it's copyright
date,
- Using grep to find other files that still mentioned 2023. If
these files were updated last year from 2022 to 2023 then I've
updated them this year to 2024.
I'm sure I've probably missed some dates. Feel free to fix them up as
you spot them.
|
|
This commit is the result of running the gdb/copyright.py script,
which automated the update of the copyright year range for all
source files managed by the GDB project to be updated to include
year 2023.
|
|
This commit brings all the changes made by running gdb/copyright.py
as per GDB's Start of New Year Procedure.
For the avoidance of doubt, all changes in this commits were
performed by the script.
|
|
This commits the result of running gdb/copyright.py as per our Start
of New Year procedure...
gdb/ChangeLog
Update copyright year range in copyright header of all GDB files.
|
|
gdb/ChangeLog:
Update copyright year range in all GDB files.
|
|
This commit applies all changes made after running the gdb/copyright.py
script.
Note that one file was flagged by the script, due to an invalid
copyright header
(gdb/unittests/basic_string_view/element_access/char/empty.cc).
As the file was copied from GCC's libstdc++-v3 testsuite, this commit
leaves this file untouched for the time being; a patch to fix the header
was sent to gcc-patches first.
gdb/ChangeLog:
Update copyright year range in all GDB files.
|
|
gdb/ChangeLog:
Update copyright year range in all GDB files
|
|
This applies the second part of GDB's End of Year Procedure, which
updates the copyright year range in all of GDB's files.
gdb/ChangeLog:
Update copyright year range in all GDB files.
|
|
PR19548 shows that we still have problems related to 13fd3ff34329:
[PR17431: following execs with "breakpoint always-inserted on"]
https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-09/msg00733.html
The problem this time is that we currently update the global location
list and try to insert breakpoint locations after re-setting _each_
breakpoint in turn.
Say:
- We have _more_ than one breakpoint set. Let's assume 2.
- There's a breakpoint with a pre-exec address that ends up being an
unmapped address after the exec.
- That breakpoint is NOT the first in the breakpoint list.
Then when handling an exec, and we re-set the first breakpoint in the
breakpoint list, we mistakently try to install the old pre-exec /
un-re-set locations of the other breakpoint, which fails:
(gdb) continue
Continuing.
process 28295 is executing new program: (...)/execl-update-breakpoints2
Error in re-setting breakpoint 1: Warning:
Cannot insert breakpoint 2.
Cannot access memory at address 0x1000764
Breakpoint 1, main (argc=1, argv=0x7fffffffd368) at /home/pedro/gdb/mygit/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/execl-update-breakpoints.c:34
34 len = strlen (argv[0]);
(gdb)
Fix this by deferring the global location list update till after all
breakpoints are re-set.
Tested on x86_64 Fedora 20, native and gdbserver.
gdb/ChangeLog:
2016-02-09 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
PR breakpoints/19548
* breakpoint.c (create_overlay_event_breakpoint): Don't update
global location list here.
(create_longjmp_master_breakpoint)
(create_std_terminate_master_breakpoint)
(create_exception_master_breakpoint, create_jit_event_breakpoint)
(update_breakpoint_locations):
(breakpoint_re_set): Update global location list after all
breakpoints are re-set.
gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-02-09 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
PR breakpoints/19548
* gdb.base/execl-update-breakpoints.c (some_function): New
function.
(main): Call it.
* gdb.base/execl-update-breakpoints.exp: Add a second breakpoint.
Tighten expected GDB output.
|
|
gdb/ChangeLog:
Update year range in copyright notice of all files.
|
|
gdb/ChangeLog:
Update year range in copyright notice of all files.
|
|
Following an exec with "breakpoint always-inserted on" tries to insert
breakpoints in the new image at the addresses the symbols had in the
old image.
With "always-inserted off", we see:
gdb gdb.multi/multi-arch-exec -ex "set breakpoint always-inserted off"
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.8.50.20140924-cvs
...
(gdb) b main
Breakpoint 1 at 0x400664: file gdb.multi/multi-arch-exec.c, line 24.
^^^^^^^^
(gdb) c
The program is not being run.
(gdb) r
Starting program: testsuite/gdb.multi/multi-arch-exec
Breakpoint 1, main () at gdb/testsuite/gdb.multi/multi-arch-exec.c:24
24 execl (BASEDIR "/multi-arch-exec-hello",
(gdb) c
Continuing.
process 9212 is executing new program: gdb/testsuite/gdb.multi/multi-arch-exec-hello
Breakpoint 1, main () at gdb/testsuite/gdb.multi/hello.c:40
40 bar();
(gdb) info breakpoints
Num Type Disp Enb Address What
1 breakpoint keep y 0x080484e4 in main at gdb/testsuite/gdb.multi/hello.c:40
^^^^^^^^^^
breakpoint already hit 2 times
(gdb)
Note how main was 0x400664 in multi-arch-exec, and 0x080484e4 in
gdb.multi/hello.
With "always-inserted on", we get:
Breakpoint 1, main () at gdb/testsuite/gdb.multi/multi-arch-exec.c:24
24 execl (BASEDIR "/multi-arch-exec-hello",
(gdb) c
Continuing.
infrun: target_wait (-1, status) =
infrun: 9444 [process 9444],
infrun: status->kind = execd
infrun: infwait_normal_state
infrun: TARGET_WAITKIND_EXECD
Warning:
Cannot insert breakpoint 1.
Cannot access memory at address 0x400664
(gdb)
That is, GDB is trying to insert a breakpoint at 0x400664, after the
exec, and then that address happens to not be mapped at all in the new
image.
The problem is that update_breakpoints_after_exec is creating
breakpoints, which ends up in update_global_location_list immediately
inserting breakpoints if "breakpoints always-inserted" is "on".
update_breakpoints_after_exec is called very early when we see an exec
event. At that point, we haven't loaded the symbols of the new
post-exec image yet, and thus haven't reset breakpoint's addresses to
whatever they may be in the new image. All we should be doing in
update_breakpoints_after_exec is deleting breakpoints that no longer
make sense after an exec. So the fix removes those breakpoint
creations.
The question is then, if not here, where are those breakpoints
re-created? Turns out we don't need to do anything else, because at
the end of follow_exec, we call breakpoint_re_set, whose tail is also
creating exactly the same breakpoints update_breakpoints_after_exec is
currently creating:
breakpoint_re_set (void)
{
...
create_overlay_event_breakpoint ();
create_longjmp_master_breakpoint ();
create_std_terminate_master_breakpoint ();
create_exception_master_breakpoint ();
}
A new test is added to exercise this.
Tested on x86_64 Fedora 20.
gdb/
2014-10-02 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
PR breakpoints/17431
* breakpoint.c (update_breakpoints_after_exec): Don't create
overlay, longjmp, std terminate nor exception breakpoints here.
gdb/testsuite/
2014-10-02 Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
PR breakpoints/17431
* gdb.base/execl-update-breakpoints.c: New file.
* gdb.base/execl-update-breakpoints.exp: New file.
|
