diff options
author | Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> | 2023-01-19 13:44:13 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de> | 2023-01-19 13:44:13 +0100 |
commit | a0d5ef869da20e023e4b75860012c56273f26d92 (patch) | |
tree | 10bff0c68efad75a4c6d98f558942615452adf8b /gdb | |
parent | 75c2efc6f19fe454413aa70d2c37e543f04a67e1 (diff) | |
download | binutils-a0d5ef869da20e023e4b75860012c56273f26d92.zip binutils-a0d5ef869da20e023e4b75860012c56273f26d92.tar.gz binutils-a0d5ef869da20e023e4b75860012c56273f26d92.tar.bz2 |
[gdb/testsuite] Fix gdb.python/py-value-cc.exp for big endian
On s390x-linux, I run into:
...
(gdb) python print(u[u_fields[0]])^M
99^M
(gdb) PASS: gdb.python/py-value-cc.exp: u's first field via field
python print(u[u_fields[1]])^M
0 '\000'^M
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.python/py-value-cc.exp: u's second field via field
...
There's a var u of this type:
...
union U {
int a;
char c;
};
...
and after assigning 99 to u.a, the test-case expects u.c to contain 99 (which
it does on x86_64), but instead it contains 0.
Fix this by instead assigning 0x63636363, to ensure that u.c == 99 for both
little and big endian.
Tested on x86_64-linux and s390x-linux.
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb')
-rw-r--r-- | gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-value-cc.cc | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-value-cc.exp | 3 |
2 files changed, 3 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-value-cc.cc b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-value-cc.cc index 817b089..d82e385 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-value-cc.cc +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-value-cc.cc @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ func (const A &a) Btd &b_td = b1; U u; - u.a = 99; + u.a = 0x63636363; X x; x.x = 101; diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-value-cc.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-value-cc.exp index 1ea10ad..b6571cd 100644 --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-value-cc.exp +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.python/py-value-cc.exp @@ -80,7 +80,8 @@ gdb_test "python print(b_td\[b_fields\[0\]\].type.target())" "A" \ gdb_test "python print(b_td\[b_fields\[0\]\]\['a'\])" "100" \ "b_td.A::a via field" -gdb_test "python print(u\[u_fields\[0\]\])" "99.*" "u's first field via field" +gdb_test "python print(hex(u\[u_fields\[0\]\]))" "0x63636363.*" \ + "u's first field via field" gdb_test "python print(u\[u_fields\[1\]\])" "99.*" "u's second field via field" gdb_test "python print(len(x_fields))" "2" "number for fields in u" |