aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/gdb/testsuite/gdb.fortran/class-allocatable-array.exp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAndrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>2020-05-21 17:35:51 +0100
committerAndrew Burgess <andrew.burgess@embecosm.com>2020-09-19 09:48:35 +0100
commitc8d5abea3d9ad20efb2198ec1b639b8e4dc4d8d3 (patch)
tree0cd187dc483e428bb5fdfc9d4f643433acdc2757 /gdb/testsuite/gdb.fortran/class-allocatable-array.exp
parent6d81691950f8c4be4a49a85a672255c140e82468 (diff)
downloadbinutils-c8d5abea3d9ad20efb2198ec1b639b8e4dc4d8d3.zip
binutils-c8d5abea3d9ad20efb2198ec1b639b8e4dc4d8d3.tar.gz
binutils-c8d5abea3d9ad20efb2198ec1b639b8e4dc4d8d3.tar.bz2
gdb/fortran: Change whitespace when printing arrays
This commit makes the whitespace usage when printing Fortran arrays more consistent, and more inline with how we print C arrays. Currently a 2 dimensional Fotran array is printed like this, I find the marked whitespace unpleasant: (( 1, 2, 3) ( 4, 5, 6) ) ^ ^ ^ After this commit the same array is printed like this: ((1, 2, 3) (4, 5, 6)) Which seems more inline with how we print C arrays, in the case of C arrays we don't add extra whitespace before the first element. gdb/ChangeLog: * f-valprint.c (f77_print_array_1): Adjust printing of whitespace for arrays. gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gdb.fortran/array-slices.exp: Update expected results. * gdb.fortran/class-allocatable-array.exp: Likewise. * gdb.fortran/multi-dim.exp: Likewise. * gdb.fortran/vla-type.exp: Likewise. * gdb.mi/mi-vla-fortran.exp: Likewise.
Diffstat (limited to 'gdb/testsuite/gdb.fortran/class-allocatable-array.exp')
-rw-r--r--gdb/testsuite/gdb.fortran/class-allocatable-array.exp2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.fortran/class-allocatable-array.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.fortran/class-allocatable-array.exp
index 9475ba3..cdee73f 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.fortran/class-allocatable-array.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.fortran/class-allocatable-array.exp
@@ -40,4 +40,4 @@ gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "Break Here"
# cetainly going to fail.
gdb_test "print this" " = \\( _data = \[^\r\n\]+, _vptr = \[^\r\n\]+\\)"
gdb_test "print this%_data" " = \\(PTR TO -> \\( Type test_type \\)\\) \[^\r\n\]+"
-gdb_test "print this%_data%b" " = \\(\\( 1, 2, 3\\) \\( 4, 5, 6\\) \\)"
+gdb_test "print this%_data%b" " = \\(\\(1, 2, 3\\) \\(4, 5, 6\\)\\)"