- Feb 03, 2017
-
-
Bob Haarman authored
Summary: The COFF linker previously implemented link-time optimization using an API which has now been marked as legacy. This change refactors the COFF linker to use the new LTO API, which is also used by the ELF linker. Reviewers: pcc, ruiu Reviewed By: pcc Subscribers: mgorny, mehdi_amini Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29059 llvm-svn: 293967
-
Bob Haarman authored
llvm-svn: 293966
-
Bob Haarman authored
Summary: llvm/CodeGen/CommandFlags.h a utility function InitTargetOptionsFromCodeGenFlags which is used to set target options from flags based on the command line. The command line flags are stored in globals defined in the same file, and including the file in multiple places causes the globals to be defined multiple times, leading to linker errors. This change adds a single place in lld where these globals are defined and exports only the utility function. This makes it possible to call InitTargetOptionsFromCodeGenFlags from multiple places in lld, which a follow-up change will do. Reviewers: davide, ruiu Reviewed By: davide, ruiu Subscribers: mgorny Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29058 llvm-svn: 293965
-
Konstantin Zhuravlyov authored
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29131 llvm-svn: 293964
-
Rui Ueyama authored
llvm-svn: 293963
-
Matt Arsenault authored
In multi-use cases this can save a few instructions. llvm-svn: 293962
-
Mehdi Amini authored
This reverts commit r293918, one lld test does not pass. llvm-svn: 293961
-
Bob Haarman authored
Summary: This allows clients of the LTO API to determine the name of the fallback symbol for COFF weak externals. Reviewers: pcc Reviewed By: pcc Subscribers: mehdi_amini Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29365 llvm-svn: 293960
-
Marcos Pividori authored
On Windows, the symbols "___stop___sancov_guards" and "___start___sancov_guards" are not defined automatically. So, we need to take a different approach. We define 3 sections: ".SCOV$A", ".SCOV$M" and ".SCOV$Z". Section ".SCOV$A" will only hold a variable ___start___sancov_guard. Section ".SCOV$M" will hold the main data. Section ".SCOV$Z" will only hold a variable ___stop___sancov_guards. When linking, they will be merged sorted by the characters after the $, so we can use the pointers of the variables ___[start|stop]___sancov_guard to know the actual range of addresses of that section. ___[start|stop]___sancov_guard should be defined only once per module. On Windows, we have 2 different cases: + When considering a shared runtime: All the modules, main executable and dlls, are linked to an auxiliary static library dynamic_runtime_thunk.lib. Because of that, we include the delimiters in `SancovDynamicRuntimeThunk`. + When considering a static runtime: The main executable in linked to the static runtime library. All the dlls are linked to an auxiliary static library dll_thunk. Because of that, we include the delimiter to both `SancovDllThunk` and `SANITIZER_LIBCDEP_SOURCES` (which is included in the static runtime lib). Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28435 llvm-svn: 293959
-
Marcos Pividori authored
In Windows, when sanitizers are implemented as a shared library (DLL), users can redefine and export a new definition for weak functions, in the main executable, for example: extern "C" __declspec(dllexport) void __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc_guard(u32* guard) { // Different implementation provided by the client. } However, other dlls, will continue using the default implementation imported from the sanitizer dll. This is different in linux, where all the shared libraries will consider the strong definition. With the implementation in this diff, when the dll is initialized, it will check if the main executable exports the definition for some weak function (for example __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc_guard). If it finds that function, then it will override the function in the dll with that pointer. So, all the dlls with instrumentation that import __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc_guard__dll() from asan dll, will be using the function provided by the main executable. In other words, when the main executable exports a strong definition for a weak function, we ensure all the dlls use that implementation instead of the default weak implementation. The behavior is similar to linux. Now, every user that want to override a weak function, only has to define and export it. The same for Linux and Windows, and it will work fine. So, there is no difference on the user's side. All the sanitizers will include a file sanitizer_win_weak_interception.cc that register sanitizer's weak functions to be intercepted in the binary section WEAK When the sanitizer dll is initialized, it will execute weak_intercept_init() which will consider all the CB registered in the section WEAK. So, for all the weak functions registered, we will check if a strong definition is provided in the main executable. All the files sanitizer_win_weak_interception.cc are independent, so we do not need to include a specific list of sanitizers. Now, we include [asan|ubsan|sanitizer_coverage]_win_weak_interception.cc and sanitizer_win_weak_interception.cc in asan dll, so when it is initialized, it will consider all the weak functions from asan, ubsan and sanitizer coverage. After this diff, sanitizer coverage is fixed for MD on Windows. In particular libFuzzer can provide custom implementation for all sanitizer coverage's weak functions, and they will be considered by asan dll. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29168 llvm-svn: 293958 -
Marcos Pividori authored
In this diff I update the code for asan on Windows, so we can intercept SetUnhandledExceptionFilter and catch some exceptions depending on the result of IsHandledDeadlyException() (which depends on asan flags). This way we have the same behavior on Windows and Posix systems. On Posix, we intercept signal and sigaction, so user's code can only register signal handlers for signals that are not handled by asan. After this diff, the same happens on Windows, user's code can only register exception handlers for exceptions that are not handled by asan. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29463 llvm-svn: 293957
-
Marcos Pividori authored
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29459 llvm-svn: 293956
-
Marcos Pividori authored
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29458 llvm-svn: 293955
-
Marcos Pividori authored
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29457 llvm-svn: 293954
-
Marcos Pividori authored
In Windows, when the sanitizer is implemented as a shared library (DLL), we need an auxiliary static library dynamic_runtime_thunk that will be linked to the main executable and dlls. In the sanitizer DLL, we are exposing weak functions with WIN_WEAK_EXPORT_DEF(), which exports the default implementation with __dll suffix. For example: for sanitizer coverage, the default implementation of __sanitizer_cov_trace_cmp is exported as: __sanitizer_cov_trace_cmp__dll. In the dynamic_runtime_thunk static library, we include weak aliases to the imported implementation from the dll, using the macro WIN_WEAK_IMPORT_DEF(). By default, all users's programs that include calls to weak functions like __sanitizer_cov_trace_cmp, will be redirected to the implementation in the dll, when linking to dynamic_runtime_thunk. After this diff, we are able to compile code with sanitizer coverage instrumentation on Windows. When the instrumented object files are linked with clang-rt_asan_dynamic_runtime_thunk-arch.lib all the weak symbols will be resolved to the implementation imported from asan dll. All the files sanitizer_dynamic_runtime_thunk.cc are independent, so we do not need to include a specific list of sanitizers. Now, we compile: [asan|ubsan|sanitizer_coverage]_win_dynamic_runtime_thunk.cc and sanitizer_win_dynamic_runtime_thunk.cc to generate asan_dynamic_runtime_thunk.lib, because we include asan, ubsan and sanitizer coverage in the address sanitizer library. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29158 llvm-svn: 293953
-
Marcos Pividori authored
In this diff, I update current implementation of the interception in dll_thunks to consider the special case of weak functions. First we check if the client has redefined the function in the main executable (for example: __sanitizer_cov_trace_pc_guard). It we can't find it, then we look for the default implementation (__sanitizer_cov_trace_pc_guard__dll). The default implementation is always available because the static runtime is linked to the main executable. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29155 llvm-svn: 293952
-
Marcos Pividori authored
When the sanitizer is implemented as a static library and is included in the main executable, we need an auxiliary static library dll_thunk that will be linked to the dlls that have instrumentation, so they can refer to the runtime in the main executable. Basically, it uses interception to get a pointer the function in the main executable and override its function with that pointer. Before this diff, all of the implementation for dll_thunks was included in asan. In this diff I split it into different sanitizers, so we can use other sanitizers regardless of whether we include asan or not. All the sanitizers include a file sanitizer_win_dll_thunk.cc that register functions to be intercepted in the binary section: DLLTH When the dll including dll_thunk is initialized, it will execute __dll_thunk_init() implemented in: sanitizer_common/sanitizer_win_dll_thunk.cc, which will consider all the CB registered in the section DLLTH. So, all the functions registered will be intercepted, and redirected to the implementation in the main executable. All the files "sanitizer_win_dll_thunk.cc" are independent, so we don't need to include a specific list of sanitizers. Now, we compile: asan_win_dll_thunk.cc ubsan_win_dll_thunk.cc, sanitizer_coverage_win_dll_thunk.cc and sanitizer_win_dll_thunk.cc, to generate asan_dll_thunk, because we include asan, ubsan and sanitizer coverage in the address sanitizer library. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29154 llvm-svn: 293951
-
Bob Haarman authored
Summary: Some compilers, including MSVC and Clang, allow linker options to be specified in source files. In the legacy LTO API, there is a getLinkerOpts() method that returns linker options for the bitcode module being processed. This change adds that method to the new API, so that the COFF linker can get the right linker options when using the new LTO API. Reviewers: pcc, ruiu, mehdi_amini, tejohnson Reviewed By: pcc Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29207 llvm-svn: 293950
-
Eugene Zelenko authored
llvm-svn: 293949
-
Pavel Labath authored
llvm-svn: 293948
-
Rafael Espindola authored
llvm-svn: 293946
-
Reid Kleckner authored
Effectively reverts r290248 and fixes the unused function warning with ifndef NDEBUG. llvm-svn: 293945
-
Craig Topper authored
On one test this seems to have given more chance for DAG combine to do other INSERT_SUBVECTOR/EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR combines before the BLENDI was created. Looks like we can still improve more by teaching DAG combine to optimize INSERT_SUBVECTOR/EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR with BLENDI. llvm-svn: 293944
-
Reid Kleckner authored
This enum has been dead since Olivier Stannard re-implemented ARM byval handling in r202985 (2014). llvm-svn: 293943
-
Zachary Turner authored
This moves the following classes from Core -> Utility. ConstString Error RegularExpression Stream StreamString The goal here is to get lldbUtility into a state where it has no dependendencies except on itself and LLVM, so it can be the starting point at which to start untangling LLDB's dependencies. These are all low level and very widely used classes, and previously lldbUtility had dependencies up to lldbCore in order to use these classes. So moving then down to lldbUtility makes sense from both the short term and long term perspective in solving this problem. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29427 llvm-svn: 293941
-
Bill Seurer authored
This test fails consistently on Ubuntu 16.xx powerpc64 LE systems. The cause is being investigated and in the meantime disable it so the buildbots can run cleanly. llvm-svn: 293939
-
Xinliang David Li authored
1. Added comments for options 2. Added missing option cl::desc field 3. Uniified function filter option for graph viewing. Now PGO count/raw-counts share the same filter option: -view-bfi-func-name=. llvm-svn: 293938
-
Rafael Espindola authored
llvm-svn: 293937
-
Rafael Espindola authored
On ELF every section can have a corresponding section symbol. When in an assembly file we have .quad .text the '.text' refers to that symbol. The way we used to handle them is to leave .text an undefined symbol until the very end when the object writer would map them to the actual section symbol. The problem with that is that anything before the end would see an undefined symbol. This could result in bad diagnostics (test/MC/AArch64/label-arithmetic-diags-elf.s), or incorrect results when using the asm streamer (est/MC/Mips/expansion-jal-sym-pic.s). Fixing this will also allow using the section symbol earlier for setting sh_link of SHF_METADATA sections. This patch includes a few hacks to avoid changing our behaviour when handling conflicts between section symbols and other symbols. I reported pr31850 to track that. llvm-svn: 293936
-
Javed Absar authored
This is the second in the series of patches to enable adding of machine sched-models for ARM processors easier and compact. This patch focuses on integer instructions and adds missing sched definitions. Reviewers: rovka, rengolin Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29127 llvm-svn: 293935
-
Quentin Colombet authored
In r283838, we added the capability of splitting unspillable register. When doing so we had to make sure the split live-ranges were also unspillable and we did that by marking the related live-ranges in the delegate method that is called when a new vreg is created. However, by accessing the live-range there, we also triggered their lazy computation (LiveIntervalAnalysis::getInterval) which is not what we want in general. Indeed, later code in LiveRangeEdit is going to build the live-ranges this lazy computation may mess up that computation resulting in assertion failures. Namely, the createEmptyIntervalFrom method expect that the live-range is going to be empty, not computed. Thanks to Mikael Holmén <mikael.holmen@ericsson.com> for noticing and reporting the problem. llvm-svn: 293934
-
Krzysztof Parzyszek authored
Patch by Colin LeMahieu. llvm-svn: 293933
-
Michael Kuperstein authored
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29416 llvm-svn: 293932
-
Krzysztof Parzyszek authored
Patch by Sid Manning. llvm-svn: 293931
-
Vitaly Buka authored
Summary: snprintf returns buffer size needed for printing. If buffer was small, calling code receives incorrectly symbolized buffer and fail. Reviewers: eugenis Subscribers: kubamracek, dberris, kcc Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29440 llvm-svn: 293930
-
Krzysztof Parzyszek authored
Patch by Colin LeMahieu. llvm-svn: 293929
-
Kostya Serebryany authored
[libFuzzer] reorganize the tracing code to make it easier to experiment with inlined coverage instrumentation. NFC llvm-svn: 293928
-
Eric Liu authored
llvm-svn: 293927
-
Dan Albert authored
Summary: num_put::put uses %p for pointer types, but the exact format of %p is implementation defined behavior for the C library. Compare output to snprintf for portability. Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists Reviewed By: EricWF Subscribers: cfe-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29197 llvm-svn: 293926
-
Krzysztof Parzyszek authored
llvm-svn: 293925
-