- Nov 14, 2019
-
-
Simon Atanasyan authored
-
Simon Atanasyan authored
-
Simon Atanasyan authored
-
Quentin Colombet authored
During register coalescing, we update the live-intervals on-the-fly. To do that we are in this strange mode where the live-intervals can be slightly out-of-sync (more precisely they are forward looking) compared to what the IR actually represents. This happens because the register coalescer only updates the IR when it is done with updating the live-intervals and it has to do it this way because updating the IR on-the-fly would actually clobber some information on how the live-ranges that are being updated look like. This is problematic for updates that rely on the IR to accurately represents the state of the live-ranges. Right now, we have only one of those: stripValuesNotDefiningMask. To reconcile this need of out-of-sync IR, this patch introduces a new argument to LiveInterval::refineSubRanges that allows the code doing the live range updates to reason about how the code should look like after the coalescer will have rewritten the registers. Essentially this captures how a subregister index with be offseted to match its position in a new register class. E.g., let say we want to merge: V1.sub1:<2 x s32> = COPY V2.sub3:<4 x s32> We do that by choosing a class where sub1:<2 x s32> and sub3:<4 x s32> overlap, i.e., by choosing a class where we can find "offset + 1 == 3". Put differently we align V2's sub3 with V1's sub1: V2: sub0 sub1 sub2 sub3 V1: <offset> sub0 sub1 This offset will look like a composed subregidx in the the class: V1.(composed sub2 with sub1):<4 x s32> = COPY V2.sub3:<4 x s32> => V1.(composed sub2 with sub1):<4 x s32> = COPY V2.sub3:<4 x s32> Now if we didn't rewrite the uses and def of V1, all the checks for V1 need to account for this offset to match what the live intervals intend to capture. Prior to this patch, we would fail to recognize the uses and def of V1 and would end up with machine verifier errors: No live segment at def. This could lead to miscompile as we would drop some live-ranges and thus, miss some interferences. For this problem to trigger, we need to reach stripValuesNotDefiningMask while having a mismatch between the IR and the live-ranges (i.e., we have to apply a subreg offset to the IR.) This requires the following three conditions: 1. An update of overlapping subreg lanes: e.g., dsub0 == <ssub0, ssub1> 2. An update with Tuple registers with a possibility to coalesce the subreg index: e.g., v1.dsub_1 == v2.dsub_3 3. Subreg liveness enabled. looking at the IR to decide what is alive and what is not, i.e., calling stripValuesNotDefiningMask. coalescer maintains for the live-ranges information. None of the targets that currently use subreg liveness (i.e., the targets that fulfill #3, Hexagon, AMDGPU, PowerPC, and SystemZ IIRC) expose #1 and and #2, so this patch also artificial enables subreg liveness for ARM, so that a nice test case can be attached. -
Michael Liao authored
- Only split vector types when both src and dst types are splittable.
-
Francis Visoiu Mistrih authored
With all the previous refactorings this slipped through and now we always dump the contents of the bitcode files, even if -dump is not passed.
-
Ahmed Bougacha authored
RETA always implicitly uses LR, unlike RET which merely has an alias that defaults it to LR. Additionally, RETA implicitly uses SP as well, which it uses as a discriminator to authenticate LR. This isn't usually noticeable, because RET_ReallyLR is used in most of the backend. However, the post-RA scheduler, if enabled, will cause miscompiles if the imp-uses are missing. While there, fix a typo in the lone affected testcase.
-
Ahmed Bougacha authored
The instruction definition has been retroactively expanded to allow for an alias for '[xN, 0]!' as '[xN]!'. That wouldn't make sense on LDR, but does for LDRA.
-
Sanjay Patel authored
-
Yonghong Song authored
Depending on different cmake configures, clang may generate different IR name for slot variables. Let us use the regex instead of hard coding the name. I did the same for other bpf-attr-preserve-access-index tests with such an approach, but somehow did not do for this one.
-
Edward Jones authored
If a GCC installation is not detected, then this attempts to use compiler-rt and the compiler-rt crtbegin/crtend implementations as a fallback. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68407
-
David Stenberg authored
-
David Tenty authored
Summary: when building plugins, as AIX has symbols in it's standard library that must be garbage collected or we will see link errors. Export lists will handle this instead on AIX. Reviewers: stevewan, sfertile, jasonliu, xingxue, DiggerLin Reviewed By: DiggerLin Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70130
-
Yonghong Song authored
Add the newly supported BPF specific __attribute__((preserve_access_index) in the pragma-attribute-supported-attributes-list.test.
-
Sanjay Patel authored
-
Yonghong Song authored
This is a resubmission for the previous reverted commit 94343604 with the same subject. This commit fixed the segfault issue and addressed additional review comments. This patch introduced a new bpf specific attribute which can be added to struct or union definition. For example, struct s { ... } __attribute__((preserve_access_index)); union u { ... } __attribute__((preserve_access_index)); The goal is to simplify user codes for cases where preserve access index happens for certain struct/union, so user does not need to use clang __builtin_preserve_access_index for every members. The attribute has no effect if -g is not specified. When the attribute is specified and -g is specified, any member access defined by that structure or union, including array subscript access and inner records, will be preserved through __builtin_preserve_{array,struct,union}_access_index() IR intrinsics, which will enable relocation generation in bpf backend. The following is an example to illustrate the usage: -bash-4.4$ cat t.c #define __reloc__ __attribute__((preserve_access_index)) struct s1 { int c; } __reloc__; struct s2 { union { struct s1 b[3]; }; } __reloc__; struct s3 { struct s2 a; } __reloc__; int test(struct s3 *arg) { return arg->a.b[2].c; } -bash-4.4$ clang -target bpf -g -S -O2 t.c A relocation with access string "0:0:0:0:2:0" will be generated representing access offset of arg->a.b[2].c. forward declaration with attribute is also handled properly such that the attribute is copied and populated in real record definition. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69759
-
Matthew Malcomson authored
-
- Nov 13, 2019
-
-
Vedant Kumar authored
Split out the logic to get the size of a merged profile and to do a compatibility check. This can be shared with both the continuous+merging mode implementation, as well as the runtime-allocated counters implementation planned for Fuchsia. Lifted out of D69586. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70135
-
Sanjay Patel authored
As noted by the FIXME comment, this is not correct based on our current FMF semantics. We should be propagating FMF from the final value in a sequence (in this case the 'select'). So the behavior even without this patch is wrong, but we did not allow FMF on 'select' until recently. But if we do the correct thing right now in this patch, we'll inevitably introduce regressions because we have not wired up FMF propagation for 'phi' and 'select' in other passes (like SimplifyCFG) or other places in InstCombine. I'm not seeing a better incremental way to make progress. That said, the potential extra damage over the existing wrong behavior from this patch is very limited. AFAIK, the only way to have different FMF on IR in the same function is if we have LTO inlined IR from 2 modules that were compiled using different fast-math settings. As seen in the tests, we may actually see some improvements with this patch because adding the FMF to the 'select' allows matching to min/max intrinsics that were previously missed (in the common case, the 'fcmp' and 'select' should have identical FMF to begin with). Next steps in the transition: Make similar changes in instcombine as needed. Enable phi-to-select FMF propagation in SimplifyCFG. Remove dependencies on fcmp with FMF. Deprecate FMF on fcmp. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69720 -
Pavel Labath authored
Summary: This avoid the need to duplicate the location lists searching logic in various users. The "inline location list dumping" code (which is the only user actually updated to handle DWARF v5 location lists) is switched to this method. After adding v4 location list support, I'll switch other users too. Reviewers: dblaikie, probinson, JDevlieghere, aprantl, SouraVX Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70084
-
Simon Pilgrim authored
-
Simon Pilgrim authored
-
Simon Pilgrim authored
-
Simon Pilgrim authored
-
Simon Pilgrim authored
-
Simon Pilgrim authored
-
Simon Pilgrim authored
- Fix uninitialized variable warnings. - Fix null dereference warnings.
-
Simon Pilgrim authored
Fixes cppcheck warnings.
-
Kadir Cetinkaya authored
Summary: Flags that generate output could result in failures when creating syntax only actions. This patch introduces initial logic for filtering out those. The first such flag is "save-temps", which saves intermediate files(bitcode, assembly, etc.) into a specified directory. Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/191 Reviewers: hokein Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, usaxena95, cfe-commits Tags: #clang Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70173
-
Haojian Wu authored
Summary: Similar to fuzzyFind, the bool indicates whether there are more xref results. Reviewers: ilya-biryukov Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits Tags: #clang Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70139
-
Florian Hahn authored
I think we have to be a bit more careful when it comes to moving ops across shuffles, if the op does restrict undef. For example, without this patch, we would move 'and %v, <0, 0, -1, -1>' over a 'shufflevector %a, undef, <undef, undef, 1, 2>'. As a result, the first 2 lanes of the result are undef after the combine, but they really should be 0, unless I am missing something. For ops that do fold to undef on undef operands, the current behavior should be fine. I've add conservative check OpDoesRestrictUndef, maybe there's a better existing utility? Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, lebedev.ri Reviewed By: spatel Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70093
-
Luís Marques authored
test/DebugInfo/RISCV/relax-debug-frame.ll wasn't properly updated.
-
Florian Hahn authored
-
Sjoerd Meijer authored
This implements TTI hook 'preferPredicateOverEpilogue' for MVE. This is a first version and it operates on single block loops only. With this change, the vectoriser will now determine if tail-folding scalar remainder loops is possible/desired, which is the first step to generate MVE tail-predicated vector loops. This is disabled by default for now. I.e,, this is depends on option -disable-mve-tail-predication, which is off by default. I will follow up on this soon with a patch for the vectoriser to respect loop hint 'vectorize.predicate.enable'. I.e., with this loop hint set to Disabled, we don't want to tail-fold and we shouldn't query this TTI hook, which is done in D70125. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69845
-
Luís Marques authored
Summary: Removes CFI CFA directives that could incorrectly propagate beyond the basic block they were inteded for. Specifically it removes the epilogue CFI directives. See the branch_and_tail_call test for an example of the issue. Should fix the stack unwinding issues caused by the incorrect directives. Reviewers: asb, lenary, shiva0217 Reviewed By: lenary Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69723
-
Simon Tatham authored
This patch adds the ACLE intrinsics for all the MVE load and store instructions not already handled by D69791. These ones don't need new IR intrinsics, because they can be implemented in terms of standard LLVM IR constructions. Some of the load and store instructions access less than 128 bits of memory, sign/zero extending each value to a wider vector lane on load or truncating it on store. These are represented in IR by a load of a shorter vector followed by a zext/sext, and conversely, a trunc followed by a short store. Existing ISel patterns already recognize those combinations and turn them into the right MVE instructions. The predicated forms of all these instructions are represented in the same way, except that the ordinary load/store operation is replaced with the existing intrinsics @llvm.masked.{load,store}. These are currently only code-generated as predicated MVE load/store instructions if you give LLVM the `-enable-arm-maskedldst` option; so I've done that in the LLVM codegen test. When we make that the default, that option can be removed. In the Tablegen backend, I've had to add a handful of extra support features: * We need to be able to make clang::Address objects out of a pointer and an alignment (previously we only needed these when the user passed us an existing one). * We can now specify vector types that aren't 128 bits wide (for use in those intermediate values in IR), the parametrized type system can make one starting from two existing vector types (using the lane count of one and the element type of the other). * I've added support for code generation of pointer casts, and for specifying LLVM types as operands to IRBuilder operations (for zext and sext, though I think they'll come in useful again). * Now not all IR construction operations need to be specified as Builder.CreateFoo; some don't involve a Builder at all, and one passes it as a parameter to a tiny static helper function in CGBuiltin.cpp. Reviewers: ostannard, MarkMurrayARM, dmgreen Subscribers: kristof.beyls, cfe-commits, llvm-commits Tags: #clang, #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70088 -
Simon Pilgrim authored
These are really just placeholders that use approximately the right resources - once we have CPUs scheduler models that support these instructions they will need revisiting. In the meantime this means that all instructions have a class of some kind., meaning models can be more easily flagged as complete.
-
JonChesterfield authored
Summary: [libomptarget] Move supporti.h to support.cu Reimplementation of D69652, without the unity build and refactors. Will need a clean build of libomptarget as the cmakelists changed. Reviewers: ABataev, jdoerfert Reviewed By: jdoerfert Subscribers: mgorny, jfb, openmp-commits Tags: #openmp Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70131
-
Hans Wennborg authored
This caused miscompiles of Chromium (https://crbug.com/1023818). The reduced repro is small enough to fit here: $ cat /tmp/a.c unsigned char f(unsigned char *p) { unsigned char result = 0; for (int shift = 0; shift < 1; ++shift) result |= p[0] << (shift * 8); return result; } $ bin/clang -O2 -S -o - /tmp/a.c | grep -A4 f: f: # @f .cfi_startproc # %bb.0: # %entry xorl %eax, %eax retq That's nicely optimized, but I don't think it's the right result :-) > Same as D60846 but with a fix for the problem encountered there which > was a missing context adjustment in the handling of PHI nodes. > > The test that caused D60846 to be reverted was added in e15ab8f2. > > Reviewers: nikic, nlopes, mkazantsev,spatel, dlrobertson, uabelho, hakzsam > > Subscribers: hiraditya, bollu, llvm-commits > > Tags: #llvm > > Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69571 This reverts commit 57dd4b03.
-
Mirko Brkusanin authored
Instruction ldi.fmt can be considered cheap enough to avoid spill and restore of value that it produces since it's loaded from immediate. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69898
-