[TargetLowering] Increase the storage size of NumRegistersForVT to allow the type break down for v256i1 and other types to be stored correctly

v256i1 on X86 without avx512 breaks down to 256 i8 values when passed between basic blocks. But the NumRegistersForVT was sized at a byte for each VT. This results in 256 being stored as 0.

This patch enlarges the type to 16 bits and adds an assert to ensure that no information is lost when the entry is stored.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70138

During register coalescing, we update the live-intervals on-the-fly.
To do that we are in this strange mode where the live-intervals can
be slightly out-of-sync (more precisely they are forward looking)
compared to what the IR actually represents.
This happens because the register coalescer only updates the IR when
it is done with updating the live-intervals and it has to do it this
way because updating the IR on-the-fly would actually clobber some
information on how the live-ranges that are being updated look like.

This is problematic for updates that rely on the IR to accurately
represents the state of the live-ranges. Right now, we have only
one of those: stripValuesNotDefiningMask.
To reconcile this need of out-of-sync IR, this patch introduces a
new argument to LiveInterval::refineSubRanges that allows the code
doing the live range updates to reason about how the code should
look like after the coalescer will have rewritten the registers.
Essentially this captures how a subregister index with be offseted
to match its position in a new register class.

E.g., let say we want to merge:
    V1.sub1:<2 x s32> = COPY V2.sub3:<4 x s32>

We do that by choosing a class where sub1:<2 x s32> and sub3:<4 x s32>
overlap, i.e., by choosing a class where we can find "offset + 1 == 3".
Put differently we align V2's sub3 with V1's sub1:
    V2: sub0 sub1 sub2 sub3
    V1: <offset>  sub0 sub1

This offset will look like a composed subregidx in the the class:
     V1.(composed sub2 with sub1):<4 x s32> = COPY V2.sub3:<4 x s32>
 =>  V1.(composed sub2 with sub1):<4 x s32> = COPY V2.sub3:<4 x s32>

Now if we didn't rewrite the uses and def of V1, all the checks for V1
need to account for this offset to match what the live intervals intend
to capture.

Prior to this patch, we would fail to recognize the uses and def of V1
and would end up with machine verifier errors: No live segment at def.
This could lead to miscompile as we would drop some live-ranges and
thus, miss some interferences.

For this problem to trigger, we need to reach stripValuesNotDefiningMask
while having a mismatch between the IR and the live-ranges (i.e.,
we have to apply a subreg offset to the IR.)

This requires the following three conditions:
1. An update of overlapping subreg lanes: e.g., dsub0 == <ssub0, ssub1>
2. An update with Tuple registers with a possibility to coalesce the
   subreg index: e.g., v1.dsub_1 == v2.dsub_3
3. Subreg liveness enabled.

looking at the IR to decide what is alive and what is not, i.e., calling
stripValuesNotDefiningMask.
coalescer maintains for the live-ranges information.

None of the targets that currently use subreg liveness (i.e., the targets
that fulfill #3, Hexagon, AMDGPU, PowerPC, and SystemZ IIRC) expose #1 and
and #2, so this patch also artificial enables subreg liveness for ARM,
so that a nice test case can be attached.

- Only split vector types when both src and dst types are splittable.

With all the previous refactorings this slipped through and now we
always dump the contents of the bitcode files, even if -dump is not
passed.

RETA always implicitly uses LR, unlike RET which merely has an
alias that defaults it to LR.
Additionally, RETA implicitly uses SP as well, which it uses as
a discriminator to authenticate LR.

This isn't usually noticeable, because RET_ReallyLR is used in most
of the backend.  However, the post-RA scheduler, if enabled, will
cause miscompiles if the imp-uses are missing.

While there, fix a typo in the lone affected testcase.

The instruction definition has been retroactively expanded to
allow for an alias for '[xN, 0]!' as '[xN]!'.
That wouldn't make sense on LDR, but does for LDRA.

Depending on different cmake configures, clang may generate different
IR name for slot variables. Let us use the regex instead of hard
coding the name. I did the same for other bpf-attr-preserve-access-index
tests with such an approach, but somehow did not do for this one.

If a GCC installation is not detected, then this attempts to
use compiler-rt and the compiler-rt crtbegin/crtend
implementations as a fallback.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68407

Summary:
when building plugins, as AIX has symbols in it's standard library that
must be garbage collected or we will see link errors. Export lists will
handle this instead on AIX.

Reviewers: stevewan, sfertile, jasonliu, xingxue, DiggerLin

Reviewed By: DiggerLin

Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70130

Add the newly supported BPF specific __attribute__((preserve_access_index)
in the pragma-attribute-supported-attributes-list.test.

This is a resubmission for the previous reverted commit
94343604 with the same subject. This commit fixed the
segfault issue and addressed additional review comments.

This patch introduced a new bpf specific attribute which can
be added to struct or union definition. For example,
  struct s { ... } __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
  union u { ... } __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
The goal is to simplify user codes for cases
where preserve access index happens for certain struct/union,
so user does not need to use clang __builtin_preserve_access_index
for every members.

The attribute has no effect if -g is not specified.

When the attribute is specified and -g is specified, any member
access defined by that structure or union, including array subscript
access and inner records, will be preserved through
  __builtin_preserve_{array,struct,union}_access_index()
IR intrinsics, which will enable relocation generation
in bpf backend.

The following is an example to illustrate the usage:
  -bash-4.4$ cat t.c
  #define __reloc__ __attribute__((preserve_access_index))
  struct s1 {
    int c;
  } __reloc__;

  struct s2 {
    union {
      struct s1 b[3];
    };
  } __reloc__;

  struct s3 {
    struct s2 a;
  } __reloc__;

  int test(struct s3 *arg) {
    return arg->a.b[2].c;
  }
  -bash-4.4$ clang -target bpf -g -S -O2 t.c

A relocation with access string "0:0:0:0:2:0" will be generated
representing access offset of arg->a.b[2].c.

forward declaration with attribute is also handled properly such
that the attribute is copied and populated in real record definition.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69759

Split out the logic to get the size of a merged profile and to do a
compatibility check. This can be shared with both the continuous+merging
mode implementation, as well as the runtime-allocated counters
implementation planned for Fuchsia.

Lifted out of D69586.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70135

As noted by the FIXME comment, this is not correct based on our current FMF semantics.
We should be propagating FMF from the final value in a sequence (in this case the
'select'). So the behavior even without this patch is wrong, but we did not allow FMF
on 'select' until recently.

But if we do the correct thing right now in this patch, we'll inevitably introduce
regressions because we have not wired up FMF propagation for 'phi' and 'select' in
other passes (like SimplifyCFG) or other places in InstCombine. I'm not seeing a
better incremental way to make progress.

That said, the potential extra damage over the existing wrong behavior from this
patch is very limited. AFAIK, the only way to have different FMF on IR in the same
function is if we have LTO inlined IR from 2 modules that were compiled using
different fast-math settings.

As seen in the tests, we may actually see some improvements with this patch because
adding the FMF to the 'select' allows matching to min/max intrinsics that were
previously missed (in the common case, the 'fcmp' and 'select' should have identical
FMF to begin with).

Next steps in the transition:

    Make similar changes in instcombine as needed.
    Enable phi-to-select FMF propagation in SimplifyCFG.
    Remove dependencies on fcmp with FMF.
    Deprecate FMF on fcmp.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69720

Summary:
This avoid the need to duplicate the location lists searching logic in
various users. The "inline location list dumping" code (which is the
only user actually updated to handle DWARF v5 location lists)  is
switched to this method. After adding v4 location list support, I'll
switch other users too.

Reviewers: dblaikie, probinson, JDevlieghere, aprantl, SouraVX

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70084

- Fix uninitialized variable warnings.
- Fix null dereference warnings.

Fixes cppcheck warnings.

Summary:
Flags that generate output could result in failures when creating
syntax only actions. This patch introduces initial logic for filtering out
those. The first such flag is "save-temps", which saves intermediate
files(bitcode, assembly, etc.) into a specified directory.

Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/191

Reviewers: hokein

Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, usaxena95, cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70173

Summary:
Similar to fuzzyFind, the bool indicates whether there are more xref
results.

Reviewers: ilya-biryukov

Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov

Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70139

I think we have to be a bit more careful when it comes to moving
ops across shuffles, if the op does restrict undef. For example, without
this patch, we would move 'and %v, <0, 0, -1, -1>' over a
'shufflevector %a, undef, <undef, undef, 1, 2>'. As a result, the first
2 lanes of the result are undef after the combine, but they really
should be 0, unless I am missing something.

For ops that do fold to undef on undef operands, the current behavior
should be fine. I've add conservative check OpDoesRestrictUndef, maybe
there's a better existing utility?

Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, lebedev.ri

Reviewed By: spatel

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70093

test/DebugInfo/RISCV/relax-debug-frame.ll wasn't properly updated.

This implements TTI hook 'preferPredicateOverEpilogue' for MVE.  This is a
first version and it operates on single block loops only. With this change, the
vectoriser will now determine if tail-folding scalar remainder loops is
possible/desired, which is the first step to generate MVE tail-predicated
vector loops.

This is disabled by default for now. I.e,, this is depends on option
-disable-mve-tail-predication, which is off by default.

I will follow up on this soon with a patch for the vectoriser to respect loop
hint 'vectorize.predicate.enable'. I.e., with this loop hint set to Disabled,
we don't want to tail-fold and we shouldn't query this TTI hook, which is
done in D70125.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69845

Summary: Removes CFI CFA directives that could incorrectly propagate
beyond the basic block they were inteded for. Specifically it removes
the epilogue CFI directives. See the branch_and_tail_call test for an
example of the issue. Should fix the stack unwinding issues caused by
the incorrect directives.

Reviewers: asb, lenary, shiva0217
Reviewed By: lenary
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69723

This patch adds the ACLE intrinsics for all the MVE load and store
instructions not already handled by D69791. These ones don't need new
IR intrinsics, because they can be implemented in terms of standard
LLVM IR constructions.

Some of the load and store instructions access less than 128 bits of
memory, sign/zero extending each value to a wider vector lane on load
or truncating it on store. These are represented in IR by a load of a
shorter vector followed by a zext/sext, and conversely, a trunc
followed by a short store. Existing ISel patterns already recognize
those combinations and turn them into the right MVE instructions.

The predicated forms of all these instructions are represented in the
same way, except that the ordinary load/store operation is replaced
with the existing intrinsics @llvm.masked.{load,store}. These are
currently only code-generated as predicated MVE load/store
instructions if you give LLVM the `-enable-arm-maskedldst` option; so
I've done that in the LLVM codegen test. When we make that the
default, that option can be removed.

In the Tablegen backend, I've had to add a handful of extra support
features:

* We need to be able to make clang::Address objects out of a
  pointer and an alignment (previously we only needed these when the
  user passed us an existing one).

* We can now specify vector types that aren't 128 bits wide (for use
  in those intermediate values in IR), the parametrized type system
  can make one starting from two existing vector types (using the lane
  count of one and the element type of the other).

* I've added support for code generation of pointer casts, and for
  specifying LLVM types as operands to IRBuilder operations (for zext
  and sext, though I think they'll come in useful again).

* Now not all IR construction operations need to be specified as
  Builder.CreateFoo; some don't involve a Builder at all, and one
  passes it as a parameter to a tiny static helper function in
  CGBuiltin.cpp.

Reviewers: ostannard, MarkMurrayARM, dmgreen

Subscribers: kristof.beyls, cfe-commits, llvm-commits

Tags: #clang, #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70088

These are really just placeholders that use approximately the right resources - once we have CPUs scheduler models that support these instructions they will need revisiting.

In the meantime this means that all instructions have a class of some kind., meaning models can be more easily flagged as complete.

Summary:
[libomptarget] Move supporti.h to support.cu
Reimplementation of D69652, without the unity build and refactors.
Will need a clean build of libomptarget as the cmakelists changed.

Reviewers: ABataev, jdoerfert

Reviewed By: jdoerfert

Subscribers: mgorny, jfb, openmp-commits

Tags: #openmp

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70131