- Aug 29, 2019
-
-
Hans Wennborg authored
llvm-svn: 370352
-
Hans Wennborg authored
llvm-svn: 370346
-
Hans Wennborg authored
llvm-svn: 370344
-
Hans Wennborg authored
llvm-svn: 370342
-
Hans Wennborg authored
llvm-svn: 370318
-
Hans Wennborg authored
------------------------------------------------------------------------ r369184 | maskray | 2019-08-17 08:28:03 +0200 (Sat, 17 Aug 2019) | 9 lines [ELF][PPC] Fix getRelExpr for R_PPC64_REL16_HI Fixes https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/640 R_PPC64_REL16_HI was incorrectly computed as an R_ABS relocation. rLLD368964 made it a linker failure. Change it to use R_PC to fix the failures. Add ppc64-reloc-rel.s for these R_PPC64_REL* tests. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ llvm-svn: 370313
-
Hans Wennborg authored
------------------------------------------------------------------------ r368964 | maskray | 2019-08-15 07:22:23 +0200 (Thu, 15 Aug 2019) | 11 lines [ELF][PPC] Improve error message for unknown relocations Like rLLD354040. Previously, for unrecognized relocation types, in -no-pie mode: foo.o: unrecognized reloc 256 In -pie/-shared mode: error: can't create dynamic relocation R_PPC_xxx against symbol: yyy in readonly segment ------------------------------------------------------------------------ llvm-svn: 370312
-
Hans Wennborg authored
------------------------------------------------------------------------ r370271 | tstellar | 2019-08-29 00:59:04 +0200 (Thu, 29 Aug 2019) | 6 lines [LLVM-C] Fix omission of INSTALL_WITH_TOOLCHAIN to llvm_add_library() Due to a misstake with r365902 that tried to simplify the install with toolchain logic LLVM-C.dll was no longer being installed. Patch By: Jakob Bornecrantz ------------------------------------------------------------------------ llvm-svn: 370306
-
- Aug 28, 2019
-
-
Hans Wennborg authored
------------------------------------------------------------------------ r370035 | devnexen | 2019-08-27 12:04:03 +0200 (Tue, 27 Aug 2019) | 7 lines [ReleaseNotes] MemorySanitizer support of ASLR on FreeBSD Reviewers: sylvestre.ledru, kcc Reviewed By: sylvestre.ledru Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66792 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ llvm-svn: 370213
-
Hans Wennborg authored
------------------------------------------------------------------------ r370204 | hans | 2019-08-28 15:55:10 +0200 (Wed, 28 Aug 2019) | 6 lines [SelectionDAG] Don't generate libcalls for wide shifts on Windows (PR42711) Neither libgcc or compiler-rt are usually used on Windows, so these functions can't be called. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66880 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ llvm-svn: 370205
-
Hans Wennborg authored
------------------------------------------------------------------------ r369886 | bjope | 2019-08-26 11:29:53 +0200 (Mon, 26 Aug 2019) | 23 lines [LoopUnroll] Handle certain PHIs in full unrolling properly Summary: When reconstructing the CFG of the loop after unrolling, LoopUnroll could in some cases remove the phi operands of loop-carried values instead of preserving them, resulting in undef phi values after loop unrolling. When doing this reconstruction, avoid removing incoming phi values for phis in the successor blocks if the successor is the block we are jumping to anyway. Patch-by: ebevhan Reviewers: fhahn, efriedma Reviewed By: fhahn Subscribers: bjope, lebedev.ri, zzheng, dmgreen, llvm-commits Tags: #llvm Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66334 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ llvm-svn: 370182
-
Hans Wennborg authored
------------------------------------------------------------------------ r370073 | lenary | 2019-08-27 17:41:16 +0200 (Tue, 27 Aug 2019) | 13 lines [RISCV] Set MaxAtomicInlineWidth and MaxAtomicPromoteWidth for RV32/RV64 targets with atomics Summary: This ensures that libcalls aren't generated when the target supports atomics. Atomics aren't in the base RV32I/RV64I instruction sets, so MaxAtomicInlineWidth and MaxAtomicPromoteWidth are set only when the atomics extension is being targeted. This must be done in setMaxAtomicWidth, as this should be done after handleTargetFeatures has been called. Reviewers: jfb, jyknight, wmi, asb Reviewed By: asb Subscribers: pzheng, MaskRay, s.egerton, lenary, dexonsmith, psnobl, benna, Jim, JohnLLVM, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, jrtc27, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, lewis-revill, cfe-commits Tags: #clang Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57450 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ llvm-svn: 370181
-
Hans Wennborg authored
------------------------------------------------------------------------ r370176 | hans | 2019-08-28 11:21:56 +0200 (Wed, 28 Aug 2019) | 15 lines [LLVM-C] Fix ByVal Attribute crashing With the introduction of the typed byval attribute change there was no way that the LLVM-C API could create the correct class Attribute. If a program that uses the C API creates a ByVal attribute and annotates a function with that attribute LLVM will crash when it assembles or write that module containing the function out as bitcode. This change is a minimal fix to at least allow code to work, this is because the byval change is on the 9.0 and I don't want to introduce new LLVM-C API this late in the release cycle. By Jakob Bornecrantz! Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66144 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ llvm-svn: 370178
-
Hans Wennborg authored
llvm-svn: 370167
-
Hans Wennborg authored
By Kristóf Umann! Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66765 llvm-svn: 370166
-
Hans Wennborg authored
llvm-svn: 370077
-
Hans Wennborg authored
By Alex Bradbury! llvm-svn: 370076
-
- Aug 27, 2019
-
-
Hans Wennborg authored
By Lei Huang! llvm-svn: 370065
-
Hans Wennborg authored
------------------------------------------------------------------------ r370036 | tnorthover | 2019-08-27 12:21:11 +0200 (Tue, 27 Aug 2019) | 8 lines AArch64: avoid creating cycle in DAG for post-increment NEON ops. Inserting a value into Visited has the effect of terminating a search for predecessors if that node is seen. This is legitimate for the base address, and acts as a slight performance optimization, but the vector-building node can be paert of a legitimate cycle so we shouldn't stop searching there. PR43056. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ llvm-svn: 370063
-
Hans Wennborg authored
------------------------------------------------------------------------ r369834 | rsmith | 2019-08-24 04:30:00 +0200 (Sat, 24 Aug 2019) | 8 lines PR42513: Enter the proper DeclContext before substituting into an default template argument expression. We already did this for type template parameters and template template parameters, but apparently forgot to do so for non-type template parameters. This causes the substituted default argument expression to be substituted in the proper context, and in particular to properly mark its subexpressions as odr-used. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ llvm-svn: 370038
-
Hans Wennborg authored
------------------------------------------------------------------------ r369749 | stulova | 2019-08-23 13:43:49 +0200 (Fri, 23 Aug 2019) | 5 lines [Docs][OpenCL] Several corrections to C++ for OpenCL Differential Revision:https://reviews.llvm.org/D64418 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ llvm-svn: 370031
-
Sam McCall authored
llvm-svn: 370024
-
Hans Wennborg authored
------------------------------------------------------------------------ r369829 | rsmith | 2019-08-24 03:23:57 +0200 (Sat, 24 Aug 2019) | 3 lines PR40674: fix assertion failure if a structured binding declaration has a tuple-like decomposition that produces value-dependent reference bindings. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ llvm-svn: 369921
-
- Aug 26, 2019
-
-
Hans Wennborg authored
llvm-svn: 369913
-
Hans Wennborg authored
From Kristof! llvm-svn: 369912
-
Hans Wennborg authored
------------------------------------------------------------------------ r367115 | jdevlieghere | 2019-07-26 16:26:33 +0200 (Fri, 26 Jul 2019) | 6 lines [CMake] Loosen Python version check and ignore patch version Some versions of macOS report a different patch version for the system provided interpreter and libraries. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65230 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r367125 | jdevlieghere | 2019-07-26 18:15:19 +0200 (Fri, 26 Jul 2019) | 3 lines [CMake] Print Python version on Windows Trying to figure out what's causing the Windows bot to fail. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r367127 | jdevlieghere | 2019-07-26 18:32:49 +0200 (Fri, 26 Jul 2019) | 4 lines [CMake] Fix find_python_libs_windows Exporting PYTHON_INCLUDE_DIR to the Python scope somehow got lost in my last change. Add it back again. This should fix the Windows bot! ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ r367153 | jdevlieghere | 2019-07-26 22:58:10 +0200 (Fri, 26 Jul 2019) | 5 lines [CMake] Print the correct variables This didn't get updated after we decided to set PYTHON_MAJOR_VERSION and PYTHON_MINOR_VERSION in find_python_libs_windows, instead of parsing the variables ourselves. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ llvm-svn: 369903
-
Hans Wennborg authored
------------------------------------------------------------------------ r366447 | jdevlieghere | 2019-07-18 17:17:42 +0200 (Thu, 18 Jul 2019) | 19 lines [CMake] Don't set Python_ADDITIONAL_VERSIONS Until recently, Python_ADDITIONAL_VERSIONS was used to limit LLVM's Python support to 2.7. Now that both LLVM and LLDB both support Python 3, there's no longer a need to put an arbitrary limit on this. However, instead of removing the variable, r365692 expanded the list, which has the (presumably unintentional) side-effect of expression preference for Python 3. Instead, as Michal proposed in the original code review, we should just not set the list at all, and let CMake pick whatever Python interpreter you have in your path. This patch removes the Python_ADDITIONAL_VERSIONS variable in llvm, clang and lld. I've also updated the docs with the default behavior and how to force a different Python version to be used. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64894 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ llvm-svn: 369902
-
Hans Wennborg authored
------------------------------------------------------------------------ r366447 | jdevlieghere | 2019-07-18 17:17:42 +0200 (Thu, 18 Jul 2019) | 19 lines [CMake] Don't set Python_ADDITIONAL_VERSIONS Until recently, Python_ADDITIONAL_VERSIONS was used to limit LLVM's Python support to 2.7. Now that both LLVM and LLDB both support Python 3, there's no longer a need to put an arbitrary limit on this. However, instead of removing the variable, r365692 expanded the list, which has the (presumably unintentional) side-effect of expression preference for Python 3. Instead, as Michal proposed in the original code review, we should just not set the list at all, and let CMake pick whatever Python interpreter you have in your path. This patch removes the Python_ADDITIONAL_VERSIONS variable in llvm, clang and lld. I've also updated the docs with the default behavior and how to force a different Python version to be used. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64894 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ llvm-svn: 369901
-
Hans Wennborg authored
------------------------------------------------------------------------ r366447 | jdevlieghere | 2019-07-18 17:17:42 +0200 (Thu, 18 Jul 2019) | 19 lines [CMake] Don't set Python_ADDITIONAL_VERSIONS Until recently, Python_ADDITIONAL_VERSIONS was used to limit LLVM's Python support to 2.7. Now that both LLVM and LLDB both support Python 3, there's no longer a need to put an arbitrary limit on this. However, instead of removing the variable, r365692 expanded the list, which has the (presumably unintentional) side-effect of expression preference for Python 3. Instead, as Michal proposed in the original code review, we should just not set the list at all, and let CMake pick whatever Python interpreter you have in your path. This patch removes the Python_ADDITIONAL_VERSIONS variable in llvm, clang and lld. I've also updated the docs with the default behavior and how to force a different Python version to be used. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64894 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ llvm-svn: 369900
-
Hans Wennborg authored
------------------------------------------------------------------------ r366447 | jdevlieghere | 2019-07-18 17:17:42 +0200 (Thu, 18 Jul 2019) | 19 lines [CMake] Don't set Python_ADDITIONAL_VERSIONS Until recently, Python_ADDITIONAL_VERSIONS was used to limit LLVM's Python support to 2.7. Now that both LLVM and LLDB both support Python 3, there's no longer a need to put an arbitrary limit on this. However, instead of removing the variable, r365692 expanded the list, which has the (presumably unintentional) side-effect of expression preference for Python 3. Instead, as Michal proposed in the original code review, we should just not set the list at all, and let CMake pick whatever Python interpreter you have in your path. This patch removes the Python_ADDITIONAL_VERSIONS variable in llvm, clang and lld. I've also updated the docs with the default behavior and how to force a different Python version to be used. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64894 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ llvm-svn: 369899
-
Hans Wennborg authored
------------------------------------------------------------------------ r369364 | miyuki | 2019-08-20 12:19:55 +0200 (Tue, 20 Aug 2019) | 6 lines [libcxx] Fix build breakage on mips Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43011 caused by https://reviews.llvm.org/D63284. Committing as obvious. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ llvm-svn: 369898
-
Hans Wennborg authored
llvm-svn: 369897
-
Hans Wennborg authored
By Amy Huang! llvm-svn: 369896
-
Hans Wennborg authored
By Aras Pranckevicius! llvm-svn: 369895
-
Hans Wennborg authored
------------------------------------------------------------------------ r369694 | akhuang | 2019-08-22 21:40:07 +0200 (Thu, 22 Aug 2019) | 1 line [COFF] Add libcall symbols to the link when LTO is being used ------------------------------------------------------------------------ llvm-svn: 369883
-
Hans Wennborg authored
------------------------------------------------------------------------ r366836 | nico | 2019-07-23 21:00:01 +0200 (Tue, 23 Jul 2019) | 24 lines ld.lld: Demangle symbols from archives in diagnostics This ports r366573 from COFF to ELF. There are now to toString(Archive::Symbol), one doing MSVC demangling in COFF and one doing Itanium demangling in ELF, so rename these two to toCOFFString() and to toELFString() to not get a duplicate symbol. Nothing ever passes a raw Archive::Symbol to CHECK(), so these not being part of the normal toString() machinery seems ok. There are two code paths in the ELF linker that emits this type of diagnostic: 1. The "normal" one in InputFiles.cpp. This is covered by the tweaked test. 2. An additional one that's only used for libcalls if there's at least one bitcode in the link, and if the libcall symbol is lazy, and lazily loaded from an archive (i.e. not from a lazy .o file). (This code path was added in r339301.) Since all libcall names so far are C symbols and never mangled, the change there is not observable and hence not covered by tests. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65095 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ llvm-svn: 369882
-
Hans Wennborg authored
------------------------------------------------------------------------ r366573 | nico | 2019-07-19 15:29:10 +0200 (Fri, 19 Jul 2019) | 6 lines lld-link: Demangle symbols from archives in diagnostics Also add test coverage for thin archives (which are the only way I could come up with to test at least some of the diagnostic changes). Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64927 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ llvm-svn: 369881
-
Hans Wennborg authored
------------------------------------------------------------------------ r369349 | ibiryukov | 2019-08-20 10:54:30 +0200 (Tue, 20 Aug 2019) | 36 lines [clangd] Skip function bodies inside processed files while indexing Summary: This significantly improves performance of background indexing. We do not collect references and declarations inside the processed files, so this does not affect the final indexing results. The idea is borrowed from libclang, which has a similar optimization in its indexing functionality. Measurements show a nice decrease in indexing time, up to ~40% for building the whole index. These are not proper benchmarks, so one should not rely on these results too much. 1. Rebuilding the whole index for LLVM: - Before. Total time: 14m58s. ./bin/clangd -pch-storage=memory < ./clangd.input 23917.67s user 515.86s system 2718% cpu 14:58.68 total - After. Total time: 8m41s. ./bin/clangd -pch-storage=memory < ./clangd.input 13627.29s user 288.10s system 2672% cpu 8:40.67 total 2. Rebuilding index after removing shards matching '*clangd*' (case-insensitively): - Before. Total time: 30s. ./bin/clangd -pch-storage=memory < ./clangd.input 130.94s user 6.82s system 452% cpu 30.423 total - After. Total time: 26s. ./bin/clangd -pch-storage=memory < ./clangd.input 80.51s user 5.40s system 333% cpu 25.777 total Reviewers: kadircet, sammccall Reviewed By: kadircet Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits Tags: #clang Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66226 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ llvm-svn: 369879
-
- Aug 23, 2019
-
-
Anastasia Stulova authored
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66294 llvm-svn: 369758
-
Nico Weber authored
llvm-svn: 369753
-