This patch modifies the PluginInterface to define functions for initializing
and deinitializing GenericPluginTy instances instead of using the constructor
and destructor. This way, we can return errors from these functions. Also, it
defines some functions that each plugin should implement for creating
plugin-specific objects.

This patch prepares the PluginInterface for the new AMDGPU NextGen plugin.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138625

List of fixes:
  - omptarget_device_environment symbol is not mandatory in device images
  - Do not synchronize in ~AsyncInfoWrapperTy() if the async info's queue is null
  - GenericDeviceResourceRef's create() and destroy() require the device as parameter

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138619

The OpenMP target's NextGen plugins retrieve symbol information in the ELF image
(i.e., address and size) through the ELF section and ELF symbol objects. However,
the images of CUDA programs compute the address differently from the images of
AMDGPU programs:

  - Address for CUDA symbols: image begin + section's offset + symbol's st_value
  - Address for AMDGPU symbols: image + begin + symbol's st_value

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138604

When a character-valued function is passed as an actual argument, and both
the actual function and the dummy argument have explicit result lengths, take them
into account when testing for compatibility.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139129

and change a few referenced Basic and llvm/lib/WindowsDriver API

Init captures added in processBlock() to avoid capturing structured bindings,
which caused the build problems (with clang).

RISCV has this disabled for now until problems relating to post RA pseudo
expansions are resolved.

This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated.  The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716

This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated.  The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716

This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated.  The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716

This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated.  The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716

This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated.  The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716

This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated.  The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716

This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated.  The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716

This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated.  The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716

This test crashes Semantics (infinite recursion?) only when built with MSVC;
need to investigate further, disabling test for now.

This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated.  The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716

This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated.  The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716

This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated.  The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.

This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:

https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716

Standard Fortran allows type-bound procedure bindings to only
be called, and disallows them from being used in other contexts
where a procedure name can be: as the target of a procedure pointer
assignment statement, and as an actual argument that corresponds
to a dummy procedure.  So long as the interfaces match, there's
no good reason for these uses to be errors, and there some obvious
use cases in polymorphic programming.  So emit portability warnings
rather than errors, and document this usage as an extension.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139127

Type-bound generics like operator(+) and assignment(=) need to not be
PRIVATE if they are used outside the module in which they are declared.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139123

In a derived type definition, a type bound procedure declaration
statement with neither interface nor attributes is required by constraint
C768 to have the optional "::" between the PROCEDURE keyword and the
bindings if any binding has a renaming with "=>".  The colons are
not actually necessary for a correct and unambiguous parse, so
emit a warning when they are missing.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139065

This enabled the select optimize patch for ARM Out of order AArch64
cores. It is trying to solve a problem that is difficult for the
compiler to fix. The criteria for when a csel is better or worse than a
branch depends heavily on whether the branch is well predicted and the
amount of ILP in the loop (as well as other criteria like the core in
question and the relative performance of the branch predictor).  The
pass seems to do a decent job though, with the inner loop heuristics
being well implemented and doing a better job than I had expected in
general, even without PGO information.

I've been doing quite a bit of benchmarking. The headline numbers are
these for SPEC2017 on a Neoverse N1:
  500.perlbench_r   -0.12%
  502.gcc_r         0.02%
  505.mcf_r         6.02%
  520.omnetpp_r     0.32%
  523.xalancbmk_r   0.20%
  525.x264_r        0.02%
  531.deepsjeng_r   0.00%
  541.leela_r       -0.09%
  548.exchange2_r   0.00%
  557.xz_r          -0.20%

Running benchmarks with a combination of the llvm-test-suite plus
several versions of SPEC gave between a 0.2% and 0.4% geomean
improvement depending on the core/run. The instruction count went down
by 0.1% too, which is a good sign, but the results can be a little
noisy.  Some issues from other benchmarks I had ran were improved in
rGca78b560. In summary well predicted
branches will see in improvement, badly predicted branches may get
worse, and on average performance seems to be a little better overall.

This patch enables the pass for AArch64 under -O3 for cores that will
benefit for it. i.e. not in-order cores that do not fit into the "Assume
infinite resources that allow to fully exploit the available
instruction-level parallelism" cost model. It uses a subtarget feature
for specifying when the pass will be enabled, which I have enabled under
cpu=generic as the performance increases for out of order cores seems
larger than any decreases for inorder, which were minor.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138990

When checking the specific procedures of a generic interface for a
match against a given set of actual arguments, be sure to not match
a function against a subroutine call or vice versa.  (We generally
catch and warn about attempts to declare mixed interfaces, but they
are usually conforming and can be inadvertently created when generics
are merged due to USE and host association.)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139059

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D138746

This reverts commit d62480c1.
Added test fails, see https://reviews.llvm.org/D138469#3968539

At least on macOS with zsh, the test failed with

    line 1: syntax error near unexpected token `&'

previously.

Improve type conversion error propagation/failure during LLVM lowering.

BEFORE

```
llvm-mlir/mlir/lib/Conversion/LLVMCommon/TypeConverter.cpp:304: SmallVector<mlir::Type, 5> mlir::LLVMTypeConverter::getMemRefDescriptorFields(mlir::MemRefType, bool): Assertion `isStrided(type) && "Non-strided layout maps must have been normalized away"' failed.
PLEASE submit a bug report to https://bugs.llvm.org/ and include the crash backtrace.
Stack dump:
...
```

AFTER
```
<unknown>:0: error: integer overflow during size computation
<unknown>:0: error: Conversion to strided form failed either due to non-strided layout maps (which should have been normalized away) or other reasons
<unknown>:0: error: failed to legalize operation 'gpu.func' that was explicitly marked illegal
<unknown>:0: note: see current operation:
"gpu.func"() ( {
...
```

Reviewed By: ftynse

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139072

I don't see the point of disallowing copying an aggregate, and C++20
makes aggregate initializing a class with a deleted copy ctor
ill-formed.

This patch fixes a misspelt CHECK-LABEL in tosa-to-tensor.mlir.

Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <r@artagnon.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D139085