- Feb 09, 2016
-
-
Zachary Turner authored
This removes the following decorators: * skipIfI386 * expectedFailureI386 * expectedFailurex86_64 * skipIfArch * skipUnlessArch * skipUnlessI386 And other related decorators. All code using those decorators is updated to use expectedFailureAll and skipIf llvm-svn: 260178
-
Zachary Turner authored
llvm-svn: 260177
-
Zachary Turner authored
Convert everything over to using skipIf. llvm-svn: 260176
-
Evgeniy Stepanov authored
llvm-svn: 260175
-
Wei Mi authored
IndVarSimplify assumes scAddRecExpr to be expanded in literal form instead of canonical form by calling disableCanonicalMode after it creates SCEVExpander. When CanonicalMode is disabled, SCEVExpander::expand should always return PHI node for scAddRecExpr. r259736 broke the assumption. The fix is to let SCEVExpander::expand skip the reuse Value logic if CanonicalMode is false. In addition, Besides IndVarSimplify, LSR pass also calls disableCanonicalMode before doing rewrite. We can remove the original check of LSRMode in reuse Value logic and use CanonicalMode instead. llvm-svn: 260174
-
Davide Italiano authored
llvm-svn: 260173
-
Eric Fiselier authored
llvm-svn: 260172
-
Rong Xu authored
r260146 | xur | 2016-02-08 13:07:46 -0800 (Mon, 08 Feb 2016) | 13 lines [PGO] Differentiate Clang instrumentation and IR level instrumentation profiles llvm-svn: 260170
-
Michael Zolotukhin authored
Summary: Unrolling Analyzer is already pretty complicated, and it becomes harder and harder to exercise it with usual IR tests, as with them we can only check the final decision: whether the loop is unrolled or not. This change factors this framework out from LoopUnrollPass to analyses, which allows to use unit tests. The change itself is supposed to be NFC, except adding a couple of tests. I plan to add more tests as I add new functionality and find/fix bugs. Reviewers: chandlerc, hfinkel, sanjoy Subscribers: zzheng, sanjoy, llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16623 llvm-svn: 260169
-
Simon Pilgrim authored
As discussed on PR26491, this patch adds support for lowering v4f32 shuffles to the MOVLHPS/MOVHLPS instructions. It also adds support for memory folding with their MOVLPS/MOVHPS load equivalents. This first patch only really helps SSE1 targets as SSE2+ targets will widen the shuffle mask and use v2f64 equivalents (although they still combine to MOVLHPS/MOVHLPS for v2f64 splats). This will have to be addressed in a future patch, most likely when we add support for binary target shuffle combines. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16956 llvm-svn: 260168
-
Evgeniy Stepanov authored
llvm-svn: 260167
-
Davide Italiano authored
llvm-svn: 260166
-
Evgeniy Stepanov authored
llvm-svn: 260165
-
Andrew Kaylor authored
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16831 llvm-svn: 260164
-
Evgeniy Stepanov authored
llvm-svn: 260163
-
Justin Bogner authored
In order for recent gcov versions to read the coverage data, you have to use UseCfgChecksum=true and FunctionNamesInData=false options for coverage profiling pass. This is because gcov is expecting the function section in .gcda to be exactly 3 words in size, containing ident and two checksums. While llvm-cov is compatible with UseCfgChecksum=true, it always expects a function name in .gcda function sections (it's not compatible with FunctionNamesInData=false). Thus it's currently impossible to generate one set of coverage files that works with both gcov and llvm-cov. This change fixes the reading of coverage information to only read the function name if it's present. Patch by Arseny Kapoulkine. Thanks! llvm-svn: 260162
-
Xinliang David Li authored
llvm-svn: 260161
-
Ekaterina Romanova authored
This patch adds doxygen comments for all the intrinsincs in the header file pmmintrin.h. The doxygen comments are automatically generated based on Sony's intrinsics document. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16913 llvm-svn: 260160
-
Nico Weber authored
For an explicit specialization, we first build a FunctionDecl, and then we call SubstDecl() on it to build a second FunctionDecl, which has the first FunctionDecl as canonical decl. The address of an explicit specialization of function template used to be the canonical decl of the FunctionDecl. This is different from all the other DeduceTemplateArguments() calls in SemaOverload, and since the canonical decl isn't visited by ParentMap while the redecl is, it also made ParentMap assert when computing the parent of a address-of-explicit-specialization-fun-template. To fix, remove the getCanonicalDecl() call. No behavior difference for clang, but it fixes an assert in ParentMap (which is e.g. used by libTooling). llvm-svn: 260159
-
Nathan Wilson authored
because the information is now stored in TemplateDecl. llvm-svn: 260155
-
Justin Bogner authored
Apparently option is for bools and cmake-gui will display this strangely with option. Pointed out by edward-san - thanks! llvm-svn: 260154
-
Pete Cooper authored
These includes were before the #ifndef/#define guards. Moving them to where they should be. llvm-svn: 260153
-
Dan Gohman authored
llvm-svn: 260152
-
Sanjay Patel authored
llvm-svn: 260151
-
Rong Xu authored
Sync InstrProfData.inc with the one in llvm. llvm-svn: 260148
-
George Burgess IV authored
Patch by Michael Stapelberg. llvm-svn: 260147
-
Rong Xu authored
This patch uses one bit in profile version to differentiate Clang instrumentation and IR level instrumentation profiles. PGOInstrumenation generates a COMDAT variable __llvm_profile_raw_version so that the compiler runtime can set the right profile kind. PGOInstrumenation now checks this bit to make sure it's an IR level instrumentation profile. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15540 llvm-svn: 260146
-
Sanjay Patel authored
Another opportunity to reduce masked stores: in D16691, we decided not to attempt the 'one mask element is set' transform in InstCombine, but this should be a win for any AVX machine. Code comments note that this transform could be extended for other targets / cases. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16828 llvm-svn: 260145
-
Justin Bogner authored
Mehdi suggested in a review of r259766 that it's also useful to easily set the type of LTO. Augment the cmake variable to support that. llvm-svn: 260143
-
Xinliang David Li authored
llvm-svn: 260142
-
Xinliang David Li authored
llvm-svn: 260138
-
Tom Stellard authored
Summary: We will hit this once we have enabled uniform branches. The smrd-vccz-bug.ll test will be added with the uniform branch commit. Reviewers: mareko, arsenm Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16725 llvm-svn: 260137
-
Hans Wennborg authored
llvm-svn: 260136
-
Zachary Turner authored
* Change the `not_in` function to be called `no_match`. This makes it clear that keyword arguments can be more than just lists. * Change the name of `_check_list_or_lambda` to `_match_decorator_property`. Again clarifying that decorator params are not always lists. * Always use a regex match when matching strings. This allows automatic support for regex matching on all decorator properties. Also support compiled regex values. * Fix a bug in the compiler check used by _decorateTest. The two arguments were reversed, the condition was always wrong. * Change one test that uses skipUnlessArch to use skipIf, to demonstrate that skipIf can now handle more scenarios. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16938 llvm-svn: 260135
-
Zachary Turner authored
expectedFailureWindows is equivalent to using the general expectedFailureAll decorator with oslist="windows". Additionally, by moving towards these common decorators we can solve the issue of having to support decorators that can be called with or without arguments. Once all decorators are always called with arguments, and this is enforced by design (because you can't specify the condition you're decorating for without passing an argument) the implementation of the decorators can become much simpler Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16936 llvm-svn: 260134
-
Hans Wennborg authored
This matches GCC and MSVC's behaviour, and saves on code size. We were already not extending i1 return values on x86_64 after r127766. This takes that patch further by applying it to x86 target as well, and also for i8 and i16. The ABI docs have been unclear about the required behaviour here. The new i386 psABI [1] clearly states (Table 2.4, page 14) that i1, i8, and i16 return vales do not need to be extended beyond 8 bits. The x86_64 ABI doc is being updated to say the same [2]. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16907 [1]. https://01.org/sites/default/files/file_attach/intel386-psabi-1.0.pdf [2]. https://groups.google.com/d/msg/x86-64-abi/E8O33onbnGQ/_RFWw_ixDQAJ llvm-svn: 260133
-
Kostya Serebryany authored
llvm-svn: 260132
-
Tim Northover authored
The accumulator in multiply-and-subtract instructions is actually subtracted *from* so these patterns were computing the wrong value. llvm-svn: 260131
-
Sanjay Patel authored
llvm-svn: 260130
-
Vedant Kumar authored
When handling 'if' statements, we crash if the condition and the consequent branch are spanned by a single macro expansion. The crash occurs because of a sanity 'reset' in popRegions(): if an expansion exactly spans an entire region, we set MostRecentLocation to the start of the expansion (its 'include location'). This ensures we don't handleFileExit() ourselves out of the expansion before we're done processing all of the regions within it. This is tested in test/CoverageMapping/macro-expressions.c. This causes a problem when an expansion spans both the condition and the consequent branch of an 'if' statement. MostRecentLocation is updated to the start of the 'if' statement in popRegions(), so the file for the expansion isn't exited by the time we're done handling the statement. We then crash with 'fatal: File exit not handled before popRegions'. The fix for this is to detect these kinds of expansions, and conservatively update MostRecentLocation to the end of expansion region containing the conditional. I've added tests to make sure we don't have the same problem with other kinds of statements. rdar://problem/23630316 Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16934 llvm-svn: 260129
-