missed in his previous revert.

llvm-svn: 121712

llvm-svn: 121711

In Thumb2, direct branches can be encoded as either a "short" conditional branch with a null predicate, or
as a "long" direct branch.  While the mnemonics are the same, they encode the branch offset differently, and
the Darwin assembler appears to prefer the "long" form for direct branches.  Thus, in the name of bitwise
equivalence, provide encoding and fixup support for it.

llvm-svn: 121710

llvm-svn: 121709

llvm-svn: 121708

matching the source line number displayed.

llvm-svn: 121706

llvm-svn: 121705

Fixed a crasher where when a ProcessGDBRemote class was being destroyed, it would eventually destroy the dynamic loader (when the lldb_private::Process::m_dynamic_loader_ap destroys itself in the object member destructor chain). The dynamic loader was calling a pure virtual method in Process which was causing a crash. The quick fix is to reset the auto pointer in the ProcessGDBRemote destructor when  ProcessGDBRemote is still a valid object with all its pure virtual functions intact.

llvm-svn: 121704

llvm-svn: 121697

when the wider type is legal.  This allows us to compile:

define zeroext i16 @test1(i16 zeroext %x) nounwind {
entry:
	%div = udiv i16 %x, 33
	ret i16 %div
}

into:

test1:                                  # @test1
	movzwl	4(%esp), %eax
	imull	$63551, %eax, %eax      # imm = 0xF83F
	shrl	$21, %eax
	ret

instead of:

test1:                                  # @test1
        movw    $-1985, %ax             # imm = 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFF83F
        mulw    4(%esp)
        andl    $65504, %edx            # imm = 0xFFE0
        movl    %edx, %eax
        shrl    $5, %eax
        ret

Implementing rdar://8760399 and example #4 from:
http://blog.regehr.org/archives/320

We should implement the same thing for [su]mul_hilo, but I don't
have immediate plans to do this.

llvm-svn: 121696

'and' case.

llvm-svn: 121695

llvm-svn: 121694

I can track down a miscompile.  This should bring the buildbots
back to life

llvm-svn: 121693

would return true if the initializer pointer union had *any* non-null
pointer in it, even if the pointer wasn't one that would actually be
returned via getInit(). This makes it more accurately model the logic of
'getInit() != NULL'.

This still isn't completely satisfying. From a principled stance,
I suspect we should make hasInit() and getInit() *always* return false
and NULL (resp.) for ParmVarDecl. We shouldn't at the API level treat
initializers and default arguments as the same thing.

llvm-svn: 121692

for each constant pool entry.  Using WriteTypeSymbolic here takes time
proportional to the size of the module, for each constant pool entry.

This speeds up -verbose-asm llc on 252.eon (a random testcase at my disposal)
from 4.4s to 2.137s.  llc takes 2.11s with asm-verbose off, so this is now a
pretty reasonable cost for verbose comments.

llvm-svn: 121691

when simplifying, allowing them to be eagerly turned into switches.  This
is the last step required to get "Example 7" from this blog post:
http://blog.regehr.org/archives/320

On X86, we now generate this machine code, which (to my eye) seems better
than the ICC generated code:

_crud:                                  ## @crud
## BB#0:                                ## %entry
	cmpb	$33, %dil
	jb	LBB0_4
## BB#1:                                ## %switch.early.test
	addb	$-34, %dil
	cmpb	$58, %dil
	ja	LBB0_3
## BB#2:                                ## %switch.early.test
	movzbl	%dil, %eax
	movabsq	$288230376537592865, %rcx ## imm = 0x400000017001421
	btq	%rax, %rcx
	jb	LBB0_4
LBB0_3:                                 ## %lor.rhs
	xorl	%eax, %eax
	ret
LBB0_4:                                 ## %lor.end
	movl	$1, %eax
	ret

llvm-svn: 121690

llvm-svn: 121689

per terminator kind.

llvm-svn: 121688

llvm-svn: 121687

doing a cfg search for every block simplified.

llvm-svn: 121686

llvm-svn: 121685

llvm-svn: 121684

getSinglePredecessor to simplify code.

llvm-svn: 121683

llvm-svn: 121682

llvm-svn: 121681

'or sequence' that it doesn't understand.  This allows us to optimize
something insane like this:

int crud (unsigned char c, unsigned x)
 {
   if(((((((((( (int) c <= 32 ||
                    (int) c == 46) || (int) c == 44)
                  || (int) c == 58) || (int) c == 59) || (int) c == 60)
               || (int) c == 62) || (int) c == 34) || (int) c == 92)
            || (int) c == 39) != 0)
     foo();
 }

into:

define i32 @crud(i8 zeroext %c, i32 %x) nounwind ssp noredzone {
entry:
  %cmp = icmp ult i8 %c, 33
  br i1 %cmp, label %if.then, label %switch.early.test

switch.early.test:                                ; preds = %entry
  switch i8 %c, label %if.end [
    i8 39, label %if.then
    i8 44, label %if.then
    i8 58, label %if.then
    i8 59, label %if.then
    i8 60, label %if.then
    i8 62, label %if.then
    i8 46, label %if.then
    i8 92, label %if.then
    i8 34, label %if.then
  ]

by pulling the < comparison out ahead of the newly formed switch.

llvm-svn: 121680

llvm-svn: 121679

llvm-svn: 121678

llvm-svn: 121677

llvm-svn: 121676

llvm-svn: 121675

bootstrap buildbot tripped over.

llvm-svn: 121674

llvm-svn: 121673

llvm-svn: 121672

or'd conditions.  Previously we'd compile something like this:

int crud (unsigned char c) {
   return c == 62 || c == 34 || c == 92;
}

into:

  switch i8 %c, label %lor.rhs [
    i8 62, label %lor.end
    i8 34, label %lor.end
  ]

lor.rhs:                                          ; preds = %entry
  %cmp8 = icmp eq i8 %c, 92
  br label %lor.end

lor.end:                                          ; preds = %entry, %entry, %lor.rhs
  %0 = phi i1 [ true, %entry ], [ %cmp8, %lor.rhs ], [ true, %entry ]
  %lor.ext = zext i1 %0 to i32
  ret i32 %lor.ext

which failed to merge the compare-with-92 into the switch.  With this patch
we simplify this all the way to:

  switch i8 %c, label %lor.rhs [
    i8 62, label %lor.end
    i8 34, label %lor.end
    i8 92, label %lor.end
  ]

lor.rhs:                                          ; preds = %entry
  br label %lor.end

lor.end:                                          ; preds = %entry, %entry, %entry, %lor.rhs
  %0 = phi i1 [ true, %entry ], [ false, %lor.rhs ], [ true, %entry ], [ true, %entry ]
  %lor.ext = zext i1 %0 to i32
  ret i32 %lor.ext

which is much better for codegen's switch lowering stuff.  This kicks in 33 times
on 176.gcc (for example) cutting 103 instructions off the generated code.

llvm-svn: 121671

llvm-svn: 121670

llvm-svn: 121669

location in simplifycfg.  In the old days, SimplifyCFG was never run on
the entry block, so we had to scan over all preds of the BB passed into
simplifycfg to do this xform, now we can just check blocks ending with
a condbranch.  This avoids a scan over all preds of every simplified 
block, which should be a significant compile-time perf win on functions
with lots of edges.  No functionality change.

llvm-svn: 121668

llvm-svn: 121667

  class A<bit a, bits<3> x, bits<3> y> {
    bits<3> z;
    let z = !if(a, x, y);
  }

The variable z will get the value of x when 'a' is 1 and 'y' when a is '0'.

llvm-svn: 121666