[InstCombine] freeze operand in sdiv expansion

As discussed in issue #37809, this transform is not safe
if the input is an undefined value.

This is similar to a recent change for urem:
d428f09b

There is no difference in codegen on the basic examples,
but this could lead to regressions. We may need to
improve freeze analysis or lowering if that happens.

Presumably, in real cases that are similar to the tests
where a subsequent transform removes the select, we
will also be able to remove the freeze by seeing that
the parameter has 'noundef'.