[Sema] Correct nothrow inherited by noexcept
As reported in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33235, a noexcept function was unable to inherit from a nothrow defaulted constructor. Attribute "nothrow" is supposed to be semantically identical to noexcept, and in fact, a number of other places in the code treat them identically. This patch simply checks the RecordDecl for the correct attribute in the case where no other exception specifier was set. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38209 llvm-svn: 314462
parent
c372e15c
Please register or sign in to comment