[CVP} Replace SExt with ZExt if the input is known-non-negative

Summary:
zero-extension is far more friendly for further analysis.
While this doesn't directly help with the shift-by-signext problem, this is not unrelated.

This has the following effect on test-suite (numbers collected after the finish of middle-end module pass manager):
| Statistic                            |     old |     new | delta | percent change |
| correlated-value-propagation.NumSExt |       0 |    6026 |  6026 |   +100.00%     |
| instcount.NumAddInst                 |  272860 |  271283 | -1577 |     -0.58%     |
| instcount.NumAllocaInst              |   27227 |   27226 | -1    |      0.00%     |
| instcount.NumAndInst                 |   63502 |   63320 | -182  |     -0.29%     |
| instcount.NumAShrInst                |   13498 |   13407 | -91   |     -0.67%     |
| instcount.NumAtomicCmpXchgInst       |    1159 |    1159 |  0    |      0.00%     |
| instcount.NumAtomicRMWInst           |    5036 |    5036 |  0    |      0.00%...