[X86]Add NO_REVERSE attribute to X86 RMW instrs in memfold table (#67288)
X86 don't want to unfold RMW instrs to 1 load + 1 op + 1 store, because RMW could save code size and benefit RA when reg pressure is high. And from all the call position analysis, we could find we didn't unfold RMW in current code.
parent
76a5602f
Please register or sign in to comment