[RISC-V] Bad immediate value for Zcmp instructions with E extension (#84925)
When we are using the Zcmp extension together with the E extension in 32-bit mode and we need to spill both callee-saved registers as well as needing a couple of 32-bit stack slots, we emit a meaningless stack adjustment with cm.push/cm.popret. Furthermore this leads to the stack slot for the ra being clobbered so control returns to a random location. This is just a pre-commit test so that the PR for the fix shows the difference in code generation.
parent
beba307c
Please register or sign in to comment