1. Dec 14, 2021
  2. Dec 13, 2021
  3. Dec 11, 2021
  4. Dec 10, 2021
  5. Dec 09, 2021
  6. Dec 08, 2021
  7. Dec 07, 2021
  8. Dec 04, 2021
  9. Dec 03, 2021
  10. Dec 02, 2021
  11. Dec 01, 2021
  12. Nov 30, 2021
  13. Nov 26, 2021
    • Matthew Auld's avatar
      drm/i915/gemfs: don't mark huge_opt as static · 3ccadbce
      Matthew Auld authored
      vfs_kernel_mount() modifies the passed in mount options, leaving us with
      "huge", instead of "huge=within_size". Normally this shouldn't matter
      with the usual module load/unload flow, however with the core_hotunplug
      IGT we are hitting the following, when re-probing the memory regions:
      
      i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] Transparent Hugepage mode 'huge'
      tmpfs: Bad value for 'huge'
      [drm] Unable to create a private tmpfs mount, hugepage support will be disabled(-22).
      
      References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/4651
      
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
      Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211126110843.2028582-1-matthew.auld@intel.com
      3ccadbce
    • Thomas Hellström's avatar
      drm/i915: Use __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM in the capture code · 8b91cdd4
      Thomas Hellström authored
      
      
      The capture code is typically run entirely in the fence signalling
      critical path. We're about to add lockdep annotation in an upcoming patch
      which reveals a lockdep splat similar to the below one.
      
      Fix the associated potential deadlocks using __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM
      (which is the same as GFP_WAIT, but open-coded for clarity) rather than
      GFP_KERNEL for memory allocation in the capture path. This has the
      potential drawback that capture might fail in situations with memory
      pressure.
      
      [  234.842048] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
      [  234.842050] 5.15.0-rc7+ #20 Tainted: G     U  W
      [  234.842052] ------------------------------------------------------
      [  234.842054] gem_exec_captur/1180 is trying to acquire lock:
      [  234.842056] ffffffffa3e51c00 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __kmalloc+0x4d/0x330
      [  234.842063]
                     but task is already holding lock:
      [  234.842064] ffffffffa3f57620 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: i915_vma_snapshot_resource_pin+0x27/0x30 [i915]
      [  234.842138]
                     which lock already depends on the new lock.
      
      [  234.842140]
                     the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
      [  234.842142]
                     -> #2 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}:
      [  234.842145]        __dma_fence_might_wait+0x41/0xa0
      [  234.842149]        dma_resv_lockdep+0x1dc/0x28f
      [  234.842151]        do_one_initcall+0x58/0x2d0
      [  234.842154]        kernel_init_freeable+0x273/0x2bf
      [  234.842157]        kernel_init+0x16/0x120
      [  234.842160]        ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
      [  234.842163]
                     -> #1 (mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start){+.+.}-{0:0}:
      [  234.842166]        fs_reclaim_acquire+0x6d/0xd0
      [  234.842168]        __kmalloc_node+0x51/0x3a0
      [  234.842171]        alloc_cpumask_var_node+0x1b/0x30
      [  234.842174]        native_smp_prepare_cpus+0xc7/0x292
      [  234.842177]        kernel_init_freeable+0x160/0x2bf
      [  234.842179]        kernel_init+0x16/0x120
      [  234.842181]        ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
      [  234.842184]
                     -> #0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
      [  234.842186]        __lock_acquire+0x1161/0x1dc0
      [  234.842189]        lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0
      [  234.842192]        fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
      [  234.842193]        __kmalloc+0x4d/0x330
      [  234.842196]        i915_vma_coredump_create+0x78/0x5b0 [i915]
      [  234.842253]        intel_engine_coredump_add_vma+0x36/0xe0 [i915]
      [  234.842307]        __i915_gpu_coredump+0x290/0x5e0 [i915]
      [  234.842365]        i915_capture_error_state+0x57/0xa0 [i915]
      [  234.842415]        intel_gt_handle_error+0x348/0x3e0 [i915]
      [  234.842462]        intel_gt_debugfs_reset_store+0x3c/0x90 [i915]
      [  234.842504]        simple_attr_write+0xc1/0xe0
      [  234.842507]        full_proxy_write+0x53/0x80
      [  234.842509]        vfs_write+0xbc/0x350
      [  234.842513]        ksys_write+0x58/0xd0
      [  234.842514]        do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
      [  234.842516]        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
      [  234.842519]
                     other info that might help us debug this:
      
      [  234.842521] Chain exists of:
                       fs_reclaim --> mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start --> dma_fence_map
      
      [  234.842526]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
      
      [  234.842528]        CPU0                    CPU1
      [  234.842529]        ----                    ----
      [  234.842531]   lock(dma_fence_map);
      [  234.842532]                                lock(mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start);
      [  234.842535]                                lock(dma_fence_map);
      [  234.842537]   lock(fs_reclaim);
      [  234.842539]
                      *** DEADLOCK ***
      
      [  234.842540] 4 locks held by gem_exec_captur/1180:
      [  234.842543]  #0: ffff9007812d9460 (sb_writers#17){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0x58/0xd0
      [  234.842547]  #1: ffff900781d9ecb8 (&attr->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: simple_attr_write+0x3a/0xe0
      [  234.842552]  #2: ffffffffc11913a8 (capture_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: i915_capture_error_state+0x1a/0xa0 [i915]
      [  234.842602]  #3: ffffffffa3f57620 (dma_fence_map){++++}-{0:0}, at: i915_vma_snapshot_resource_pin+0x27/0x30 [i915]
      [  234.842656]
                     stack backtrace:
      [  234.842658] CPU: 0 PID: 1180 Comm: gem_exec_captur Tainted: G     U  W         5.15.0-rc7+ #20
      [  234.842661] Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/PRIME B560M-A AC, BIOS 0403 01/26/2021
      [  234.842664] Call Trace:
      [  234.842666]  dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72
      [  234.842669]  check_noncircular+0xde/0x100
      [  234.842672]  ? __lock_acquire+0x3bf/0x1dc0
      [  234.842675]  __lock_acquire+0x1161/0x1dc0
      [  234.842678]  lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0
      [  234.842680]  ? __kmalloc+0x4d/0x330
      [  234.842683]  ? finish_task_switch.isra.0+0xf2/0x360
      [  234.842686]  ? i915_vma_coredump_create+0x78/0x5b0 [i915]
      [  234.842734]  fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa1/0xd0
      [  234.842737]  ? __kmalloc+0x4d/0x330
      [  234.842739]  __kmalloc+0x4d/0x330
      [  234.842742]  i915_vma_coredump_create+0x78/0x5b0 [i915]
      [  234.842793]  ? capture_vma+0xbe/0x110 [i915]
      [  234.842844]  intel_engine_coredump_add_vma+0x36/0xe0 [i915]
      [  234.842892]  __i915_gpu_coredump+0x290/0x5e0 [i915]
      [  234.842939]  i915_capture_error_state+0x57/0xa0 [i915]
      [  234.842985]  intel_gt_handle_error+0x348/0x3e0 [i915]
      [  234.843032]  ? __mutex_lock+0x81/0x830
      [  234.843035]  ? simple_attr_write+0x3a/0xe0
      [  234.843038]  ? __lock_acquire+0x3bf/0x1dc0
      [  234.843041]  intel_gt_debugfs_reset_store+0x3c/0x90 [i915]
      [  234.843083]  ? _copy_from_user+0x45/0x80
      [  234.843086]  simple_attr_write+0xc1/0xe0
      [  234.843089]  full_proxy_write+0x53/0x80
      [  234.843091]  vfs_write+0xbc/0x350
      [  234.843094]  ksys_write+0x58/0xd0
      [  234.843096]  do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
      [  234.843098]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
      [  234.843101] RIP: 0033:0x7fa467480877
      [  234.843103] Code: 75 05 48 83 c4 58 c3 e8 37 4e ff ff 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 10 b8 01 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 51 c3 48 83 ec 28 48 89 54 24 18 48 89 74 24
      [  234.843108] RSP: 002b:00007ffd14d79b08 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
      [  234.843112] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffd14d79b60 RCX: 00007fa467480877
      [  234.843114] RDX: 0000000000000014 RSI: 00007ffd14d79b60 RDI: 0000000000000007
      [  234.843116] RBP: 0000000000000007 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007ffd14d79ab0
      [  234.843119] R10: ffffffffffffffff R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000014
      [  234.843121] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007ffd14d79b60 R15: 0000000000000005
      
      v5:
      - Use __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM rather than __GFP_NOWAIT for clarity.
        (Daniel Vetter)
      v6:
      - Include an instance in execlists_capture_work().
      - Rework the commit message due to patch reordering.
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarRamalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211108174547.979714-3-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
      8b91cdd4
    • Thomas Hellström's avatar
      drm/i915: Avoid allocating a page array for the gpu coredump · e45b98ba
      Thomas Hellström authored
      
      
      The gpu coredump typically takes place in a dma_fence signalling
      critical path, and hence can't use GFP_KERNEL allocations, as that
      means we might hit deadlocks under memory pressure. However
      changing to __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM which will be done in an upcoming
      patch will instead mean a lower chance of the allocation succeeding.
      In particular large contigous allocations like the coredump page
      vector.
      Remove the page vector in favor of a linked list of single pages.
      Use the page lru list head as the list link, as the page owner is
      allowed to do that.
      
      Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarRamalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211108174547.979714-2-thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
      e45b98ba
  14. Nov 25, 2021